Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Coverity Logo

Coverity pros and cons

Vendor: Black Duck
3.9 out of 5
287 followers
Start review

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Coverity has an impressively low rate of false positives, allowing users to focus on genuine vulnerabilities.
The integration capabilities with Jenkins and CI systems streamline workflows effectively.
Coverity significantly enhances code quality and security with its deep analysis capabilities.
The software excels in identifying critical vulnerabilities and providing insightful reports for improved code quality.
Coverity's scalability and stability ensure consistent performance without downtime issues.

CONS

They could improve usability including setup process and customization options, making it more user-friendly and easier to integrate with other systems.
The setup process is time-consuming, and the executable file size could be optimized to enhance usability in environments like Docker.
Integration with popular IDEs and more rules for better detection of vulnerabilities and security errors are needed.
There are concerns about false positives and the effectiveness of checkers, which can waste time and resources.
The price is a constant issue, and some features like customization and integration options are limited compared to other tools.
 

Coverity Pros review quotes

VV
Apr 26, 2024
Coverity integrates with issue-tracking systems like Jira and provides email notifications, alerts, and other features.
reviewer1428837 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 30, 2020
The most valuable feature is that there were not a whole lot of false positives, at least on the codebases that I looked at.
VV
Oct 12, 2021
One of the most valuable features is Contributing Events. That particular feature helps the developer understand the root cause of a defect. So you can locate the starting point of the defect and figure out exactly how it is being exploited.
Learn what your peers think about Coverity. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
BL
Apr 3, 2024
In my opinion, the most effective Coverity feature for identifying critical vulnerabilities is the extra checks, which offers deep analysis.
Md. Shahriar Hussain - PeerSpot reviewer
May 3, 2024
The reporting feature is up to the mark.
AP
Nov 9, 2023
The interface of Coverity is quite good, and it is also easy to use.
it_user1316571 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 2, 2020
Coverity is quite stable and we haven’t had any issues or any downtime.
Yantao Zhao - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 4, 2019
The features I find most valuable is that our entire company can publish the analysis results into our central space.
GR
Jun 23, 2023
Coverity gives advisory and deviation features, which are some of the parts I liked.
Arun Dahiphale - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 20, 2024
The solution has improved our code quality and security very well.
 

Coverity Cons review quotes

VV
Apr 26, 2024
Coverity concerns its dashboards and reporting.
reviewer1428837 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 30, 2020
It should be easier to specify your own validation routines and sanitation routines.
VV
Oct 12, 2021
Right now, the Coverity executable is around 1.2GB to download. If they can reduce it to approximately 600 or 700MB, that would be great. If they decrease the executable, it will be much easier to work in an environment like Docker.
Learn what your peers think about Coverity. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
BL
Apr 3, 2024
We're currently facing a primary challenge with automation using Coverity. Each developer has a license and can perform manual checks, and we also have a nightly build that analyzes the entire software. The main issue is that the tool can't look behind submodules in our code base, so it doesn't see changes stored there.
Md. Shahriar Hussain - PeerSpot reviewer
May 3, 2024
The reporting tool integration process is sometimes slow.
AP
Nov 9, 2023
Coverity takes a lot of time to dereference null pointers.
it_user1316571 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 2, 2020
I would like to see integration with popular IDEs, such as Eclipse.
Yantao Zhao - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 4, 2019
The setup takes very long.
GR
Jun 23, 2023
SCM integration is very poor in Coverity.
Arun Dahiphale - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 20, 2024
It would be great if we could customize the rules to focus on critical issues.