TIBCO BusinessWorks vs Upsolver comparison

"We are using only plugins for the database and SAP."

"The solution is stable. We haven't had any serious technical issues."

"Good TIBCO BusinessWorks features are the admin console and the ability to roll back to the previous version."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten…On a scale from one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy, I rate the initial setup a nine."

"The Business Studio interface based on SCA Standards helps to show the business logic at first look and improve code maintenance."

"The solution is very scalable. It can handle a lot. We have encryption plus integration servers running on that platform currently."

"It is a very robust system."

"We use the solution to develop applications."

"It was easy to use and set up, with a nearly no-code interface that relied mostly on drag-and-drop functionality."

"The most prominent feature of Upsolver is its function as an ETL tool, allowing data to be moved across platforms and different data technologies."

"Customer service is excellent, and I would rate it between eight point five to nine out of ten."

"Challenges with TIBCO BusinessWorks were mainly due to unclear documentation, but these were overcome by referring to comprehensive documents and raising tickets with TIBCO support."

"The learning curve takes time compared to webMethods."

"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."

"The creation of XSDs should be much simpler."

"A possible improvement could be to give the capability to use different profiles for each AppNode when an application is deployed on an AppSpace."

"The cost has room for improvement."

"Technical support is average. It's not the best."

"Performance and latency could be enhanced. Additionally, having signaling stack support would be beneficial."

"On the stability side, I would rate it seven out of ten. Using multiple cloud providers and data engineering technologies creates complexity, and managing different plugins is not always easy, but they are working on it."

"There is room for improvement in query tuning."

"Upsolver excels in ETL and data aggregation, while ThoughtSpot is strong in natural language processing for querying datasets. Combining these tools can be very effective: Upsolver handles aggregation and ETL, and ThoughtSpot allows for natural language queries. There’s potential for highlighting these integrations in the future."

"I think BusinessWorks is more expensive compared to other products. We have the ELA, so at least we have some sort of bargain or discount with that. But for a start-up, it's very expensive compared to other ESBs."

"The solution is too expensive. It's one of the most expensive solutions out there, particularly because there are so many open-source competitors on the market. I don't know the exact numbers, however."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"I don't have the prices of the products, but I know that TIBCO is not a cheap solution. I think that this solution is more suitable for large companies because I don't think that small- or medium-sized companies would have the money for this solution. WSO2 has the community version for free, so many of the smaller companies can use it. I'm not sure what the prices are for support, though, so I suppose the support for WSO2 is not cheap either."

"It is a bit expensive for medium-sized companies. If you are migrating from the current version to the container-supported version, it is quite expensive. The existing licensing will not work because the product platform itself is different."

"The cost depends on the components required."

"The payments made for service are the only addition to the standard licensing fees that we pay for the solution."

"TIBCO BusinessWorks is expensive."

"Upsolver is affordable at approximately $225 per terabyte per year."