Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] vs OutSystems comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Experience Manager Mo...
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OutSystems
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Development Platforms (1st), Rapid Application Development Software (4th), Low-Code Development Platforms (4th)
 

Featured Reviews

R Mishra - PeerSpot reviewer
Fulfills all the requirements of a CMS tool and is stable and scalable
I think it's the best content management system, fulfilling all the requirements of a CMS tool The license cost is too high, and customers hesitate to implement this solution. I've been using it for five years. The stability is the best. It's scalable. The technical support is good, and I…
DhrubajyotiBiswas - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps us efficiently streamline repetitive tasks, but they could provide improved connectors to integrate with outside platforms
The OutSystems' most effective features for speeding up development cycles are the process orchestration and the drag-and-drop updating of business processes. I would recommend it to a friend or colleague, especially if they are looking for a solution that is easy to deploy and helps streamline internal processes. I rate it a six out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I have found Adobe Experience Manager Mobile to be reliable."
"I think it's the best content management system, fulfilling all the requirements of a CMS tool."
"We can quickly develop an application using the tool."
"OutSystems' best feature is that you can build tests with the flow, so even the tests are made in the PDD framework in a low-code way."
"The most valuable features of OutSystems are the user interface, the flexibility to quickly integrate with almost anything in the system, and the ability to connect with databases."
"The solution helps to build mobile and web applications on SOAP and REST. You can integrate it with backend systems by submitting a code."
"OutSystems is a hybrid framework and supports my mobile and web application development needs. This means I don't have to write separate code for mobile applications. It adapts the UI and functionality, whether I'm developing for web or mobile interfaces. All I need to do is provide the layout during development."
"OutSystems' low-cost approach has positively impacted our productivity, because we were able to develop faster with OutSystems, enabling us to implement many changes during our sprint."
"Speed of delivery: We were able to reduce development time by 30%."
"I really like the one-click publish feature in OutSystems. In other development tools/languages, it's not as easy. I also like how easily I can manage all my projects in one place."
 

Cons

"Adobe Experience Manager Mobile could be improved by making it much easier to share the design system between different projects."
"The license cost is too high, and customers hesitate to implement this solution."
"The product could benefit from improved connectors to integrate with outside platforms."
"It needs improvement in the AI capability."
"Mobile apps should have been fully native."
"The installation is a bit tedious."
"We had some lagging issues under high data loads, and the solution needed to be customized to improve this."
"The resource availability needs to be increased."
"Writing custom code still needs to be done via Integration Studio. This might have been added to the IDE."
"The documentation needs to be more robust."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a product with a high licensing cost."
"I would rate it five to six out of ten."
"OutSystems is a very expensive solution, and it has to be cheaper."
"There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to OutSystems. It is an expensive product."
"The product is expensive and I would rate its pricing a seven out of ten. You need to pay a yearly subscription to use the product."
"OutSystems is an expensive product. My company has to make monthly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution."
"It is very high price."
"There is a free trial to use this solution and other options available, such as enterprise. There are different subscription plans."
"For one developer to use, the cost is around $5,000."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
13%
Educational Organization
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Which solution is better for developing non-ITSM applications: OutSystems or Service Now?
The short answer is that OutSystems is far better for 2 main reasons. Firstly, with Service Now you are locked into that platform for good. The business model is to lock in and then keep pumping th...
What industries do you think OutSystems is most useful for?
I cannot really name an industry in which OutSystems cannot be beneficial. Who does not want to make top-notch applications that work in no time? And OutsyStems does exactly that. The low-code plat...
How did you decide which OutSystems edition was the best one for you?
We started using OutSystems fairly recently, so we are still on the free version of it. My company is still testing how we like the platform, but so far, we have been satisfied with it and will li...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

MasterCard, Nedbank, Motorola, Craftsman
Randstad, Warner Brothers, HP, Intel, ING, Banco Popular, Thrivent Financial, Bacardi, Kent State University, Bacardi, FICO, ING, Vodafone, AbbVie, Estafeta, Siemens, Vopak
Find out what your peers are saying about OutSystems, Salesforce, Mendix and others in Mobile Development Platforms. Updated: June 2025.
860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.