Acunetix vs Software Risk Manager ASPM comparison

Invicti and Black Duck are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Invicti is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.1, while Black Duck is ranked #32. Invicti holds a 3.0% mindshare in SAST, compared to Black Duck’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution.

Acunetix

Read 37 Acunetix reviews

5,979 Views
3,827 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Software Risk Manager ASPM

Read 1 Software Risk Manager ASPM review

894 Views
706 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Acunetix

Software Risk Manager ASPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 21, 2025

Acunetix and Software Risk Manager ASPM compete in the cybersecurity space. Acunetix leads in specific data aspects, while Software Risk Manager ASPM offers a broader feature set and greater perceived value for cost.

Features: Acunetix offers accurate threat detection, detailed reporting, and robust web vulnerability scanning. Software Risk Manager ASPM provides extensive compliance tracking, comprehensive risk assessment functions, and overall Application Security Posture Management solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix allows rapid deployment with minimal custom configuration, supported by responsive support options. Software Risk Manager ASPM may require complex setup but benefits from robust support channels that offer in-depth deployment guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix presents a cost-effective setup with quick ROI due to straightforward implementation. Software Risk Manager ASPM may have a higher initial cost but delivers significant returns by integrating various security aspects.

To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (14th), Vulnerability Management (25th), DevSecOps (6th)

Software Risk Manager ASPM

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

32nd

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (26th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 3.0%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Software Risk Manager ASPM is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Acunetix	3.0%
Software Risk Manager ASPM	0.6%
Other	96.4%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Rahul Kumar

Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees

Identifies vulnerabilities across bulk web applications but needs better support and cleaner reports

The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers. The centralized dashboard of Acunetix gives visibility into the security aspects of mass applications; for instance, with more than 200 applications, it provides a valuable overview of findings and necessary fixes, along with a high-level summary that helps us achieve compliance through monthly and sometimes weekly scanning. In terms of reporting, Acunetix is excellent because it can generate different types of reports, such as an executive summary report, detailed reports, and developer reports that can be shared directly with developers. Acunetix positively impacts my organization by helping identify outdated libraries and applications, including legacy applications vulnerable to old attacks based on OWASP Top 10, thus aiding in compliance checks for PCI DSS and OWASP. Acunetix provides a centralized report with compliance-related aspects and a vulnerability timeline, effectively helping reduce vulnerabilities and save time.

Read full review

Saravanan_Radhakrishnan

Senior Manager at Happiest Minds Technologies

Facilitates continuous assessment of applications, covering both static and dynamic security aspects

Code Dx lacks one aspect, the dynamic security part, known as DAST. It's not an on-premise solution; it's in the cloud now. There are compliance standards and data standards where the customer might need to have the data on-premises for dynamic security testing. So that is one shortfall. An area of improvement could be developing an on-premise DAST solution. The current one is a complete cloud-based solution, and that can be one of the areas of improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The centralized dashboard of Acunetix gives visibility into the security aspects of mass applications; for instance, with more than 200 applications, it provides a valuable overview of findings and necessary fixes, along with a high-level summary that helps us achieve compliance through monthly and sometimes weekly scanning."

"One of the features that I feel is groundbreaking, that I would like to see expanded on, is the IAS feature: The Interactive Application Security Testing module that gets loaded onto an application on a server, for more in-depth, granular findings. I think that is really neat. I haven't seen a lot of competitors doing that."

"Since implementing Acunetix, I have seen improvements as we have discovered real vulnerabilities and threats on our web application server, which is very critical to our organization."

"By integrating with CI/CD tools, it enables a shift-left approach in the development process."

"We use the solution for the scanning of vulnerabilities like SQL injections."

"Acunetix helps reduce the man-days and effort needed for scanning bulk applications through automated assessments, allowing good dashboard visualization that can be reported easily to management, providing complete visibility on vulnerability metrics."

"For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature."

More Acunetix pros

"The customers were looking for something around static security and dynamic security, and in all those areas, they were looking for an industry leader with a proven solution. Synopsys is a Gartner leader, so I position this particular technology for the technical pre-sales part of it."

Cons

"There is room for improvement in website authentication because I've seen other products that can do it much better."

"The only problem that they have is the price. It is a bit expensive, and you cannot change the number of applications for the whole year."

"Acunetix should improve by further reducing false positives and providing more customized reports, plus better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps."

"Tools that would allow us to work more efficiently with the mobile environment, with Android and iOS."

"It should be easier to recreate something manually, with the manual tool, because Acunetix is an automatic tool. If it finds something, it should be easier to manually replicate it. Sometimes you don't get the raw data from the input and output, so that could be improved."

"The solution is generally stable, however, there might be room for improvement regarding glitches or bugs."

"The solution's pricing could be better."

"There was an issue related to updates from the internet."

More Acunetix cons

"The initial setup is a bit challenging because things are not easy. It needs a lot of technology adaptability plus the customer's environment-specific use cases."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."

"The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."

"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

"The price is exceptionally high."

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."

"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

"It is more of an enterprise solution for budget-conscious customers. So, it's moderately priced. It's not for everybody."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

University

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

My main use case for Acunetix is using it as a web security and web vulnerability scanner. I use Acunetix in my day-to-day work to perform web vulnerability assessments for our web servers.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I would rate Acunetix a 10 out of 10. I gave Acunetix a 10 because of its accuracy. My advice to others looking into using Acunetix is that it will be one of the best web vulnerability scanners, pr...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 15% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Compared 8% of the time

Invicti vs Acunetix

Compared 8% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Acunetix

Compared 6% of the time

SonarQube vs Acunetix

Compared 5% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Software Risk Manager ASPM

Compared 22% of the time

Veracode vs Software Risk Manager ASPM

Compared 16% of the time

Snyk vs Software Risk Manager ASPM

Compared 13% of the time

SonarQube vs Software Risk Manager ASPM

Compared 11% of the time

Semgrep vs Software Risk Manager ASPM

Compared 7% of the time

More Software Risk Manager ASPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix

December 2025

Download Acunetix product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)

November 2025

Download Software Risk Manager ASPM product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

Code Dx

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Invicti

Software Risk Manager is an application security posture management (ASPM) solution that enables security and development teams to manage their application security programs at enterprise scale. By unifying policy, test orchestration, correlation, prioritization, and built-in static application security testing (SAST) and software composition analysis (SCA) engines, organizations can streamline their security activities across the enterprise.

Black Duck

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Discover why companies like: CGI said, "Synopsys and Software Risk Manager have provided the results we’re looking for".

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

November 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.