I'm not an experienced user, but I can tell you how people do it today. So, POC is okay. In POC, there is a lot of content that you can read and figure out how it really works. But then what's more important is to understand, you know, what's the goal they would want to attain in implementing an MBPM solution like OpenText because it's a heavy tool in the first place. At the same time, the users or the organization which is looking to implement it should do a feasibility study in terms of technicalities, operational, and economic standpoint in terms of what they are trying to achieve. So if that is sorted out, they would really have an endpoint in mind, meaning when and what they would want to look at, what they would want to do, and how the solution should look for them. So, potentially, they would do all of this in advance. It is all done in advance so that they face no surprises when the implementation is done. But then what's also important is for an individual to ensure that the organization, which is going to use it in the near future, needs to expose it to all the users well in advance so that they understand the solution's capabilities, limitations, and how it's how it really works. So that there are no wrong expectations set in the overall tone at the later stage. OpenText MBPM is point solutions for a specific set of activities or a specific set of businesses. Now, just like what we do in terms of MBPM, there are industry verticals that are very specific. Some of them are PnP devices, and some of them are not compatible with certain industry practices. There are point-based solutions that cater to various requirements. So I can't just have the same scale for all of them because some of them are specific for engineering-based businesses while some of them are specific for consulting, and some of them are for various other applications. Now OpenText, as such, comes with a tight integration of many of these products. So that way, it might have an edge, but there are other products that also have integration, but point-based solutions satisfy or help businesses. Overall, I rate the product somewhere around seven out of ten.
I'm not an experienced user, but I can tell you how people do it today. So, POC is okay. In POC, there is a lot of content that you can read and figure out how it really works. But then what's more important is to understand, you know, what's the goal they would want to attain in implementing an MBPM solution like OpenText because it's a heavy tool in the first place. At the same time, the users or the organization which is looking to implement it should do a feasibility study in terms of technicalities, operational, and economic standpoint in terms of what they are trying to achieve. So if that is sorted out, they would really have an endpoint in mind, meaning when and what they would want to look at, what they would want to do, and how the solution should look for them. So, potentially, they would do all of this in advance. It is all done in advance so that they face no surprises when the implementation is done. But then what's also important is for an individual to ensure that the organization, which is going to use it in the near future, needs to expose it to all the users well in advance so that they understand the solution's capabilities, limitations, and how it's how it really works. So that there are no wrong expectations set in the overall tone at the later stage. OpenText MBPM is point solutions for a specific set of activities or a specific set of businesses. Now, just like what we do in terms of MBPM, there are industry verticals that are very specific. Some of them are PnP devices, and some of them are not compatible with certain industry practices. There are point-based solutions that cater to various requirements. So I can't just have the same scale for all of them because some of them are specific for engineering-based businesses while some of them are specific for consulting, and some of them are for various other applications. Now OpenText, as such, comes with a tight integration of many of these products. So that way, it might have an edge, but there are other products that also have integration, but point-based solutions satisfy or help businesses. Overall, I rate the product somewhere around seven out of ten.
I rate OpenText MBPM a seven out of ten.