I have utilized automation features in Bullhorn. Regarding the integration capabilities of Bullhorn, they have the marketplace partners and that works pretty well for them. However, with other partners, we recently tried to integrate Mona AI, and it didn't work out very well. My assessment of the client and candidate engagement tools within Bullhorn is that they are pretty useless for us; for example, the Pulse feature, which shows how often we've been in touch, is quite useless. We're not using any of these engagement tools. There are aspects of reporting and analytics in Bullhorn that I would appreciate seeing improved in the future. The pricing concept for Bullhorn is that you pay per user license, meaning the more you grow, the more expensive the tool gets. They introduce a new tool every year, sometimes just rebranding an old tool, and charge extra for it if you want to use it. Pricing is a huge point; it's very annoying, intransparent, and often new products come out with no pricing, needing another three, four, or five months until they announce it. We are not very happy with the pricing; everything about it is not flexible, and the pricing policy is not transparent or fair. We decided to stick with Bullhorn from the last evaluation because they really went down with the price at the last minute, so it was a price decision. However, the past two years have brought a lot of disappointments, and we will surely re-evaluate in Q2 next year, as we are open to change. It's important to mention that Bullhorn is not the technological leader in ATS software anymore; it used to be worth the price, but not anymore. My advice for organizations considering Bullhorn is to conduct a very good cost analysis, projecting a five to ten-year growth aspect to see how much it would cost if you grow as much as you wish. It's also important to consider the limitations Bullhorn has, as you need to buy a lot of software from marketplace partners to address these gaps, which can make it quite expensive. So, thoroughly analyze your requirements and see where your pain points are, only considering Bullhorn if it can offer solutions that meet your needs right now. Often, they promise solutions that still aren't delivered years later. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Bullhorn a 6.
Bullhorn is pretty user-friendly, though I had a little bit of a learning curve when I first got onto it when I worked for a big firm before venturing out on my own. The implementation team is outstanding. They make it really easy. It is not an inexpensive platform, but you get what you pay for. I would recommend it to other people, and I am just a customer that enjoys the platform. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Bullhorn a 9.
CRM solutions are designed to manage and analyze customer interactions and data throughout the customer lifecycle, aiming to improve business relationships and retention.CRM systems provide businesses with a consolidated view of customer data, enabling informed decision-making and personalized customer experiences. A robust CRM solution can streamline communication, automate workflows, and increase productivity. By integrating sales, service, and marketing, businesses can significantly...
I have utilized automation features in Bullhorn. Regarding the integration capabilities of Bullhorn, they have the marketplace partners and that works pretty well for them. However, with other partners, we recently tried to integrate Mona AI, and it didn't work out very well. My assessment of the client and candidate engagement tools within Bullhorn is that they are pretty useless for us; for example, the Pulse feature, which shows how often we've been in touch, is quite useless. We're not using any of these engagement tools. There are aspects of reporting and analytics in Bullhorn that I would appreciate seeing improved in the future. The pricing concept for Bullhorn is that you pay per user license, meaning the more you grow, the more expensive the tool gets. They introduce a new tool every year, sometimes just rebranding an old tool, and charge extra for it if you want to use it. Pricing is a huge point; it's very annoying, intransparent, and often new products come out with no pricing, needing another three, four, or five months until they announce it. We are not very happy with the pricing; everything about it is not flexible, and the pricing policy is not transparent or fair. We decided to stick with Bullhorn from the last evaluation because they really went down with the price at the last minute, so it was a price decision. However, the past two years have brought a lot of disappointments, and we will surely re-evaluate in Q2 next year, as we are open to change. It's important to mention that Bullhorn is not the technological leader in ATS software anymore; it used to be worth the price, but not anymore. My advice for organizations considering Bullhorn is to conduct a very good cost analysis, projecting a five to ten-year growth aspect to see how much it would cost if you grow as much as you wish. It's also important to consider the limitations Bullhorn has, as you need to buy a lot of software from marketplace partners to address these gaps, which can make it quite expensive. So, thoroughly analyze your requirements and see where your pain points are, only considering Bullhorn if it can offer solutions that meet your needs right now. Often, they promise solutions that still aren't delivered years later. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Bullhorn a 6.
Bullhorn is pretty user-friendly, though I had a little bit of a learning curve when I first got onto it when I worked for a big firm before venturing out on my own. The implementation team is outstanding. They make it really easy. It is not an inexpensive platform, but you get what you pay for. I would recommend it to other people, and I am just a customer that enjoys the platform. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Bullhorn a 9.