Acunetix vs Venn Software comparison

Invicti and Venn Software are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Invicti is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.3, while Venn Software is ranked #59. Invicti holds a 2.9% mindshare in AS, compared to Venn Software’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Venn Software users who would recommend it.

Acunetix

Read 33 Acunetix reviews

3,069 Views
2,419 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Venn Software

Read 3 Venn Software reviews

136 Views
33 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Acunetix

Venn Software

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Acunetix and Venn Software are key players in the cybersecurity market. While Acunetix stands out in support and pricing, Venn Software's features appeal to many users due to its comprehensive offerings.

Features: Acunetix offers robust vulnerability detection, seamless integration with existing security systems, and strong support for various web technologies. Venn Software provides advanced risk management tools, detailed analytics capabilities, and specialized threat assessment features.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix could improve its reporting capabilities, reduce false positives, and enhance user interface design. Venn Software may benefit from more intuitive navigation, improved data export options, and streamlined setup processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix is recognized for its straightforward deployment process and responsive service team. Venn Software, while more complex to deploy, offers outstanding customer support that addresses user needs effectively.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix offers competitive pricing with a clear ROI by effectively reducing security breaches. Venn Software, although more expensive, is seen as a worthwhile investment due to its impactful long-term benefits. Exact pricing may vary based on specific business requirements and usage.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. Venn Software Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Venn Software

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in Application Security Tools

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (13th), Vulnerability Management (22nd), DevSecOps (6th)

Venn Software

Ranking in Application Security Tools

59th

Average Rating

9.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Remote Access (31st), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (34th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 2.9%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Venn Software is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

KashifJamil

CEO at Xcelliti

Has enabled teams to improve security testing with smooth integration and high accuracy

Acunetix has a very good ratio of fewer false positives, so users don't need to retest everything. Acunetix operates smoothly with no interruptions required, and it performs at 100% efficiency without issues in scanning anything. The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. Acunetix integrates with every type of tool, including CI/CD tools, offering 100% integration in DevOps environments. The main benefit of Acunetix is that at the first level, users can address security issues related to penetration testing, allowing them to expose vulnerabilities and ensure all required testing is completed with very few false positives.

Read full review

reviewer2110356

Growth Specialist at Digitrends Soultions

Great for hybrid workers, minimizes latency and delivers great performance

We haven't encountered major issues with the solution. We are really happy that we decided to purchase Venn Software, although they are quite new. The initial setup is seamless. It's not overly complex. In our experience, for the most part, the solution is reliable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches. That said, the performance could be a bit better. We'd like to see a bit more done with the deployment capabilities. The solution needs to offer better local or regional support to cater to offshore users.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention."

"The most valuable feature of Acunetix is the UI and the scan results are simple."

"The vulnerability scanning option for analyzing the security loopholes on the websites is the most valuable feature of this solution."

"By integrating with CI/CD tools, it enables a shift-left approach in the development process."

"For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature."

"The product is really easy to use."

"The solution is highly stable."

"I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention."

More Acunetix pros

"It allows us to improve our security and prevent company files and data leaks."

"We don't need to go to the physical office, and it only requires minimal supervision or assistance from our IT Team."

"Since the software is launched directly from the computer, not remotely delivered, it has minimized latency and response time."

Cons

"There was an issue related to updates from the internet."

"Acunetix needs to be dynamic with JavaScript code, unlike Netsparker which can scan complex agents."

"The cost can be reduced as management has noted it to be on the higher side."

"It would be nice to have a feature to "retest" only a single vulnerability that the customer reports as patched, and delete it from the next scans since it has already been patched."

"It is difficult to create a proxy connection."

"It should be easier to recreate something manually, with the manual tool, because Acunetix is an automatic tool. If it finds something, it should be easier to manually replicate it. Sometimes you don't get the raw data from the input and output, so that could be improved."

"The solution's pricing could be better."

"In terms of what needs improvement, the way the licensing model is currently is not very convenient for us because initially, when we bought it, the licensing model was very flexible, but now it restricts us."

More Acunetix cons

"Currently, Venn only uses two platforms/applications: Windows and Mac. It would be great if they could also add more platforms since some BYOD employees might be using an application other than Windows or Mac - for example, Linux."

"We'd like to see a bit more done with the deployment capabilities."

"It would be better to have the back end more efficient."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."

"The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."

"The price is exceptionally high."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."

"The solution is expensive."

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

Most of the customers who use Acunetix are looking for security testing. The primary use case is performing penetration testing. The main use cases include vulnerability scanning, security testing,...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

Acunetix supports multi-user environments effectively. Acunetix is targeted for small to mid-size teams in a DevSecOps environment, making it the best choice for small and mid-size companies, offer...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 17% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Compared 11% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Acunetix

Compared 9% of the time

Invicti vs Acunetix

Compared 7% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Acunetix

Compared 6% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

Microsoft Intune vs Venn Software

Compared 67% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Venn Software

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs Venn Software

Compared 13% of the time

More Venn Software Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix

June 2025

Download Acunetix product report

Buyer's Guide

Remote Access

June 2025

Download Venn Software product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

No data available

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Invicti

Venn Software is a powerful platform lauded for its robust features, intuitive UI, and responsive customer support. Users appreciate its scalability, customization options, and seamless integration capabilities. However, a few reviews mention occasional performance issues and a steep learning curve, making it challenging for beginners. Based on user reviews, Venn Software provides a reliable solution for businesses seeking advanced functionality, but newcomers may require additional time and support to fully utilize its potential.

Venn Software

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Venn is currently being used by 700+ organizations. The newest version of our secure workspace is selling not only to our existing customer base but to new companies like Voya, ModSquad, TTech and many others.

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Venn Software

June 2025

Free Report: Acunetix vs. Venn Software

Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. Venn Software and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Acunetix vs. Venn Software report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.