Acunetix vs Ixia BreakingPoint comparison

Invicti and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Invicti is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.3, while Keysight Technologies is ranked #34. Invicti holds a 3.5% mindshare in SAST, compared to Keysight Technologies’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

Acunetix

Read 33 Acunetix reviews

6,151 Views
3,998 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Ixia BreakingPoint

Read 8 Ixia BreakingPoint reviews

788 Views
678 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Acunetix

Ixia BreakingPoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Acunetix and Ixia BreakingPoint lead in network security and testing products. Acunetix often has the upper hand due to its intuitive support and ease of deployment, while Ixia BreakingPoint stands out for its advanced features.

Features: Acunetix provides robust scanning capabilities, vulnerability management, and an intuitive interface, which are critical for web application security. Ixia BreakingPoint is noted for its comprehensive testing tools, realistic traffic simulations, and advanced feature set, which offer a broader value in network security simulations.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix could benefit from better integration options with third-party tools, broader interoperability, and enhanced user interface customization. Ixia BreakingPoint users have suggested improvements in streamlined updates, better documentation, and simplifying its complex interface for ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix is easy to deploy and has reliable customer service, which users appreciate for its simplicity and quick adoption. Ixia BreakingPoint deployment is more complex; however, its extensive customer support is helpful in overcoming initial setup challenges and ensures a supportive experience for users.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix is cost-effective, offering a good return on investment with quick vulnerability resolution, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Ixia BreakingPoint involves a higher initial cost, which users find justified by its expansive capabilities and feature depth, making it suitable for those ready to invest in broader network security functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. Ixia BreakingPoint Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Ixia BreakingPoint

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (16th), Vulnerability Management (21st), DevSecOps (6th)

Ixia BreakingPoint

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

34th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 3.5%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ixia BreakingPoint is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

KashifJamil

CEO at Xcelliti

Has enabled teams to improve security testing with smooth integration and high accuracy

Acunetix has a very good ratio of fewer false positives, so users don't need to retest everything. Acunetix operates smoothly with no interruptions required, and it performs at 100% efficiency without issues in scanning anything. The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. Acunetix integrates with every type of tool, including CI/CD tools, offering 100% integration in DevOps environments. The main benefit of Acunetix is that at the first level, users can address security issues related to penetration testing, allowing them to expose vulnerabilities and ensure all required testing is completed with very few false positives.

Read full review

Sai Prasad

Staff QA Engineer at Virsec

Works better for testing traffic, mix profile, and enrollment scenarios than other solutions

Once, when I raised a ticket regarding a hardware or software issue, the solution's support team visited our company to discuss and find out ways to solve the problem. Sometimes, they asked us to send several photos from the back and front end to identify the issue. It was time-consuming as we were occupied with some other testing simultaneously. Instead, it would have been great if they could have visited our company and rectified the problem.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the solution for the scanning of vulnerabilities like SQL injections."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the speed at which it can scan multiple domains in just a few hours."

"I haven't seen reporting of that level in any other tool."

"By integrating with CI/CD tools, it enables a shift-left approach in the development process."

"The most important feature is that it's a web-based graphical user interface. That is a great addition. Also, the ability to schedule scans is great."

"The solution is highly stable."

"One of the features that I feel is groundbreaking, that I would like to see expanded on, is the IAS feature: The Interactive Application Security Testing module that gets loaded onto an application on a server, for more in-depth, granular findings. I think that is really neat. I haven't seen a lot of competitors doing that."

"It generates automated reports."

More Acunetix pros

"The solution has many protocols and options, making it very flexible."

"The most valuable feature of Ixia BreakingPoint is the ransomware and malware database for simulated attacks."

"It is a scalable solution."

"I like that we can test cloud applications."

"The DDoS testing module is useful and quick to use."

"We use Ixia BreakingPoint for Layer 7 traffic generation. That's what we like."

"There is a virtual version of the product which is scaled to 100s of virtual testing blades."

Cons

"I rate its stability six out of ten."

"The solution can be improved by adding the ability to scan subdomains automatically, and by providing reports that can be exported to external databases to share with other solutions."

"You can't actually change your password after you've set it unless you go back into the administration account and you change it there. Thus, if you're locked out and don't remember your password, that's a thing."

"There was an issue related to updates from the internet."

"Acunetix needs to improve its cost."

"It should be easier to recreate something manually, with the manual tool, because Acunetix is an automatic tool. If it finds something, it should be easier to manually replicate it. Sometimes you don't get the raw data from the input and output, so that could be improved."

"The solution is generally stable, however, there might be room for improvement regarding glitches or bugs."

"There is room for improvement in website authentication because I've seen other products that can do it much better."

More Acunetix cons

"The production traffic simulations are not realistic enough for some types of DDoS attacks."

"The solution originally was hard to configure; I'm not sure if they've updated this to make it simpler, but if not, it's something that could be streamlined."

"I would appreciate some preconfigured network neighborhoods, which are predefined settings for testing networks."

"The price could be better."

"They should improve UI mode packages for the users."

"The quality of the traffic generation could be improved with Ixia BreakingPoint, i.e. to get closer to being accurate in what a real user will do."

"The integration could improve in Ixia BreakingPoint."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."

"Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."

"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

"The price is exceptionally high."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

"We have a one year subscription license for $25,000 US Dollars."

"or us, the pricing is somewhere around $12,000 a year. I'm unsure as to what new licenses now cost."

"The price is high. We pay for the license monthly."

"There is no differentiation in licenses for Breaking Point. For one license, you will get all the features. There is no complexity in that."

"The solution is expensive."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

Most of the customers who use Acunetix are looking for security testing. The primary use case is performing penetration testing. The main use cases include vulnerability scanning, security testing,...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

Acunetix supports multi-user environments effectively. Acunetix is targeted for small to mid-size teams in a DevSecOps environment, making it the best choice for small and mid-size companies, offer...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 17% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Compared 11% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Acunetix

Compared 9% of the time

Invicti vs Acunetix

Compared 8% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Acunetix

Compared 5% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

Spirent CyberFlood vs Ixia BreakingPoint

Compared 73% of the time

Defensics Fuzzing vs Ixia BreakingPoint

Compared 17% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Ixia BreakingPoint

Compared 10% of the time

More Ixia BreakingPoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix

August 2025

Download Acunetix product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

August 2025

Download Ixia BreakingPoint product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

No data available

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Invicti

By simulating real-world legitimate traffic, distributed denial of service (DDoS), exploits, malware, and fuzzing, BreakingPoint validates an organization’s security infrastructure, reduces the risk of network degradation by almost 80%, and increases attack readiness by nearly 70%.

Keysight Technologies

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Corsa Technology

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Ixia BreakingPoint

July 2025

Free Report: Acunetix vs. Ixia BreakingPoint

Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. Ixia BreakingPoint and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Acunetix vs. Ixia BreakingPoint report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.