Coverity Logo

Coverity pros and cons

Vendor: Synopsys
3.9 out of 5
328 followers
Post review
 

Coverity Pros review quotes

SH
Sep 30, 2020
The most valuable feature is that there were not a whole lot of false positives, at least on the codebases that I looked at.
VV
Oct 12, 2021
One of the most valuable features is Contributing Events. That particular feature helps the developer understand the root cause of a defect. So you can locate the starting point of the defect and figure out exactly how it is being exploited.
AP
Nov 9, 2023
The interface of Coverity is quite good, and it is also easy to use.
Learn what your peers think about Coverity. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
NS
Apr 2, 2020
Coverity is quite stable and we haven’t had any issues or any downtime.
YZ
Sep 4, 2019
The features I find most valuable is that our entire company can publish the analysis results into our central space.
GR
Jun 23, 2023
Coverity gives advisory and deviation features, which are some of the parts I liked.
Arun Dahiphale - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 20, 2024
The solution has improved our code quality and security very well.
Jaile Sebes - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 1, 2022
We were very comfortable with the initial setup.
IC
May 11, 2023
The most valuable feature of Coverity is its software security feature called the Checker. If you share some vulnerability or weakness then the software can find any potential security bug or defect. The code integration tool enables some secure coding standards and implements some Checkers for Live Duo. So we can enable secure coding and Azure in this tool. So in our software, we can make sure our software combines some industry supervised data.
RZ
May 5, 2023
It's very stable.
 

Coverity Cons review quotes

SH
Sep 30, 2020
It should be easier to specify your own validation routines and sanitation routines.
VV
Oct 12, 2021
Right now, the Coverity executable is around 1.2GB to download. If they can reduce it to approximately 600 or 700MB, that would be great. If they decrease the executable, it will be much easier to work in an environment like Docker.
AP
Nov 9, 2023
Coverity takes a lot of time to dereference null pointers.
Learn what your peers think about Coverity. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
NS
Apr 2, 2020
I would like to see integration with popular IDEs, such as Eclipse.
YZ
Sep 4, 2019
The setup takes very long.
GR
Jun 23, 2023
SCM integration is very poor in Coverity.
Arun Dahiphale - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 20, 2024
It would be great if we could customize the rules to focus on critical issues.
Jaile Sebes - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 1, 2022
We'd like it to be faster.
IC
May 11, 2023
We actually specified several checkers, but we found some checkers had a higher false positive rate. I think this is a problem. Because we have to waste some time is really the issue because the issue is not an issue. I mean, the tool pauses or an issue, but the same issue is the filter now.Some check checkers cannot find some issues, but sometimes they find issues that are not relevant, right, that are not really issues. Some customisation mechanism can be added in the next release so that we can define our Checker. The Modelling feature provided by Coverity helps in finding more information for potential issues but it is not mature enough, it should be mature. The fast testing feature for security testing campaign can be added as well. So if you correctly integrate it with the training team, maybe you can help us to find more potential issues.
RZ
May 5, 2023
Some features are not performing well, like duplicate detection and switch case situations.