Acunetix vs Apiiro comparison

Invicti and Apiiro are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Invicti is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.3, while Apiiro is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.5. Invicti holds a 3.5% mindshare in SAST, compared to Apiiro’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Apiiro users who would recommend it.

Acunetix

Read 33 Acunetix reviews

4,230 Views
1,142 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Apiiro

Read 2 Apiiro reviews

1,056 Views
66 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Acunetix

Apiiro

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Acunetix and Apiiro are two cybersecurity products competing in the vulnerability management and application security domain. Apiiro is perceived to have an edge due to its comprehensive feature set tailored for complex security needs, despite Acunetix's favorable pricing and support.

Features: Acunetix provides robust web application security with user-friendly vulnerability scanning capabilities. Its scanning technology is advanced, making it efficient for detecting web vulnerabilities. Apiiro offers predictive risk prioritization, deep code scanning, and a holistic approach to application lifecycle security, making it appealing for organizations requiring extensive feature depth and security coverage.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix could enhance third-party tool integrations and streamline its update process while maintaining its initial setup convenience. Apiiro has room for improvement concerning its complexity and learning curve, potentially benefiting from enhanced training resources to simplify onboarding.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix enables straightforward deployment and has responsive customer service, which suits various user levels. Apiiro's deployment is complex due to detailed configuration options, but its customer service offers high expertise, indicating its focus on tailored solutions for intricate environments.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix offers competitive pricing and a clear ROI, focusing on straightforward web vulnerability management. Apiiro’s pricing reflects its advanced capabilities, providing substantial ROI by enhancing the security posture for organizations with complex security needs, essential for those who prioritize an in-depth analysis over initial cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. Apiiro Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Apiiro

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (16th), Vulnerability Management (22nd), DevSecOps (6th)

Apiiro

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

20th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (11th), API Security (11th), Software Supply Chain Security (8th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (12th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 3.5%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Apiiro is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

KashifJamil

CEO at Xcelliti

Has enabled teams to improve security testing with smooth integration and high accuracy

Acunetix has a very good ratio of fewer false positives, so users don't need to retest everything. Acunetix operates smoothly with no interruptions required, and it performs at 100% efficiency without issues in scanning anything. The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. Acunetix integrates with every type of tool, including CI/CD tools, offering 100% integration in DevOps environments. The main benefit of Acunetix is that at the first level, users can address security issues related to penetration testing, allowing them to expose vulnerabilities and ensure all required testing is completed with very few false positives.

Read full review

Ryan-Murphy

Senior Security Engineer at Schrödinger

A great secrets detection feature, good visibility, and integrates well

The biggest benefit of Apiiro for us was the visibility it gave us into our GitHub organization, which we didn't have much of before. The benefit of adding Apiiro early is that it would be integrated into our pipeline from the start. Since we have had some of our software products for many years, we would have to do a lot of cleaning up before integrating Apiiro into our developer workflow. Integrating Apiiro early allows us to stay ahead of the curve on security issues and address them as they arise, rather than having a huge backlog for developers to fix. Apiiro's ability to provide visibility into the risk of our application components is great. This was a selling feature for us. Apiiro was a less mature product a little over a year ago when they were still early on in their development. However, they have made fantastic advancements over the last year, which has given us much more visibility into that sort of thing. Apiiro has helped prevent business-critical risks by making recommendations based on what it thinks is a high or critical issue. I think it does a pretty good job at that, but those recommendations still need a manual review from us. In general, if Apiiro flags a critical issue, it is usually pretty close to identifying whether it is business-critical or not. It is something we should review, even if we end up downgrading it. Apiiro raises valid concerns, and I am happy that it does.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The automated approach to these repetitive discovery attempts would take days to do manually and therefore it helps reduce the time needed to do an assessment."

"We are able to create a report which shows the PCI DSS scoring and share it with the application teams. Then, they can correlate and see exactly what they need to fix, and why."

"It generates automated reports."

"Overall, it's a very good tool and a very good engine."

"For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature."

"By integrating with CI/CD tools, it enables a shift-left approach in the development process."

"There is a lot of documentation on their website which makes setting it up and using it quite simple."

"I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention."

More Acunetix pros

"The workflow automation is likely the best aspect of the solution."

"Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly."

Cons

"We want to see how much bandwidth usage it consumes. When we monitor traffic we have issues with the consumption and throttling of the traffic."

"Acunetix needs to improve its cost."

"The jargon used makes it difficult for project managers to understand the issues, and the technical explanations used make it difficult for developers to understand issues. These things should be simplified much more. That would be very helpful for us when explaining to them what needs to be fixed. The report output needs to be simplified."

"We have had issues during upgrades where their scans worked on some apps better with previous versions. Then, we had to work with their tech support, who were great, to get it fixed for the next version."

"The solution is generally stable, however, there might be room for improvement regarding glitches or bugs."

"The solution's pricing could be better."

"When monitoring the traffic we always have issues with the bandwidth consumption and the throttling of traffic."

"There is room for improvement in website authentication because I've seen other products that can do it much better."

More Acunetix cons

"I would like support for our self-hosted Git server, other than GitHub, just regular Git."

"User management is a little bit clunky."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."

"The solution is expensive."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

"I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

"Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

Most of the customers who use Acunetix are looking for security testing. The primary use case is performing penetration testing. The main use cases include vulnerability scanning, security testing,...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

Acunetix supports multi-user environments effectively. Acunetix is targeted for small to mid-size teams in a DevSecOps environment, making it the best choice for small and mid-size companies, offer...

See all answers

What do you like most about Apiiro?

Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apiiro?

My understanding is the pricing is pretty competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apiiro?

Apiiro recently integrated SaaS, and we would love to see them expand on that. They provide many integrations to different products, including SaaS products such as Snyk. Ideally, Apiiro would incl...

See all answers

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 16% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Compared 11% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Acunetix

Compared 9% of the time

Invicti vs Acunetix

Compared 7% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Acunetix

Compared 6% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

Snyk vs Apiiro

Compared 28% of the time

Cycode vs Apiiro

Compared 19% of the time

Ox Security vs Apiiro

Compared 16% of the time

Legit Security vs Apiiro

Compared 10% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Apiiro

Compared 8% of the time

More Apiiro Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix

June 2025

Download Acunetix product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)

June 2025

Download Apiiro product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

Apiiro Control Plane (ASOC), Apiiro API Security (SAST), Apiiro Open Source (SCA)

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Invicti

Apiiro is the leader in application security posture management (ASPM), unifying risk visibility, prioritization, and remediation with deep code analysis and runtime context.

Companies like Morgan Stanley, SoFi, Rakuten, and Navan leverage Apiiro's ASPM to...

Get complete application and risk visibility: Apiiro takes a deep, code-based approach to ASPM. Its Cloud Application Security Platform analyzes source code and pulls in runtime context to build a continuous, graph-based inventory of application and software supply chain components.

Prioritize risks with code-to-runtime context: With its proprietary Risk Graph™️, Apiiro contextualizes security alerts from third-party tools and native security solutions based on the likelihood and impact of risk to uniquely minimize alert backlogs and triage time by 95%.

Fix and prevent risks that matter—faster: By tying risks to code owners, providing LLM-enriched remediation guidance, and embedding risk-based guardrails directly into developer tools and workflows, Apiiro improves remediation times (MTTR) by up to 85%.

Apiiro's native security solutions include API security testing in code, secrets detection and validation, software bill of materials (SBOM) generation, sensitive data exposure prevention, software composition analysis (SCA), and CI/CD and SCM security.

Apiiro

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Morgan Stanley, Rakuten, Jack Henry, SoFi, Colgate, Navan

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Apiiro

June 2025

Free Report: Acunetix vs. Apiiro

Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. Apiiro and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Acunetix vs. Apiiro report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.