Acunetix vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Invicti and JFrog are both solutions in the DevSecOps category. Invicti is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while JFrog is ranked #16. Invicti holds a 5.5% mindshare in DSO, compared to JFrog’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of JFrog users who would recommend it.

Acunetix

Read 36 Acunetix reviews

12,369 Views
1,608 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Read 3 JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform reviews

4,050 Views
770 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Acunetix

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

Acunetix and JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform are in competition within the cybersecurity and DevOps integration space. Acunetix is noted for its straightforward pricing and support, while JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform is preferred for its advanced features despite the higher cost.

Features: Acunetix provides comprehensive vulnerability detection, detailed scanning capabilities, and essential cybersecurity measures. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform offers an integrated ecosystem for managing binaries, seamless deployments, and robust collaboration tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix offers a swift deployment process with reliable customer service aimed at minimizing setup time. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform requires a more complex deployment but provides extensive resources and support for streamlining the process.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix features a straightforward pricing structure that leads to a quick ROI due to its impact on security. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform demands a higher initial investment, but its feature set justifies the cost for long-term ROI through enhanced DevOps practices.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in DevSecOps

7th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (16th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (11th), Vulnerability Management (30th)

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Ranking in DevSecOps

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Supply Chain Security (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the DevSecOps category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 5.5%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform is 3.6%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

DevSecOps Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Acunetix	5.5%
JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform	3.6%
Other	90.9%

DevSecOps

Featured Reviews

Rahul Kumar

Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees

Identifies vulnerabilities across bulk web applications but needs better support and cleaner reports

The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers. The centralized dashboard of Acunetix gives visibility into the security aspects of mass applications; for instance, with more than 200 applications, it provides a valuable overview of findings and necessary fixes, along with a high-level summary that helps us achieve compliance through monthly and sometimes weekly scanning. In terms of reporting, Acunetix is excellent because it can generate different types of reports, such as an executive summary report, detailed reports, and developer reports that can be shared directly with developers. Acunetix positively impacts my organization by helping identify outdated libraries and applications, including legacy applications vulnerable to old attacks based on OWASP Top 10, thus aiding in compliance checks for PCI DSS and OWASP. Acunetix provides a centralized report with compliance-related aspects and a vulnerability timeline, effectively helping reduce vulnerabilities and save time.

Read full review

Fredierick Saladas

DevOps Lead at Standard Chartered Bank

Provides superior integration options and comprehensive reporting features

The product could benefit from enhanced integration capabilities with older software systems and more customizable reporting options. Improved support for mobile devices would also be advantageous, allowing team members to access the system more effectively while on the go. In the next release, we would like to see advanced analytics features, including predictive analytics to help forecast project outcomes. Additionally, a more robust mobile app with offline capabilities would be valuable for remote work scenarios.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are able to create a report which shows the PCI DSS scoring and share it with the application teams. Then, they can correlate and see exactly what they need to fix, and why."

"Overall, it's a very good tool and a very good engine."

"Our developers can run the attacks directly from their environments, desktops."

"With Acunetix, we cut the time to make infrastructures and web applications for our colleagues more secure, and for one application with two or three critical vulnerabilities and some other vulnerabilities, it took about a week to remediate issues because the scan and findings were really fast."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the speed at which it can scan multiple domains in just a few hours."

"The solution is highly stable."

"One of the features that I feel is groundbreaking, that I would like to see expanded on, is the IAS feature: The Interactive Application Security Testing module that gets loaded onto an application on a server, for more in-depth, granular findings. I think that is really neat. I haven't seen a lot of competitors doing that."

"The centralized dashboard of Acunetix gives visibility into the security aspects of mass applications; for instance, with more than 200 applications, it provides a valuable overview of findings and necessary fixes, along with a high-level summary that helps us achieve compliance through monthly and sometimes weekly scanning."

More Acunetix pros

"The most valuable features include task tracking and reporting capabilities."

"They have a professional service team that works alongside their engineering and performance teams."

"I appreciate the features in JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform, especially the efficient file management where downloads and uploads are optimized, saving time. The storage efficiency is also great as it avoids redundancy, which is crucial for our team. It is also quite easy to use, especially for basic commands through the command line. It's straightforward for us internally, and our data is well-hosted on their servers, which makes data location and querying fast and efficient. Moving our storage to JFrog has streamlined our development cycle by eliminating duplicated data, which previously took up extra space locally. This efficiency is crucial for our workflow, although network speeds still play a significant role in performance."

Cons

"You can't actually change your password after you've set it unless you go back into the administration account and you change it there. Thus, if you're locked out and don't remember your password, that's a thing."

"Improving the handling of false positives would be beneficial because it can be challenging to trust the findings flagged by Acunetix, and those findings must be manually validated."

"When monitoring the traffic we always have issues with the bandwidth consumption and the throttling of traffic."

"Acunetix should improve by further reducing false positives and providing more customized reports, plus better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps."

"The cost can be reduced as management has noted it to be on the higher side."

"The Acunetix licensing and pricing model is somewhat complicated. If we calculated all of our domains and sub-domains, the sum would be huge; that's why we thought of leaving Acunetix."

"The costs for the licensing have changed and it's not in our favor which is why we're now looking at other options."

"The solution is generally stable, however, there might be room for improvement regarding glitches or bugs."

More Acunetix cons

"Our locations are in different environments, so the remote server takes time to catch up, causing replication delays. The engineering team suggested that this issue would be resolved, but I'm not sure if it has been addressed yet. This is more of a feature enhancement that we suggested."

"We have encountered stability issues lately, particularly with frequent 500 internal server errors. Despite efforts from our DevOps team to adjust settings, these issues persist, affecting our workflow, especially with machine learning data uploads. Overall, while it's beneficial for storage and accessibility, stability issues need improvement for seamless operations. The occasional occurrence of internal server errors takes several minutes to resolve on their own and can disrupt workflows. Another concern is that sometimes files appear to be successfully uploaded, but then they cannot be downloaded, with no error message indicating the issue during the upload process. This inconsistency needs to be addressed by JFrog to ensure reliable functionality for users like us."

"The product could benefit from enhanced integration capabilities with older software systems and more customizable reporting options."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."

"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."

"The solution is expensive."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

"The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

"Regarding pricing, I focus on the platform's interface and user communication rather than costs."

"The product pricing is competitive but worth negotiating for volume discounts or longer-term contracts."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which DevSecOps solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

31%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	19

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

In a typical enterprise environment, Acunetix is mainly used for visibility, detection, and investigation across network traffic. The main use cases usually fall into a few core areas, with primary...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I advise that Acunetix is the best option. Invest time in proper initial configuration and scope definitions. The tool is powerful, but its effectiveness depends heavily on how the authenticated ar...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Acunetix?

Everything is perfect and good, including the pricing and all related aspects.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Acunetix

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Acunetix

Compared 4% of the time

Invicti vs Acunetix

Compared 4% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

Checkmarx One vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Compared 15% of the time

GitLab vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Compared 14% of the time

Sonatype Lifecycle vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Socket vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix

October 2026

Download Acunetix product report

Buyer's Guide

Software Supply Chain Security

September 2026

Download JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

No data available

Overview

Acunetix is a dynamic application security tool used globally for web application vulnerability scanning, focusing on SQL injection and cross-site scripting.

Acunetix provides a comprehensive web vulnerability assessment platform designed for identifying and remediating security threats. Users benefit from its ability to schedule scans, boasting a fast detection rate for common vulnerabilities. The tool's centralized dashboard helps organizations with compliance monitoring and features such as crawling and login sequence enhancements, contributing depth to its security assessments. Despite high praise for its integration capabilities and automated scanning that saves time, pricing and false positives present challenges. Organizations often use Acunetix to maintain internal security and evaluate pre-release environments.

What are Acunetix's main features?

Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed reports assist in security analysis and compliance audits.
User-Friendly Interface: Simple navigation enhances user experience.
Scheduled Scans: Automation of scans allows for continuous monitoring.
Fast Detection: Quickly identifies vulnerabilities like SQL injection and cross-site scripting.
Integration Capabilities: Scalable solutions with compatibility across applications.
Crawling & Login Sequence: Improves depth in security analysis.

What benefits should businesses look for in reviews?

Low False Positive Rate: Accurate vulnerability detection saves time in analysis.
Time Efficiency: Automated scans reduce manual workload, improving team productivity.
Scalability: Integration features help accommodate growth and complexity.
Compliance Support: Centralized dashboard supports regulatory compliance checks.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Acunetix assists in protecting sensitive data through robust scanning and reporting capabilities. Its ability to perform dynamic assessments makes it a chosen tool in regulatory environments and development settings, offering both internal security inspections and pre-release evaluations.

Invicti

The JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform optimizes software development life cycles through robust artifact management, CI/CD automation, and strong version control. Notable for its security features, it supports seamless software version maintenance and vulnerability scanning. Praised for enhancing organizational efficiency, it ensures faster, secure deliveries, improving collaboration within teams.

JFrog

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

September 2026

Free Report: Acunetix vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Acunetix vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform report.

See our list of best DevSecOps vendors.

We monitor all DevSecOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.