Acunetix vs Apiiro comparison

Read 3 Apiiro reviews

1,529 Views
1,086 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Acunetix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Acunetix and Apiiro are two cybersecurity products competing in the vulnerability management and application security domain. Apiiro is perceived to have an edge due to its comprehensive feature set tailored for complex security needs, despite Acunetix's favorable pricing and support.

Features: Acunetix provides robust web application security with user-friendly vulnerability scanning capabilities. Its scanning technology is advanced, making it efficient for detecting web vulnerabilities. Apiiro offers predictive risk prioritization, deep code scanning, and a holistic approach to application lifecycle security, making it appealing for organizations requiring extensive feature depth and security coverage.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix could enhance third-party tool integrations and streamline its update process while maintaining its initial setup convenience. Apiiro has room for improvement concerning its complexity and learning curve, potentially benefiting from enhanced training resources to simplify onboarding.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix enables straightforward deployment and has responsive customer service, which suits various user levels. Apiiro's deployment is complex due to detailed configuration options, but its customer service offers high expertise, indicating its focus on tailored solutions for intricate environments.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix offers competitive pricing and a clear ROI, focusing on straightforward web vulnerability management. Apiiro’s pricing reflects its advanced capabilities, providing substantial ROI by enhancing the security posture for organizations with complex security needs, essential for those who prioritize an in-depth analysis over initial cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. Apiiro Report (Updated: July 2025).

Download the complete report

Acunetix vs. Apiiro

July 2025

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (16th), Vulnerability Management (21st), DevSecOps (6th)

Apiiro

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (10th), API Security (11th), Software Supply Chain Security (8th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (12th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 3.5%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Apiiro is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

KashifJamil

CEO at Xcelliti

Has enabled teams to improve security testing with smooth integration and high accuracy

Acunetix has a very good ratio of fewer false positives, so users don't need to retest everything. Acunetix operates smoothly with no interruptions required, and it performs at 100% efficiency without issues in scanning anything. The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. Acunetix integrates with every type of tool, including CI/CD tools, offering 100% integration in DevOps environments. The main benefit of Acunetix is that at the first level, users can address security issues related to penetration testing, allowing them to expose vulnerabilities and ensure all required testing is completed with very few false positives.

Read full review

Kunal M

Capability Center Leader, ETRM Platforms at Shell

Comprehensive risk analysis helps identify key performance trends but report access needs improvement

My first feedback for Apiiro is that it is very slow, extremely slow. The moment I select from the entire list of repositories in my vertical, which is almost more than 400 repositories, it takes a lot of time for me to load the report. Sometimes it fails. I do not have Role-Based Access Control (RBAC). It's only given to the application security team, and Apiiro as a vendor does not have the rollback access control enabled for the clients, so that would have given me access to the reports tab, which would have made my life easier. Currently, I have to go to the risks tab to pull out all this information. I started exploring dashboards with Copilot. I need to reach out to the Apiiro teams to see if I can get an access token so that I can pull out a Power BI dashboard. I think Apiiro definitely has its own capabilities, but if there are access tokens that teams can use to build a custom dashboard, that would be great. This might already exist, but that is something which will ease the vulnerability management day-to-day activities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It generates automated reports."

"For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature."

"Their technical support has been very active. If I have an issue, I can reach out to them and get an answer pretty quick."

"The features of Acunetix have proved most effective in identifying vulnerabilities."

"The automated approach to these repetitive discovery attempts would take days to do manually and therefore it helps reduce the time needed to do an assessment."

"The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities."

"The usability and overall scan results are good."

"The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code."

More Acunetix pros

"Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly."

"The workflow automation is likely the best aspect of the solution."

Cons

"There's a clear need for a reduction in pricing to make the service more accessible."

"When monitoring the traffic we always have issues with the bandwidth consumption and the throttling of traffic."

"It should be easier to recreate something manually, with the manual tool, because Acunetix is an automatic tool. If it finds something, it should be easier to manually replicate it. Sometimes you don't get the raw data from the input and output, so that could be improved."

"The only problem that they have is the price. It is a bit expensive, and you cannot change the number of applications for the whole year."

"We have had issues during upgrades where their scans worked on some apps better with previous versions. Then, we had to work with their tech support, who were great, to get it fixed for the next version."

"It is difficult to create a proxy connection."

"Integration into other tools is very limited for Acunetix. While we're trying to incorporate a CI/CD process where we're integrating with JIRA and we're integrating with Jenkins and Chef, it becomes problematic. Other tools give you a high integration capability to connect into different solutions that you may already have, like JIRA."

"Currently only supports web scanning."

More Acunetix cons

"User management is a little bit clunky."

"I would like support for our self-hosted Git server, other than GitHub, just regular Git."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"The price is exceptionally high."

"All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."

"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."

"The solution is expensive."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

Most of the customers who use Acunetix are looking for security testing. The primary use case is performing penetration testing. The main use cases include vulnerability scanning, security testing,...

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

Acunetix supports multi-user environments effectively. Acunetix is targeted for small to mid-size teams in a DevSecOps environment, making it the best choice for small and mid-size companies, offer...

What do you like most about Apiiro?

Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apiiro?

My understanding is the pricing is pretty competitive.

What needs improvement with Apiiro?

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 17% of the time

Compared 11% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Acunetix

Compared 9% of the time

Invicti vs Acunetix

Compared 8% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Acunetix

Compared 5% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

Snyk vs Apiiro

Compared 23% of the time

Cycode vs Apiiro

Compared 18% of the time

Ox Security vs Apiiro

Compared 13% of the time

Legit Security vs Apiiro

Compared 10% of the time

Wiz Code vs Apiiro

Compared 8% of the time

More Apiiro Competitors

Product Reports

Download Acunetix product report

Acunetix

August 2025

Download Apiiro product report

August 2025

Also Known As

AcuSensor

Apiiro Control Plane (ASOC), Apiiro API Security (SAST), Apiiro Open Source (SCA)

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Invicti

Apiiro is the leader in application security posture management (ASPM), unifying risk visibility, prioritization, and remediation with deep code analysis and runtime context.

Companies like Morgan Stanley, SoFi, Rakuten, and Navan leverage Apiiro's ASPM to...

Get complete application and risk visibility: Apiiro takes a deep, code-based approach to ASPM. Its Cloud Application Security Platform analyzes source code and pulls in runtime context to build a continuous, graph-based inventory of application and software supply chain components.

Prioritize risks with code-to-runtime context: With its proprietary Risk Graph™️, Apiiro contextualizes security alerts from third-party tools and native security solutions based on the likelihood and impact of risk to uniquely minimize alert backlogs and triage time by 95%.

Fix and prevent risks that matter—faster: By tying risks to code owners, providing LLM-enriched remediation guidance, and embedding risk-based guardrails directly into developer tools and workflows, Apiiro improves remediation times (MTTR) by up to 85%.

Apiiro's native security solutions include API security testing in code, secrets detection and validation, software bill of materials (SBOM) generation, sensitive data exposure prevention, software composition analysis (SCA), and CI/CD and SCM security.

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Morgan Stanley, Rakuten, Jack Henry, SoFi, Colgate, Navan