Splunk Observability Cloud vs Watchman Monitoring comparison

Splunk and Watchman Monitoring are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Splunk is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.7, while Watchman Monitoring is ranked #99. Splunk holds a 1.7% mindshare in IM, compared to Watchman Monitoring’s 0.0% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Splunk users are willing to recommend the solution.

Splunk Observability Cloud

Read 57 Splunk Observability Cloud reviews

5,348 Views
1,979 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Watchman Monitoring

60 Views
60 Comparison Views

Splunk Observability Cloud

Watchman Monitoring

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Splunk Observability Cloud and Watchman Monitoring are competitors in IT monitoring. Splunk has the upper hand in scalability and support, while Watchman Monitoring stands out with its specialized features at a higher price point.

Features: Splunk Observability Cloud offers real-time analytics, customizable dashboards, and a comprehensive view of system performance. Watchman Monitoring provides proactive alerts, detailed reporting capabilities, and a focus on the unique needs of IT professionals.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Watchman Monitoring has a straightforward deployment process and highly responsive customer service. Splunk Observability Cloud offers extensive documentation and support resources, although it might require more time for full deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Splunk Observability Cloud uses a flexible pricing model with an emphasis on scalability and long-term ROI. Watchman Monitoring presents a higher initial cost, valued for its specialized feature set, targeting niche monitoring needs with perceived ROI over time.

To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,140 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Splunk Observability Cloud

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (8th), Network Monitoring Software (6th), Cloud Monitoring Software (7th), Container Management (6th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (2nd)

Watchman Monitoring

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

99th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Splunk Observability Cloud is 1.7%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Watchman Monitoring is 0.0%, down from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Lakshmi Padaga

Java Developer at U.S. Bank

Collaborates performance metrics with log data to pinpoint the exact cause of issues and offers error detection

Splunk APM is a robust tool with many capabilities. There are always areas for potential improvement to enhance its functionality and user experience. For Splunk APM, there could be simplified navigation, like streamlining the user interface to make navigation more intuitive for our users, especially those new to APM, which can enhance usability. We can provide more customization options for dashboards and visualizations to help users tailor the platform to their specific needs. There could be more integration capabilities with a wider range of third-party tools and platforms would also be beneficial. By focusing on these areas, Splunk APM can enhance its value proposition, improve user satisfaction, and better meet the evolving needs of organizations monitoring their application performance.

Read full review

Use Watchman Monitoring?

Share your opinion

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SignalFx?

The most valuable feature is dashboard creation.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SignalFx?

Regarding dashboard customization, while Splunk has many dashboard building options, customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and pr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SignalFx?

The solution involves observability in general, such as Application Performance Monitoring, and generally addresses digital applications, web applications, sites, and mobile applications. I worked ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

Sentry vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Cribl vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

SigNoz vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud

July 2025

Download Splunk Observability Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

July 2025

Download Watchman Monitoring product report

Also Known As

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM), Splunk Synthetic Monitoring

No data available

Overview

Splunk Observability Cloud offers sophisticated log searching, data integration, and customizable dashboards. With rapid deployment and ease of use, this cloud service enhances monitoring capabilities across IT infrastructures for comprehensive end-to-end visibility.

Focused on enhancing performance management and security, Splunk Observability Cloud supports environments through its data visualization and analysis tools. Users appreciate its robust application performance monitoring and troubleshooting insights. However, improvements in integrations, interface customization, scalability, and automation are needed. Users find value in its capabilities for infrastructure and network monitoring, as well as log analytics, albeit cost considerations and better documentation are desired. Enhancements in real-time monitoring and network protection are also noted as areas for development.

What are the key features?

Log Searching: Efficiently search and analyze logs from various sources.
Data Integration: Seamlessly integrate with multiple environments.
Dashboard Customization: Tailor dashboards to specific monitoring needs.
Monitoring Capabilities: Provides comprehensive insights into application performance.
Security Features: Analyze and address security threats across systems.
Visualization Tools: Enhance data analysis and system performance optimization.

Why consider this for ROI?

Comprehensive Visibility: Gain complete insights into IT infrastructure.
Performance Optimization: Improve overall system performance and efficiency.
Rapid Deployment: Quick setup to meet organization demands swiftly.
Enhanced Security: Strengthen security measures through detailed analytics.

In industries, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for security management by analyzing logs from detection systems, offering real-time alerts and troubleshooting for cloud-native applications. It is leveraged for machine data analysis, improving infrastructure visibility and supporting network and application performance management efforts.

Splunk

Watchman Monitoring is a comprehensive monitoring solution that tracks system performance and health, helping to identify and resolve issues proactively.

With real-time alerts and notifications, it enables immediate action to prevent potential problems. Its user-friendly interface and customizable features make it suitable for businesses of all sizes.

Valuable features include proactive monitoring, real-time alerts, comprehensive reporting, ease of use, and seamless integration with other tools and platforms.

It allows for detecting and addressing issues before they become major problems, ensuring smooth operations and minimizing downtime.

Watchman Monitoring

Sample Customers

Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara

1. Apple Inc. 2. Microsoft Corporation 3. Google LLC 4. Amazon.com, Inc. 5. Facebook, Inc. 6. IBM Corporation 7. Cisco Systems, Inc. 8. Intel Corporation 9. Oracle Corporation 10. Adobe Inc. 11. Salesforce.com, Inc. 12. Dell Technologies Inc. 13. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company 14. VMware, Inc. 15. SAP SE 16. Accenture plc 17. AT&T Inc. 18. Verizon Communications Inc. 19. T-Mobile US, Inc. 20. Comcast Corporation 21. Netflix, Inc. 22. Twitter, Inc. 23. Uber Technologies, Inc. 24. Airbnb, Inc. 25. Lyft, Inc. 26. Spotify Technology S.A. 27. Tesla, Inc. 28. General Electric Company 29. The Walt Disney Company 30. Coca-Cola Company 31. Procter & Gamble Company 32. Johnson & Johnson

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

July 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.