TIBCO Cloud Integration vs webMethods.io comparison

TIBCO and IBM are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. TIBCO is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.1. TIBCO holds a 1.1% mindshare in PaaS, compared to IBM’s 8.6% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of TIBCO users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

TIBCO Cloud Integration

Read 3 TIBCO Cloud Integration reviews

149 Views
99 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 92 webMethods.io reviews

1,867 Views
649 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

TIBCO Cloud Integration

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

TIBCO Cloud Integration and webMethods.io are two leading integration platforms. According to user reviews, webMethods.io seems to have the upper hand in advanced features, while TIBCO Cloud Integration is favored for its pricing and support.

Features: Users value TIBCO Cloud Integration for its ease of use, scalability, and robust data transformation capabilities. webMethods.io is praised for its advanced integration features, extensive API management, and comprehensive workflow automation. While both are strong in features, webMethods.io has a slight edge for more complex scenarios.

Room for Improvement: Reviews suggest TIBCO Cloud Integration could benefit from more pre-built connectors, enhanced monitoring tools, and more comprehensive documentation. webMethods.io users desire better documentation, a more intuitive design, and faster performance enhancements. TIBCO seems easier to navigate, but webMethods.io has rich feature sets needing refinement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TIBCO Cloud Integration users report a straightforward deployment process and reliable customer service. webMethods.io users find the deployment process more involved but find responsive support helpful. TIBCO stands out for simplicity in deployment, while webMethods.io garners praise for its responsive service.

Pricing and ROI: TIBCO Cloud Integration is noted for competitive pricing and positive ROI due to low setup costs and efficient operation. webMethods.io, although seen as pricier, delivers substantial ROI from its advanced functionalities. Users feel webMethods.io’s higher cost is justified by its feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed TIBCO Cloud Integration vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO Cloud Integration vs. webMethods.io

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

TIBCO Cloud Integration

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

16th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th), API Management (9th), Cloud Data Integration (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of TIBCO Cloud Integration is 1.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 8.6%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

NarendraThota

Vice President of Technology Services at SAge IT inc

A product that is easy to install and offers good stability to users

The API part of the solution is an area in the solution where improvements are made since I see that TIBCO is currently trying to revamp its tool by focusing more on redesigning it. There was a tool called Mashery, which is an API management tool that was acquired by TIBCO. TIBCO Cloud Integration is not a user-friendly tool when it comes to the installation phase or for maintaining the systems since its architecture is really complex. I think in the UK, one of the major telecom providers for whom I had done the infrastructure setup uses TIBCO Cloud Integration. Basically, TIBCO Cloud Integration is a bit difficult to install and manage the platform, but I feel there are improvements in the tool's latest version, especially on the API management side. Instead of moving to the higher version and converting the older version of TIBCO Cloud Integration or the legacy platform covered under TIBCO, they still use it because the architecture is completely different, and the components that the product has are completely different from what the new version of the product offers, making it one of the major reasons why TIBCO is coming up with a new version of the product that will be released in the upcoming year. The legacy platform of TIBCO will run on the cloud directly. TIBCO plans to develop a unified tool that is supported on the cloud and in an on-premises environment.

Read full review

MohanPrasad

Senior Consultant at Brillio

Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost

webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I am really impressed by TIBCO's integration of any level of complexity."

"I like that it is a very good integration tool with many other things. TIBCO is very good for cloud integration"

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"A product with good API and EDI components."

"ActiveTransfer lets us maintain the file in the staging area before we transfer it. After that, we can remove the file to make sure that the reconciliation process is done. Sometimes we will zip and unzip the files, but if we have a GKB file, we often ignore it."

"What I like best about webMethods Integration Server is its portfolio of connectors."

"The product is powerful, straightforward, and easy to use."

"The product is very stable."

"We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting."

"The comprehensiveness and depth of Integration Servers' connectors to packaged apps and custom apps is unlimited. They have a connector for everything. If they don't, you can build it yourself. Or oftentimes, if there is value for other customers as well, you can talk with webMethods about creating a new adapter for you."

"Within the new version, webMethods API Gateway gives us an end-to-end lifecycle from the creation of the API up into the development, deployment, and promotion into production/live. The current end-to-end lifecycle of the API gives us enough authority and governance of the API. We know what are currently live services, what is in the testing stage of development, and what version that has been commissioned. So, the full life cycle itself gives us full authority and governance of the API."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"TIBCO Cloud Integration is not a user-friendly tool when it comes to the installation phase or for maintaining the systems since its architecture is really complex."

"Integrations could be better. Although integration is good, we have faced some block issues."

"The deployment was rather complicated."

"Need to see more API portal features like monetizing APIs and private cloud readiness."

"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."

"We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics."

"The on-premises setup can be difficult."

"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."

"The certifications and learning resources are not exposed openly enough. For instance, they have a trial version which comes with only a few basic features, and I think that community-wise they need to offer more free or open spaces where developers can feel encouraged to experiment."

"t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData."

"The logging capability has room for improvement. That way, we could keep a history of all the transactions. It would be helpful to be able to get to that without having to build a standalone solution to do so."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We don't pay for a license."

"Pricing has to be negotiated with the local Software AG representative. SAG can always prepare an appropriate pricing model for every client."

"I do see a lack of capabilities inside of the monetization area for them. They have a cloud infrastructure that is pay per use type of a thing. If you already use 1,000 transactions per se, then you can be charged and billed. I see room for improvement there for their side on that particular capability of the monetization."

"I signed a three-year deal with them. It is a yearly locked-in price for the next three years."

"The solution's development license is free for three to six months. We have to pay for other things."

"Always plan five years ahead and don’t jeopardize the quality of your project by dropping items from the bill of materials."

"The pricing and licensing costs for webMethods are very high, which is the only reason that we might switch to another product."

"Currently, the licensing solution for this product is pretty straightforward. The way that Software AG has moved in their licensing agreements is very understandable. It is very easy for you to see where things land. Like most vendors today, they are transaction based. Therefore, just having a good understanding of how many transactions that you are doing a year would be very wise. Luckily, there are opportunities to work with the vendor to get a good understanding of how many transactions you have and what is the right limit for you to fall under."

"It is a cost-effective solution."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

12%

Real Estate/Law Firm

11%

Consumer Goods Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about TIBCO Cloud Integration?

The product's initial setup phase was easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TIBCO Cloud Integration?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TIBCO Cloud Integration?

I mainly use TIBCO Cloud Integration for iPaaS platforms, SaaS connectors, and SaaS connectivity that you have. The solution can be deployed on the cloud and on an on-premises model, so you can go ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs TIBCO Cloud Integration

Compared 29% of the time

TIBCO BusinessWorks vs TIBCO Cloud Integration

Compared 23% of the time

Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs TIBCO Cloud Integration

Compared 19% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs TIBCO Cloud Integration

Compared 14% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs TIBCO Cloud Integration

Compared 14% of the time

More TIBCO Cloud Integration Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

June 2025

Download TIBCO Cloud Integration product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

May 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

TIBCO Cloud Integration, built on open-source technologies, can connect cloud, on-premises, and IoT edge applications. It has a drag-and-drop and API-led design approach and a deploy-anywhere model.

TIBCO

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

NASA, T-Mobile, EagleView, Air France KLM, Caesars Entertainment

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO Cloud Integration vs. webMethods.io

April 2025

Free Report: TIBCO Cloud Integration vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about TIBCO Cloud Integration vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our TIBCO Cloud Integration vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.