MichaelSukachev - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Enterprise Architect at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
  • 17
  • 545

What are the main cons/pros to choosing Biztalk Server as an ESB platform?

Hello All,

When I'm comparing the ROI for 3 years (licensing only) between Biztalk Server Enterprise Edition and Mule it looks like Biztalk is a good option

I'm looking to find specific cons/pros on features, reliability and maintainability .


PeerSpot user
17 Answers
it_user423384 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant Principal on: MuleSoft Expert, Oracle Fusion Expert, webMethods Expert; Dev, SA, EA, PM at Visual Integrator Consulting
Oct 30, 2017

Microsoft is not selling BizTalk as their current integration solution. You will want to look at Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and API Gateway for evaluating Microsoft's products if you are comparing vendors. I have done a comparison between Microsoft and MuleSoft, and a few other integration and API platforms as well. However, I can not post it publicly. You can reach me directly at Jordan.Braunstein@visualintegrator.com.

Search for a product comparison in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus)
Oct 30, 2017

If you have dot net resources in house, Biztalk is definitely a better option. That being said, I believe java based technologies such as Mule, IBM and iWay are more suited to cases where there are heterogeneous environments. You may also want to look at the ability to connect to various sources, as a cheaper platform may not provide "future proofing"

WebSphere Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Oct 30, 2017

You should also not discard IIB (IBM ESB) from the picture. There are multiple versions that differ in licensing costs (depending on your needs). But it is one of the most portable. You might also want to look at the features and coordinate with your needs....

it_user610077 - PeerSpot reviewer
Owner at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Oct 30, 2017

I used and tested BizTalk, Oracle ESB, Mule and WSO2 Integrator, all these have advantages and suites well for SOA, the best answer will be based on your needs and how is your relation with the vendor and how much you wish to pay for that.

The wish to run on cloud, on premises or hybrid, all that affects the ROI too.

About Mule and BizTalk features all have the functions you need for a SOA platform, maybe the only way to calculate the better is how much time our team can do good things with each one, that must have more weight on your decision, is like buy the fastest car on the world, but dont know how to drive that car, then the better is one you know how to drive.

In my own experience the winner when we talk about ROI is WSO2 Integrator, as is the only solution that only charges by support subscription, because license is Apache 2.0, and have many resources for a good SOA application.

it_user549993 - PeerSpot reviewer
User with 1,001-5,000 employees
Nov 5, 2017

We just implemented the hybrid integration platform, BizTalk was not among the list during the evaluation process. Major considerations are on-premise app/sys integration, on-prem and cloud, and cloud to cloud integration, with the presence of webservices and a list of APIs.

it_user625068 - PeerSpot reviewer
User at Magic
Nov 1, 2017

Rather I would suggest to evaluate “Magic xpi”

This is where you get ESB/ETL/BPM all in one solution with very competitive

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft and others in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) . Updated: November 2022.
655,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user348279 - PeerSpot reviewer
User at IBM
Oct 31, 2017

Between those 2, anything but BizTalk unless you only see MSFT on your life.
In general, i would go for a middleware key player that has a good list of connectors and also a good TCO on a 3-5 years case (IBM, Tibco or Oracle).
Where are you in terms of Cloud? It is important to know where are and which are your applications and what they should be by leveraging API's also on the Cloud.
Overall, from an ESB and API Management perspective, i would look into IBM - you can get a good sw quote for IBM too, you just need to know how to talk with your sales rep.
Have a look at Bluemix Catalog - you can have Pay-Per-Use.

reti=red with 51-200 employees
Oct 31, 2017

In either case you will be locked in by the vendor. Better to go with vendor neutral ESB

it_user624996 - PeerSpot reviewer
Architect at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Oct 31, 2017

I haven't used BizTalk. Mule is used in my company, and it is quite robust.

it_user499701 - PeerSpot reviewer
User at a tech company with 51-200 employees
Oct 31, 2017

Unfortunately we didn’t been working with provided solutions, but we currently assessments the BizTalk solution. Currently we working oracle service bus solution.

Most importance features that we focus on our assessment is stability, by the maximum transaction message that can be processing during working hours, adapters for connectivity with database or any other solutions like ERP, limitations on solution, support and training from provided company.

Senior Software Specialist at International Business Machines
Oct 30, 2017

I would suggest the customer to use IBM IIB Advanced instead of Biztalk.
Here are some reasons:

TCO - When comparing apples-to-apples, IIB is not just price competitive
Biztalk but most often provides better TCO. I would recommend the
customer to speak to his IBM sales rep to perform a Business Value
Assessment (BVA).

IIB on Cloud Offering is open:

Production support on Docker
Deploy on AWS, Azure, Bluemix, etc
Salesforce and LoopBack Request
CHEF scripts
Extremely secure hybrid cloud connectivity (Uses mutual authentication
using IIB provided certificates )

IIB on Open Source Flexibility

Free Developer Edition
Integration Community
Connector Framework
GitHub Repository

Embedded Analytics:

Analyse data in real-time
Embedded ODM
Analytics engine integration (incl. Github R node)

Enterprise grade technology that is very simple to use, lightweight,
secure and high performer:

Very easy to use and very lightweight (Full function, simple, single
package install, average size: 1.3GB);Developer Operating Systems contain
Toolkit and Server
Zero pre-reqs
Radically simplified, install < 10 mins
Simple web UI (Browser approach is lightweight and universal)
Market leading performance
MQ Flexibility
Global Cache enhancements
Web administration
Built-in unit testing
Patterns and tutorials
Business Transaction Monitoring

Designed for the Digital Transformation:
REST APIs and REST Request
Push to API Connect
Web Hooks to App Connect
MQTT Connector including SSL for IoT

More on the technical side:

Access the global cache from a graphical map - IIB’s embedded Global
Cache provides an elastic, scalable, in-memory data grid for storing
reusable data
Global Cache Performance and tuning enhancements -
1-click Push REST APIs to API Connect from the IIB Toolkit
CICS Request node support for 2 Phase Commit
TCPIP Report properties enhancements
Business Transaction Monitoring
Oracle stored procedure support in a graphical map
Callable Flows for Hybrid Cloud scenarios
Salesforce Request node
Very easy creation of JSON Schema - JSON Schema support for graphical maps
Create a REST API without needing a Swagger document
LDAP Authentication for administration changes
Web UI Activity Log view for message flows
MQTT SSL and dynamic configuration
Bulk push REST APIs to API Connect from IIB Web UI
REST Request, REST Async Request and LoopBack Request nodes
HTTP and REST enhancements – Logging, YAML support, REST APIs with
node-wide listener
Kafka Producer & Consumer: Use IIB or IIB on Cloud to interact with a
Kafka Broker providing distributed commit log based messaging service
Integration with IBM Watson IoT using MQTT
Business Transaction Monitoring tracks a message across multiple message

it_user613221 - PeerSpot reviewer
Service Designer with 10,001+ employees
Oct 30, 2017

I don't like Microsoft at all, so I never used Biztalk in my life.

it_user311613 - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Oct 30, 2017

It depends what you want. The cost over time does not matter if you make the right choice. The technology must match the requirements. You own your requirements.

Do you need cloud capabilities. Do you need strong hybrid capability to connect on premise with cloud. Do you need the best tool available to solve only on premise challenges.

Do you have a lot of custom applications that need a tool with strong deep integration capabilities. Or do you have a standard based portfolio (sap, was, Lawson, jd Edwards etc) and thus require tools with supported adapters.

Does price matter more than available resources in your area?

Write it all down and ask Integrations vendors like Microsoft, Software AG, Talend, Mule and Oracle to compete for your business case. Choose the one who delivers a great experience while trying to get your business. In the end you want a partner who understands your business and is willing to demonstrate that during the sell.

it_user261993 - PeerSpot reviewer
Gerente de Proyectos en Excelsys at a tech services company
Oct 30, 2017

I'm not using ESB.

it_user447021 - PeerSpot reviewer
Chairman and CEO at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
Oct 30, 2017

Microsoft BizTalk vs Mule ESB


it_user500010 - PeerSpot reviewer
Specialist Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Oct 30, 2017

BizTalk cannot be considered as an ESB (more like EAI/MOM)
Depending on the requirements, but general speaking, i would opt by for Mule ( AnyPoint) because is more inline with SOA requirements, ESB patterns, ...

Miguel Anselmo

it_user254310 - PeerSpot reviewer
Ingeniero de Sistemas at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Oct 30, 2017

I prefer Mule because BizTalk too much expensive and the free technologies it's the present, but the trouble it's the support at it's more expensive

Related Questions
Miriam Tover - PeerSpot reviewer
Service Delivery Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Jul 29, 2019
Hi Everyone, What do you like most about BizTalk Server? Thanks for sharing your thoughts with the community!
See 1 answer
MichaelSoliman - PeerSpot reviewer
Owner at Alopex ONE UG
Jul 29, 2019
Essentially, you can do whatever you like with these systems, and you do not have to take care about the scaling because if one server is overloaded, it just forwards the message to the next server, even if it were designated to a specific server. It weeds out the messages according to the load. If you want to scale it, you just add new servers.
Miriam Tover - PeerSpot reviewer
Service Delivery Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Jul 29, 2019
Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with BizTalk Server. What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?
See 1 answer
MichaelSoliman - PeerSpot reviewer
Owner at Alopex ONE UG
Jul 29, 2019
There is a follow-up version called Logic App which right now runs only in the Microsoft hosted Azure Cloud. We're just using JSON instead of XML which is very simple to administer and configure because it's a platform that's a server. You do not have to install anything. You just say I need some resources and Azure will do the rest for you. It's very easy to use. In Germany, however, there are very few customers using it because no one trusts putting data onto the Cloud. It's hosted by Microsoft, it's not hosted by a private cloud. That's a specific German problem, I know that the French are less restrictive, but in Germany, that's a big problem. For future releases, I'm guessing Microsoft is trying to build out Logic App, but having another server with the tool which actually rewires the workflow and optimizes the workflow using a simplification operator would be a huge step ahead of all other opposing products, like Oracle, or Talend.
Related Articles
Evgeny Belenky - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Community at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Jul 11, 2022
Hi community members, As usual, this new Community Spotlight shares with you the latest articles, questions and trending discussions from your peers. Trending See what is trending at the moment and chime in to discuss! Top 8 Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Tools 2022 Would you recommend replacing Cisco ASA Firewall with Fortinet FortiGate FG 100F due to cost reasons? What is the...
See 2 comments
Ravi Suvvari - PeerSpot reviewer
Performance and Fault-tolerance Architect with 1,001-5,000 employees
May 30, 2022
Good very informative
Jairo Willian Pereira - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Security Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Jul 11, 2022
Analyze the wave of product at Gartner Hype Cycle. EDR was good in the past. After that, MDR joined the hype and now, XDR is the trend. Wait for more in a couple of months and (sic) know the ZDR!
Netanya Carmi - PeerSpot reviewer
Content Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Apr 26, 2022
PeerSpot’s crowdsourced user review platform helps technology decision-makers around the world to better connect with peers and other independent experts who provide advice without vendor bias. Our users have ranked these solutions according to their valuable features, and discuss which features they like most and why. You can read user reviews for the Top 5 Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Tools...
Related Articles
Evgeny Belenky - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Community at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Jul 11, 2022
Community Spotlight #14 - Top XDR Tools and More
Hi community members, As usual, this new Community Spotlight shares with you the latest articles...
Netanya Carmi - PeerSpot reviewer
Content Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Apr 26, 2022
Top 5 Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Tools 2022
PeerSpot’s crowdsourced user review platform helps technology decision-makers around the world to...
Download Free Report
Download our free ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) Report and find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, and more! Updated: November 2022.
655,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.