Acunetix vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform comparison

Invicti and JFrog are both solutions in the DevSecOps category. Invicti is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while JFrog is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. Invicti holds a 9.3% mindshare in DSO, compared to JFrog’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of JFrog users who would recommend it.

Acunetix

Read 33 Acunetix reviews

716 Views
2 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Read 3 JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform reviews

28 Views
1 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Acunetix

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

Acunetix and JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform are in competition within the cybersecurity and DevOps integration space. Acunetix is noted for its straightforward pricing and support, while JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform is preferred for its advanced features despite the higher cost.

Features: Acunetix provides comprehensive vulnerability detection, detailed scanning capabilities, and essential cybersecurity measures. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform offers an integrated ecosystem for managing binaries, seamless deployments, and robust collaboration tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix offers a swift deployment process with reliable customer service aimed at minimizing setup time. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform requires a more complex deployment but provides extensive resources and support for streamlining the process.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix features a straightforward pricing structure that leads to a quick ROI due to its impact on security. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform demands a higher initial investment, but its feature set justifies the cost for long-term ROI through enhanced DevOps practices.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in DevSecOps

6th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (16th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (13th), Vulnerability Management (22nd)

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Ranking in DevSecOps

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Supply Chain Security (16th), AWS Marketplace (36th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the DevSecOps category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 9.3%, down from 10.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform is 0.6%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

DevSecOps

Featured Reviews

KashifJamil

CEO at Xcelliti

Has enabled teams to improve security testing with smooth integration and high accuracy

Acunetix has a very good ratio of fewer false positives, so users don't need to retest everything. Acunetix operates smoothly with no interruptions required, and it performs at 100% efficiency without issues in scanning anything. The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. Acunetix integrates with every type of tool, including CI/CD tools, offering 100% integration in DevOps environments. The main benefit of Acunetix is that at the first level, users can address security issues related to penetration testing, allowing them to expose vulnerabilities and ensure all required testing is completed with very few false positives.

Read full review

Fredierick Saladas

DevOps Lead at Standard Chartered Bank

Provides superior integration options and comprehensive reporting features

The product could benefit from enhanced integration capabilities with older software systems and more customizable reporting options. Improved support for mobile devices would also be advantageous, allowing team members to access the system more effectively while on the go. In the next release, we would like to see advanced analytics features, including predictive analytics to help forecast project outcomes. Additionally, a more robust mobile app with offline capabilities would be valuable for remote work scenarios.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It can operate both as a standalone and it can be integrated with other applications, which makes it a very versatile solution to have."

"It generates automated reports."

"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."

"For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature."

"By integrating with CI/CD tools, it enables a shift-left approach in the development process."

"We are able to create a report which shows the PCI DSS scoring and share it with the application teams. Then, they can correlate and see exactly what they need to fix, and why."

"The features of Acunetix have proved most effective in identifying vulnerabilities."

"We use the solution for the scanning of vulnerabilities like SQL injections."

More Acunetix pros

"They have a professional service team that works alongside their engineering and performance teams."

"The most valuable features include task tracking and reporting capabilities."

"I appreciate the features in JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform, especially the efficient file management where downloads and uploads are optimized, saving time. The storage efficiency is also great as it avoids redundancy, which is crucial for our team. It is also quite easy to use, especially for basic commands through the command line. It's straightforward for us internally, and our data is well-hosted on their servers, which makes data location and querying fast and efficient. Moving our storage to JFrog has streamlined our development cycle by eliminating duplicated data, which previously took up extra space locally. This efficiency is crucial for our workflow, although network speeds still play a significant role in performance."

Cons

"The cost can be reduced as management has noted it to be on the higher side."

"You can't actually change your password after you've set it unless you go back into the administration account and you change it there. Thus, if you're locked out and don't remember your password, that's a thing."

"When monitoring the traffic we always have issues with the bandwidth consumption and the throttling of traffic."

"I rate its stability six out of ten."

"In terms of what needs improvement, the way the licensing model is currently is not very convenient for us because initially, when we bought it, the licensing model was very flexible, but now it restricts us."

"Acunetix should improve by further reducing false positives and providing more customized reports, plus better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps."

"Acunetix needs to improve its cost."

"The solution can be improved by adding the ability to scan subdomains automatically, and by providing reports that can be exported to external databases to share with other solutions."

More Acunetix cons

"The product could benefit from enhanced integration capabilities with older software systems and more customizable reporting options."

"We have encountered stability issues lately, particularly with frequent 500 internal server errors. Despite efforts from our DevOps team to adjust settings, these issues persist, affecting our workflow, especially with machine learning data uploads. Overall, while it's beneficial for storage and accessibility, stability issues need improvement for seamless operations. The occasional occurrence of internal server errors takes several minutes to resolve on their own and can disrupt workflows. Another concern is that sometimes files appear to be successfully uploaded, but then they cannot be downloaded, with no error message indicating the issue during the upload process. This inconsistency needs to be addressed by JFrog to ensure reliable functionality for users like us."

"Our locations are in different environments, so the remote server takes time to catch up, causing replication delays. The engineering team suggested that this issue would be resolved, but I'm not sure if it has been addressed yet. This is more of a feature enhancement that we suggested."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."

"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."

"The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

"The solution is expensive."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

"The product pricing is competitive but worth negotiating for volume discounts or longer-term contracts."

"Regarding pricing, I focus on the platform's interface and user communication rather than costs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which DevSecOps solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

Most of the customers who use Acunetix are looking for security testing. The primary use case is performing penetration testing. The main use cases include vulnerability scanning, security testing,...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

Acunetix supports multi-user environments effectively. Acunetix is targeted for small to mid-size teams in a DevSecOps environment, making it the best choice for small and mid-size companies, offer...

See all answers

What needs improvement with JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform?

Overall, the solution has been a great asset to our team. I advise investing time in the initial setup and training to leverage its capabilities fully. Ensure you clearly understand your needs and ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform?

The product pricing is competitive but worth negotiating for volume discounts or longer-term contracts. Licensing options are flexible, but ensure you understand the terms and any additional costs ...

See all answers

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 16% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Compared 11% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Acunetix

Compared 9% of the time

Invicti vs Acunetix

Compared 7% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Acunetix

Compared 6% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix

June 2025

Download Acunetix product report

Buyer's Guide

AWS Marketplace

June 2025

Download JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

No data available

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Invicti

The JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform optimizes software development life cycles through robust artifact management, CI/CD automation, and strong version control. Notable for its security features, it supports seamless software version maintenance and vulnerability scanning. Praised for enhancing organizational efficiency, it ensures faster, secure deliveries, improving collaboration within teams.

JFrog

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

June 2025

Free Report: Acunetix vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Acunetix vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform report.

See our list of best DevSecOps vendors.

We monitor all DevSecOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.