SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Venn Software comparison

Sonar and Venn Software are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Sonar is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while Venn Software is ranked #58. Sonar holds a 22.4% mindshare in AS, compared to Venn Software’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Sonar users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Venn Software users who would recommend it.

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Read 116 SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reviews

43,055 Views
27,555 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Venn Software

Read 3 Venn Software reviews

782 Views
141 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Venn Software

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

SonarQube Server and Venn Software are competitors in the software quality and development security market. In code analysis and continuous inspection, SonarQube appears to have an advantage, while Venn Software is stronger in security and data protection.

Features:SonarQube Server offers extensive plugin support, continuous code quality monitoring, and integrates well with CI/CD pipelines. Venn Software provides advanced data encryption, risk mitigation tools, and compliance management, making it a preferable choice for organizations needing robust data protection.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:SonarQube Server provides flexible deployment options, including both on-premises and cloud setups with solid integration support. Venn Software offers straightforward cloud deployment with a focus on security during implementation. Both have strong customer service, with Venn being more attractive for those prioritizing security.

Pricing and ROI:SonarQube Server typically involves lower initial setup costs and delivers high ROI through improved code quality and reduced maintenance. Venn Software, with higher initial costs, offers substantial ROI by reducing security breaches and compliance issues. SonarQube's lower entry cost is appealing for businesses focused on code quality, while Venn justifies its pricing with security benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Venn Software Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Venn Software

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

116

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)

Venn Software

Ranking in Application Security Tools

58th

Average Rating

9.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Remote Access (31st), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (33rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is 22.4%, down from 26.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Venn Software is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Sthembiso Zondi

Head of Software Engineering at ronaldmariah@gmail.com

Consistent improvements in code quality and security with effective integration and reliable technical support

The features of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) that I find most useful are the suggestions received from reviewing the code. When they review the code, they provide suggestions on how to fix it, and we find those very useful from a development perspective. We use SonarQube Server's (formerly SonarQube) centralized management and visualization of code quality metrics on the dashboard because that's the executive dashboard that we send to the executives to show where we are in terms of quality, security, and where the company can improve. We use that for organizational improvement purposes. The ability to tailor metrics tracking in SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) has been beneficial to my team. There are team-specific dashboards which are related to specific repositories they utilize, and we have that aggregative dashboard that shows the whole organization's performance. We can drill down per specific repository, which makes it easier for the team to improve specific things.

Read full review

reviewer2110356

Growth Specialist at Digitrends Soultions

Great for hybrid workers, minimizes latency and delivers great performance

We haven't encountered major issues with the solution. We are really happy that we decided to purchase Venn Software, although they are quite new. The initial setup is seamless. It's not overly complex. In our experience, for the most part, the solution is reliable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches. That said, the performance could be a bit better. We'd like to see a bit more done with the deployment capabilities. The solution needs to offer better local or regional support to cater to offshore users.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I follow Quality Gate's graduation model within organization, and it is extremely helpful for me to benchmark products."

"SonarQube is one of the more popular solutions because it supports 29 languages."

"I like that it's easy to navigate not just in terms of code findings but you can actually see them in the context of your source code because it gives you a copy of your code with the items that it found and highlights them. You can see it directly in your code, so you can easily go back and make the corrections in the code. It basically finds the problems for you and tells you where they are."

"I like that it helps us maintain our work quality and code security."

"Any developer can easily identify issues using the process flow or steps provided by SonarQube. In terms of integration, SonarQube makes it quite easy, simplifying the steps for users."

"Integrate it into the developers' workbench so that they can bench check their code against what will be done in the server-based audit version."

"The most valuable features are the segregation containment and the suspension of product services."

"SonarQube: Recording of issues over a period of time, with an indication of the addition in the new issues or the reduction of existing issues (which were fixed)."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pros

"Since the software is launched directly from the computer, not remotely delivered, it has minimized latency and response time."

"It allows us to improve our security and prevent company files and data leaks."

"We don't need to go to the physical office, and it only requires minimal supervision or assistance from our IT Team."

Cons

"If there was an official Docker image of SonarQube that could easily integrate into the pipeline would help the user to plug in and plug out and use it directly without any custom configuration. I am not sure if this is being offered already in an update but it would be very helpful."

"Expression of common vulnerabilities and exposures is not always current."

"We're in the process of figuring out how to automate the workflow for QA audit controls on it. I think that's perhaps an area that we could use some buffing. We're a Kubernetes shop, so there are some things that aren't direct fits, which we're struggling with on the component Docker side. But nothing major."

"This is a well-rounded solution, however, some features could be made available on the free version. The price of the solution could be reduced."

"There is no automation. You need to put the code there and test. You then pull the results and put them back in the development environment. There is no integration with the development environment. We would like it to be integrated with our development environment, which is basically the CI/CD pipeline or the IDE that we have."

"The tool needs to be more compatible with C/C++ language"

"It should be user-friendly."

"There is need for support for the additional languages and ease of use in adding new rules for detecting issues."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) cons

"We'd like to see a bit more done with the deployment capabilities."

"It would be better to have the back end more efficient."

"Currently, Venn only uses two platforms/applications: Windows and Mac. It would be great if they could also add more platforms since some BYOD employees might be using an application other than Windows or Mac - for example, Linux."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is both a free and licensed version. The free version has limitations on development languages and support."

"SonarQube is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."

"It's an open-source solution, with no additional costs."

"We're using an older version because it is the open-source flavor of it and we can continue using it at no cost. We're not paying any licensing at all, which was another factor in choosing this route so that we can learn and grow with it and not be committed to licenses and other similar things. If we choose to get something else, we have to relearn, but we don't have to relicense. Basically, we're paying no license costs."

"SonarQube price is a little bit higher than Kiuwan's. Kiuwan also gives a little bit of flexibility in terms of pricing."

"We have a license with 125,000 lines of code. We did not purchase a lot of lines but it is specific to our code environment."

"The product’s price is lower than Veracode’s price."

"My guess is that we have a yearly subscription. We use it quite extensively, so a monthly license wouldn't make sense. Yearly subscriptions are usually cheaper. In addition to the standard licensing fee, there is just the cost of running the hardware where it is hosted."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

University

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?

I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...

See all answers

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 16% of the time

Coverity vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 11% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 10% of the time

Veracode vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 6% of the time

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Competitors

Microsoft Intune vs Venn Software

Compared 58% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Venn Software

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs Venn Software

Compared 16% of the time

More Venn Software Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

July 2025

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report

Download SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) product report

Buyer's Guide

Remote Access

August 2025

Download Venn Software product report

Also Known As

Sonar

No data available

Interactive Demo

Sonar

Demo not available

Venn Software

Overview

SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.

SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.

What are the key features of SonarQube Server?

Support for 20+ languages: Extensive programming language support suitable for diverse coding environments.
Custom coding rules: Allows for tailored rule sets to match specific coding standards.
Flexible quality gates: Define criteria for code acceptance at various intervals.
CI/CD integration: Seamless integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment tools.
Rich interface: User-friendly dashboard with detailed visual insights.

What benefits should users expect from SonarQube Server?

Improved code quality: Enhanced analysis contributes to fewer bugs and improved coding practices.
Security enhancements: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities pre-emptively.
Maintainability: Reduces technical debt, yielding long-term development efficiency.
Customizable: Flexibility in configuration aligns with specific project needs.

Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.

Sonar

Venn Software is a powerful platform lauded for its robust features, intuitive UI, and responsive customer support. Users appreciate its scalability, customization options, and seamless integration capabilities. However, a few reviews mention occasional performance issues and a steep learning curve, making it challenging for beginners. Based on user reviews, Venn Software provides a reliable solution for businesses seeking advanced functionality, but newcomers may require additional time and support to fully utilize its potential.

Venn Software

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Venn is currently being used by 700+ organizations. The newest version of our secure workspace is selling not only to our existing customer base but to new companies like Voya, ModSquad, TTech and many others.

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Venn Software

July 2025

Free Report: SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Venn Software

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Venn Software and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Venn Software report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.