TIBCO BusinessWorks vs Upsolver comparison

"We are using only plugins for the database and SAP."

"One of the most valuable features is that it's a simple development. It takes a short time to get services to work."

"It is very valuable for my work, helping me communicate with other branches, parse data, and change data formats to respond to the front channels with the correct format."

"It is user friendly, it's not complex."

"The initial setup of TIBCO BusinessWorks was straightforward since we have used the solution in our organization for a long time."

"Good TIBCO BusinessWorks features are the admin console and the ability to roll back to the previous version."

"The solution is stable. We haven't had any serious technical issues."

"The ability to link to different technologies is valuable to us."

"The most prominent feature of Upsolver is its function as an ETL tool, allowing data to be moved across platforms and different data technologies."

"Customer service is excellent, and I would rate it between eight point five to nine out of ten."

"It was easy to use and set up, with a nearly no-code interface that relied mostly on drag-and-drop functionality."

"The communication protocols could be improved."

"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."

"I'd like to see a new cloud approach in the next release. They need to work on integrations, stability and management issues on their cloud platform."

"The cost has room for improvement."

"The container-based image is too large and this makes auto-scaling difficult."

"This solution's cloud could be improved. I don't know whether it was because we didn't have the internal expertise or if it was the product itself, but since they came later—I think only two or three years into the cloud—after many other iPaaS that had been in the cloud for longer, I feel that maybe they haven't matured in terms of the cloud."

"Challenges with TIBCO BusinessWorks were mainly due to unclear documentation, but these were overcome by referring to comprehensive documents and raising tickets with TIBCO support."

"They don't support out of the box - you have to buy adapters or you have to have the technology."

"Upsolver excels in ETL and data aggregation, while ThoughtSpot is strong in natural language processing for querying datasets. Combining these tools can be very effective: Upsolver handles aggregation and ETL, and ThoughtSpot allows for natural language queries. There’s potential for highlighting these integrations in the future."

"There is room for improvement in query tuning."

"On the stability side, I would rate it seven out of ten. Using multiple cloud providers and data engineering technologies creates complexity, and managing different plugins is not always easy, but they are working on it."

"TIBCO BusinessWorks is a very expensive solution."

"Licensing scheme is too rigid"

"My understanding is that the licensing is very costly."

"The cost depends on the components required."

"TIBCO BusinessWorks is expensive."

"I don't have the prices of the products, but I know that TIBCO is not a cheap solution. I think that this solution is more suitable for large companies because I don't think that small- or medium-sized companies would have the money for this solution. WSO2 has the community version for free, so many of the smaller companies can use it. I'm not sure what the prices are for support, though, so I suppose the support for WSO2 is not cheap either."

"The product is not cheap."

"TIBCO licensing is yearly and very costly for a company like ours."

"Upsolver is affordable at approximately $225 per terabyte per year."