IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

What needs improvement with vCenter Configuration Manager?

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with vCenter Configuration Manager.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

PeerSpot user
2121 Answers

Philippe Willaume - PeerSpot reviewer
Top 20Real User

There is always room for improvement. The VxRail configuration is very complicated and a little bit too difficult to guess what the final product is going to be. The product needs better integration with security tools. It's a feature that you wouldn't need to have for something like Cisco or that type of thing. Something of that magnitude would already be built into the product.

Tommy Myo Min Aung - PeerSpot reviewer
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

I expect VMware to move to cloud technology soon, so I have no changes to suggest.

Sayantan Adhikary - PeerSpot reviewer
Top 20Real User

Error reporting should be more precise and descriptive, and there is no way to filter the logs. It would be helpful if its logs analysis can be more detailed, and the logs can be filtered.

reviewer930504 - PeerSpot reviewer
Top 20Real User

It would be better to integrate this infrastructure with native cloud environments, but we can't do it. We are trying to improve our experience by converting our infrastructure through virtualization on native cloud environments and workloads. It's the most important thing for us. I think that it should be tightly coupled with native cloud environments.

Arnin Frederick - PeerSpot reviewer
Real User

They should make it easier to log in and communicate with them. At the moment, I'm using vRealize Log Insight because it's a pretty easy tool to keep up to date with everything. But it would be easier if I could do it through vCenter Configuration Manager. I think the logging side should be improved because it's pretty difficult to keep up to date VMware and with vCenter.

reviewer1264674 - PeerSpot reviewer
Real User

The pricing can be improved. It is not so user-friendly that you can just start the host and everything works. However, for somebody with five or ten years of experience, the administration is not very difficult.

reviewer1418577 - PeerSpot reviewer
Top 5Real User

Honestly, I do not feel like I am an expert with the product who can suggest technical enhancements. The setup and implementation could probably be better. It does not seem like we should have to do so much manual configuration. Instad of supplying everything manually at the prompts, it should offer some options for automation of the setup. I guess something like that is already available, but if it is I do not know it. If automating the updates were possible to do it would be very nice.

reviewer1304046 - PeerSpot reviewer
Real User

The Self Service Interface is not very good and it needs improvement. There should be more flexibility and rules for permissions in the Multi-tenancy.

reviewer1384830 - PeerSpot reviewer
Real User

I can't think of an aspect that needs improvement, as it's work so well for us so far. The solution could be more integrated with the Microsoft environment.

Francisco Gimo - PeerSpot reviewer
Top 20Real User

There are some complexities within the system center. For example, we use two different applications for updates and the deployment of the machine. We also have another third party solution. However, a third-party solution is dedicated to vulnerability management. And all the updates that have to be deployed to a specific product. You spend a lot of time in configuration due to the fact that you need to make sure all of your machines are compliant. Compliance is complicated.

Abdul Amaan - PeerSpot reviewer
Top 20Real User

This is a good solution but it has too many configurations for what it does. In that sense, it's not particularly user friendly and requires too many clicks. From reviews I've read, I believe Acropolis might be easier to use in this regard. I think the solution pretty much covers everything, I can't think of any additional features that might be useful.

Noor Parkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

I don't think there are any features that the solution is lacking. The solution is already quite user-friendly and offers good technical support, but it could always be further refined and improved. The solution should allow for more customization.

Raju Pawar - PeerSpot reviewer
Real User

The snapshot functionality on the solution needs improvement. After renewing the snapshot, all of the production was stuck. Right now, its functionality is one of our main concerns. Aside from the snapshot, everything else is working fine. I can't think of any other features that we'd need in future releases.

reviewer1222275 - PeerSpot reviewer
Real User

In terms of what could be improved, I would say easier management of the whole environment, meaning an easier interface. Additionally, they could improve the hybrid-cloud environment and its management, not only for the localhost but also including the connection between the public and private cloud.

PankajKumar12 - PeerSpot reviewer
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

The cost of this solution should be improved.

Mahdi Bahmani - PeerSpot reviewer
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

Configuration Manager should decrease the deployment time in the data center and the management time as this could help many data centers reduce their operating costs. I think most of VMware's software is easy and simple to use but they lack the capability to manage other systems. When working with some other software out there you have a total solution for managing and configuring your data centers. Many other virtualization systems have this feature, and it would be a good idea for VMware to switch to this approach because I think most data centers are looking for total solutions to manage their data centers. Our trends show that this kind of simple management software is going to be a part of orchestration systems. Overall, I think it's good enough to use for most customers who have VMware solutions in their data centers.

Anil-Bherwani - PeerSpot reviewer
Real User

Customers who want a business solution, should try to implement the IDL based processes for configuration management, patch management, release management and asset management. It will improve the life cycle management of their solution.

reviewer1228122 - PeerSpot reviewer
Real User

The main issue I have with vCenter Configuration Manager is that when I have a problem or error, I have to search a lot to get the solution. There isn't a clear document, and in some instances, none at all. There isn't a clear document covering all the errors. It would be helpful if the company provided better documentation for solving issues. Additionally, I'd like to see more automation features in the next releases. If they could add more automation features to make the configuration and implementation processes easier, that would be good.

IlanBen Shetrit - PeerSpot reviewer
Real User

The solution could use an internal cloud service. It should offer a vCloud foundation, but on-premises. For example, a small cloud environment or something that can be built on-premises and not hosted by Microsoft or other big hosting sites. We'd like to use some sort of vCloud to take the risks away from headquarters. The resources would be on-site on the customer side. The reporting could be improved.

Michael Wilmsen - PeerSpot reviewer
Real User

It can take a long time for the first information to become available. On the other hand, that's normal. It has to collect a lot of information before it can predict future needs. But it would be nice if there was some kind of base level to get started.

BeshoyAmin - PeerSpot reviewer
Real User

The functions are not running in HTML 5, this is a problem. In addition, the interface itself is not very user-friendly.

Buyer's Guide
Configuration Management
May 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Microsoft, HCL and others in Configuration Management. Updated: May 2022.
598,116 professionals have used our research since 2012.