Acunetix vs Apiiro comparison

Read 3 Apiiro reviews

4,329 Views
2,511 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Acunetix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Acunetix and Apiiro are two cybersecurity products competing in the vulnerability management and application security domain. Apiiro is perceived to have an edge due to its comprehensive feature set tailored for complex security needs, despite Acunetix's favorable pricing and support.

Features: Acunetix provides robust web application security with user-friendly vulnerability scanning capabilities. Its scanning technology is advanced, making it efficient for detecting web vulnerabilities. Apiiro offers predictive risk prioritization, deep code scanning, and a holistic approach to application lifecycle security, making it appealing for organizations requiring extensive feature depth and security coverage.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix could enhance third-party tool integrations and streamline its update process while maintaining its initial setup convenience. Apiiro has room for improvement concerning its complexity and learning curve, potentially benefiting from enhanced training resources to simplify onboarding.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix enables straightforward deployment and has responsive customer service, which suits various user levels. Apiiro's deployment is complex due to detailed configuration options, but its customer service offers high expertise, indicating its focus on tailored solutions for intricate environments.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix offers competitive pricing and a clear ROI, focusing on straightforward web vulnerability management. Apiiro’s pricing reflects its advanced capabilities, providing substantial ROI by enhancing the security posture for organizations with complex security needs, essential for those who prioritize an in-depth analysis over initial cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. Apiiro Report (Updated: September 2026).

Download the complete report

Acunetix vs. Apiiro

September 2026

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (16th), Vulnerability Management (30th), DevSecOps (7th)

Apiiro

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

27th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (18th), API Security (16th), Software Supply Chain Security (11th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (20th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 2.6%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Apiiro is 1.4%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Acunetix	2.6%
Apiiro	1.4%
Other	96.0%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Rahul Kumar

Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees

Identifies vulnerabilities across bulk web applications but needs better support and cleaner reports

The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers. The centralized dashboard of Acunetix gives visibility into the security aspects of mass applications; for instance, with more than 200 applications, it provides a valuable overview of findings and necessary fixes, along with a high-level summary that helps us achieve compliance through monthly and sometimes weekly scanning. In terms of reporting, Acunetix is excellent because it can generate different types of reports, such as an executive summary report, detailed reports, and developer reports that can be shared directly with developers. Acunetix positively impacts my organization by helping identify outdated libraries and applications, including legacy applications vulnerable to old attacks based on OWASP Top 10, thus aiding in compliance checks for PCI DSS and OWASP. Acunetix provides a centralized report with compliance-related aspects and a vulnerability timeline, effectively helping reduce vulnerabilities and save time.

Read full review

Kunal M

Capability Center Leader, ETRM Platforms at Shell

Comprehensive risk analysis helps identify key performance trends but report access needs improvement

My first feedback for Apiiro is that it is very slow, extremely slow. The moment I select from the entire list of repositories in my vertical, which is almost more than 400 repositories, it takes a lot of time for me to load the report. Sometimes it fails. I do not have Role-Based Access Control (RBAC). It's only given to the application security team, and Apiiro as a vendor does not have the rollback access control enabled for the clients, so that would have given me access to the reports tab, which would have made my life easier. Currently, I have to go to the risks tab to pull out all this information. I started exploring dashboards with Copilot. I need to reach out to the Apiiro teams to see if I can get an access token so that I can pull out a Power BI dashboard. I think Apiiro definitely has its own capabilities, but if there are access tokens that teams can use to build a custom dashboard, that would be great. This might already exist, but that is something which will ease the vulnerability management day-to-day activities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the speed at which it can scan multiple domains in just a few hours."

"Acunetix has an awesome crawler. It gives a referral site map of near targets and also goes really deep to find all the inputs without issues. This was valuable because it helped me find some files or directories, like web admin panels without authentication, which were hidden."

"The most valuable feature of Acunetix is the UI and the scan results are simple."

"Segregation of reports is really, really good with Acunetix; it provides us with a lot of in-depth details."

"With Acunetix, we cut the time to make infrastructures and web applications for our colleagues more secure, and for one application with two or three critical vulnerabilities and some other vulnerabilities, it took about a week to remediate issues because the scan and findings were really fast."

"It's very user-friendly for the testing teams. It's very easy for them to understand things and to fix vulnerabilities."

"Login Sequence Recorder, scan throttling, and fantastic reporting output are the most valuable features."

More Acunetix pros

"The workflow automation is likely the best aspect of the solution."

"The positive impact I have seen from working with Apiiro for my company includes the metrics that we get from Apiiro, which have been extremely helpful."

"Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly."

Cons

"Our experience with Acunetix has not been good, so we are in the process of switching solutions."

"There was an issue related to updates from the internet."

"Tool is quite expensive though compared to other tools."

"We have had issues during upgrades where their scans worked on some apps better with previous versions. Then, we had to work with their tech support, who were great, to get it fixed for the next version."

"Integration into other tools is very limited for Acunetix. While we're trying to incorporate a CI/CD process where we're integrating with JIRA and we're integrating with Jenkins and Chef, it becomes problematic. Other tools give you a high integration capability to connect into different solutions that you may already have, like JIRA."

"We want to see how much bandwidth usage it consumes. When we monitor traffic we have issues with the consumption and throttling of the traffic."

"The solution is generally stable, however, there might be room for improvement regarding glitches or bugs."

"The solution should work on dealing with the number of false positives it delivers."

More Acunetix cons

"My first feedback for Apiiro is that it is very slow, extremely slow."

"I would like support for our self-hosted Git server, other than GitHub, just regular Git."

"User management is a little bit clunky."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

"The solution is expensive."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."

"The price is exceptionally high."

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	19

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

In a typical enterprise environment, Acunetix is mainly used for visibility, detection, and investigation across network traffic. The main use cases usually fall into a few core areas, with primary...

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I advise that Acunetix is the best option. Invest time in proper initial configuration and scope definitions. The tool is powerful, but its effectiveness depends heavily on how the authenticated ar...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Acunetix?

Everything is perfect and good, including the pricing and all related aspects.

What needs improvement with Apiiro?

One area Apiiro could improve is reporting customization and dashboard flexibility with more advanced filtering and easier communication.

What is your primary use case for Apiiro?

Apiiro is primarily used for code scanning and integration with source code control. The main use cases include code scanning and code snippet analysis. Apiiro provides security and visibility by h...

What advice do you have for others considering Apiiro?

I would highly recommend Apiiro and a clear understanding of the API landscape and integration requirements before implementing it. Apiiro provides the most value to organizations that have multipl...

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Comparisons

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Acunetix

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Acunetix

Compared 4% of the time

Invicti vs Acunetix

Compared 4% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

Snyk vs Apiiro

Compared 11% of the time

Ox Security vs Apiiro

Compared 10% of the time

Cycode vs Apiiro

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Apiiro

Compared 4% of the time

ArmorCode vs Apiiro

Compared 4% of the time

More Apiiro Competitors

Product Reports

Download Acunetix product report

Acunetix

October 2026

Download Apiiro product report

October 2026

Also Known As

AcuSensor

Apiiro Control Plane (ASOC), Apiiro API Security (SAST), Apiiro Open Source (SCA)

Overview

Acunetix is a dynamic application security tool used globally for web application vulnerability scanning, focusing on SQL injection and cross-site scripting.

Acunetix provides a comprehensive web vulnerability assessment platform designed for identifying and remediating security threats. Users benefit from its ability to schedule scans, boasting a fast detection rate for common vulnerabilities. The tool's centralized dashboard helps organizations with compliance monitoring and features such as crawling and login sequence enhancements, contributing depth to its security assessments. Despite high praise for its integration capabilities and automated scanning that saves time, pricing and false positives present challenges. Organizations often use Acunetix to maintain internal security and evaluate pre-release environments.

What are Acunetix's main features?

Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed reports assist in security analysis and compliance audits.
User-Friendly Interface: Simple navigation enhances user experience.
Scheduled Scans: Automation of scans allows for continuous monitoring.
Fast Detection: Quickly identifies vulnerabilities like SQL injection and cross-site scripting.
Integration Capabilities: Scalable solutions with compatibility across applications.
Crawling & Login Sequence: Improves depth in security analysis.

What benefits should businesses look for in reviews?

Low False Positive Rate: Accurate vulnerability detection saves time in analysis.
Time Efficiency: Automated scans reduce manual workload, improving team productivity.
Scalability: Integration features help accommodate growth and complexity.
Compliance Support: Centralized dashboard supports regulatory compliance checks.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Acunetix assists in protecting sensitive data through robust scanning and reporting capabilities. Its ability to perform dynamic assessments makes it a chosen tool in regulatory environments and development settings, offering both internal security inspections and pre-release evaluations.

Invicti

Apiiro fosters seamless integration of security into the software development lifecycle, enhancing compliance and risk management through continuous code risk assessments.

Apiiro addresses security challenges by providing a robust platform that continuously monitors and assesses code risks. It integrates security directly into development processes to ensure compliance and reduce risk. By leveraging this approach, teams can manage risks proactively, safeguard applications, and enhance overall development efficiency.

What features make Apiiro valuable?

Continuous Code Risk Assessment: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities throughout the development lifecycle.
Integrated Compliance Automation: Streamlines compliance with various standards by automating checks and balances.
Contextual Insights: Delivers meaningful insights to facilitate informed decision-making on security practices.
Collaboration Tools: Enhances teamwork by aligning security teams with development workflows.

What benefits should you evaluate?

Enhanced Security Posture: Frequent assessments lead to improved code quality and reduced vulnerabilities.
Risk Management Efficiency: Real-time analytics offer proactive risk mitigation, saving time and resources.
Accelerated Development: Automated processes enable faster and more secure software delivery.
Reduced Compliance Costs: Automated checks decrease compliance-related expenses.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Apiiro's integration improves compliance and security standards due to heightened regulatory requirements. Its risk-focused approach empowers these industries to secure data and meet stringent security requirements effectively.

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Morgan Stanley, Rakuten, Jack Henry, SoFi, Colgate, Navan