Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trend Vision One comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 15, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Security
Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
97
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (10th)
Trend Vision One
Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
7th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (4th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (3rd), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category, the mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security is 3.3%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trend Vision One is 6.9%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
 

Featured Reviews

AhmedEl-Tayeb - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 23, 2022
Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services
Some of our products have a first and second line owned by us. We are giving support services to the customers instead of the vendor. Some other products are supported directly by the technology vendor, however. Technical support from the vendor is very bad. Usually, when the customer submits a ticket, they put a severity level on the case. Whenever the case is very important, and there is a real malfunction in the product on the customer side, and there is something down that needs someone to have a look immediately, it takes more time than it should to even engage with the customer. When someone has to contact the customer and have a remote session within the customer environment, they sometimes lack in terms of communication with the customer. The support centers are located in the East and not all have an acceptable level of English in order to communicate directly with the customer.
AndrewAdams - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 18, 2023
The observed attack techniques feature lets you see what an attacker is doing or how malicious code is operating
I like Vision One's observed attack techniques feature. It lets you see what an attacker is doing, how they have tried to exploit a machine, or how malicious code is operating. It helps us discover indicators of compromise so we can write better rules for detection. Migrating to the Vision One platform helped us because we no longer need to look at eight different screens to find data. It's all just consolidated into one location. Having everything in one place is critical. I've been in the industry for almost a decade now, and it's a struggle to find that single pane of glass for all my alerts, logs, and anomalies like random users clicking on a link or downloading a file. It's nice to have it all in one location. Having centralized visibility saves the time we would spend checking various systems to look for things. I can also correlate data points more effectively and make data-driven decisions about the remediation and mitigation of any internal or external threats discovered. The executive dashboard is nice. It's consolidating all of the tools into the Vision One platform, giving you a high-level overview. Executives love dashboards and pretty colors. The ability to drill down into XDR detection from the executive dashboard his handy. I don't have to go fishing. We get an alert that says a machine did X, and I can fire it up. It's on the dashboard, so I can click on that machine, and it lets me drill down into the logs. It cuts down on the time required to do any kind of forensic analysis on anomalous alerts or behavior. The Risk Index gives you an overview of the risk and how it compares with others in your industry. It's nice to be able to quantify the risk, and it enables you to justify the spending on these tools to your executives by showing that it pays off. Also, if we start plugging in more data points and the risk score goes up, we can conclude that there are some issues with the new data source that we just hooked up to our platform. The goal is to have a risk level of zero, but that will be hard to achieve.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This product has the capability to check a wide range of vulnerabilities and devices."
"The solution is broken down into different components from the portals. Web filtering, which is an added feature has been great for us."
"The reporting capabilities are a valuable feature. In enables more visibility on our network."
"The most valuable feature is the centralized console where everything can be controlled by the administration."
"It can be deployed quickly, and it's scalable. Those are the two advantages of it."
"The most valuable features are reporting from the ePO console and the advanced threat protection (ATP)."
"The solution provides a data view of the Alpha systems with Trellix installs and makes small changes to the central management console. Nothing on the endpoints themselves works, but it focuses more on the management side."
"The most valuable features are the adaptive tech on McAfee."
"When we purchased Vision One, what set it apart was that it wasn't a traditional signature-based antivirus. It's a process-aware solution that provides real-time protection. That was a big differentiator three years ago, but now it's a given that every AV provider should be doing that. It combines signature-based telemetry with behavioral awareness and a detection-based solution, making it a good solution for us."
"We've found the pricing to be reasonable."
"The user interface is very good."
"The most important thing for us as a customer is that we can spend more time in other places as it's simpler to have that overview. We have much more time for other tasks."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"The proactive approach is the best feature."
"We are very impressed with the single pane of glass visibility that Trend Micro XDR provides."
"Drilling down further, we can analyze how our users are utilizing their workstations, including the websites they visit."
 

Cons

"We know that McAfee isn't the best antivirus and it can't protect us 100%, although we are okay with the level of protection that it gives us."
"Trying to move away from the signature model for antivirus and malware blocking is something that would be nice. Instead of having to update every day, which is signature-based, moving to more of a kernel or architecture-based model would probably be beneficial."
"Users can just install software into their computers. We need some sort of application control system that, if there are any pieces of software that are not whitelisted, then the solution could flag it or maybe alert the administers. That would be very helpful."
"We’re facing remote installation issues sometimes:"
"Currently, Trellix Endpoint Security can't find the running mutexes, while other open-source products can do it."
"The endpoint has room for improvement because it's restrictive, it's very sensitive. Sometimes it can delete something that you need and so sometimes you have to disable the antivirus."
"McAfee GW Security and McAfee Child Safety need some improvement as they are relatively new."
"When it runs in the background of the endpoint, the devices get slowed down for some applications."
"Reporting could be a little bit better. They are working on it, and it is getting better."
"The information captured by Trend Vision One needs to be more detailed."
"The solution only supports Windows and Mac. It would be helpful if it could support other OS, such as Linux."
"The agent system is very slow, it needs to improve its performance."
"The support documentation could be more comprehensive."
"The support should be improved."
"I would like to have more integration with mobile device management."
"A room for improvement is Trend Micro XDR's website. It's a very complicated website since finding the right point one wants to see is difficult."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is very high. It is higher than its competitors, and it should be less."
"The pricing is great and licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."
"Trellix may cost around $46 to $47 for a single license without an EDR."
"Pricing is fair."
"The price of McAfee is pretty similar to Symantec, and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"There is a one-year and a three-year license available for this solution, we are currently on a three-year license."
"I am happy with the pricing."
"I would rate the cost as four to five, considering it's normal compared to other products. I find it nominal and worth the money."
"It's relatively well-priced."
"The pricing is competitive, and the cost aligns with the features we receive."
"The solution is fairly priced."
"Trend Micro XDR has a good price, and on a scale of one to five, I would rate it a four out of five in terms of price."
"From a pricing standpoint, they're a really good negotiator and they'll work with you."
"Vision One's pricing is extremely competitive. They're probably the lowest-cost provider that has this feature set."
"They've introduced a credit system, where we purchase credits and then allocate them to the specific services we need active."
"Trend Micro recently switched from a license-based pricing model to a credit system, which caused some initial frustration during my renewal."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.
801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
39%
Government
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Educational Organization
29%
Computer Software Company
18%
Healthcare Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?
It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Endpoint Security?
The solution is not an expensive tool. Compared to other options, it's mostly average-priced. I've deployed it for customers ranging from 100 nodes to over 5,000 nodes. Its renewal prices are very ...
What do you like most about Trend Micro XDR?
I appreciate the value of real-time activity monitoring.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trend Micro XDR?
Product names are changing all the time. Lots of changes in the last three years. They introduced the concept of credits, too, which did not make anything easier. It's also easy to underestimate th...
What needs improvement with Trend Micro XDR?
The SOAR features (Security Playbooks) are quite limited. At the moment, it is impossible to execute a simple piece of Python code that would pull or push something to an API, for example. While yo...
 

Also Known As

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Total Protection for Endpoint, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, MCAFEE Complete Endpoint Protection
Trend Micro XDR, Trend Micro XDR for Users, Trend Vision One - XDR for Networks
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Panasonic North America, Decathlon, Fischer Homes, Banijay Benelux, Unigel, DHR Health,
Find out what your peers are saying about Trellix Endpoint Security vs. Trend Vision One and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.