Actional vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aurea Logo
183 views|145 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
468 views|379 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Actional and OpenText Business Process Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Actional vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring Report (Updated: May 2024).
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Anonymous User
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:Synthetic Monitoring is a very good capability as we can simulate the end-user interaction with the application and proactively we can discover issues before the real end users are impacted.
Top Answer:Here are some ways that Micro Focus APM (RUM and BPM) can help you identify the root cause of application issues Real User Monitoring (RUM) collects data from real users as they interact with… more »
Ranking
Views
183
Comparisons
145
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
468
Comparisons
379
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Actional vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring
May 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Actional vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus Business Process Monitor, HPE Business Process Monitor
Learn More
Aurea
Video Not Available
Overview
Actional (CX-Monitor) automatically discovers both systems and processes associated with your active customer journeys or applications and gives you real-time operational profiles and analysis of each system and process.

OpenText Business Process Monitoring is an Application monitoring software.

Proactively and consistently monitor business processes to identify performance issues before they affect users.

Review affected service level agreements.

BPM provides consistent, predictable measurements that help you associate the business impact with its root cause.

Sample Customers
Proximus, Air France-KLM, Barratt Developments, Freedom Mortgage
United Airlines, Vodafone Ireland, TEB, The Australian Red Cross Blood Service
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company16%
Computer Software Company14%
Financial Services Firm14%
Wholesaler/Distributor9%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise66%
Buyer's Guide
Actional vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring
May 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Actional vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Actional is ranked 75th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is ranked 58th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Actional is rated 9.0, while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Actional writes "Decent tool, needs additional integration with automation tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Business Process Monitoring writes "Stable with good performance visibility but is a discontinued product". Actional is most compared with CentraSite, whereas OpenText Business Process Monitoring is most compared with AppDynamics and Dynatrace. See our Actional vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.