SUSE NeuVector vs Snyk comparison

Snyk and SUSE are both solutions in the Container Security category. Snyk is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.7, while SUSE is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.0. Snyk holds a 5.3% mindshare in Container Security, compared to SUSE’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Snyk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SUSE users who would recommend it.

Snyk

Read 48 Snyk reviews

19,416 Views
5,825 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SUSE NeuVector

Read 8 SUSE NeuVector reviews

2,910 Views
2,735 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Snyk

SUSE NeuVector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 7, 2025

Snyk and SUSE NeuVector are both prominent in the realm of security solutions, especially focusing on vulnerability management for developers and container security, respectively. Snyk appears to have an edge with its developer-friendly approach and robust integration capabilities across varied environments.

Features: Snyk is lauded for its self-service platform, extensive database of vulnerabilities, and easy integrations with cloud CI systems and source control. These features make it particularly user-friendly for quick issue resolution. SUSE NeuVector is noted for its run-time security, image scanning capabilities, and network visibility, all crucial for comprehensive container security in enterprise environments.

Room for Improvement: Snyk could enhance its offering by incorporating SAST and DAST capabilities, as well as improving static analysis and expanding support for more programming languages. Also, better visibility into library usage and more granular notifications would be beneficial. SUSE NeuVector could benefit from broadening its monitoring of developmental and operational environments and further integrating with container security platforms and cloud services to augment its infrastructure capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Snyk offers flexibility with its deployment across private, public, hybrid cloud, and on-premises environments, supported by responsive technical support and helpful customer success management. SUSE NeuVector is recognized for its effective deployments in both public cloud and on-premises environments, with proactive technical support tailored to enterprise needs.

Pricing and ROI: Snyk’s pricing, though premium, corresponds with the value it offers in terms of enhanced productivity and reduced vulnerability management time, showing significant ROI. It is perceived as justifiable due to its comprehensive support and integration capabilities. SUSE NeuVector, being open-source, offers a cost-effective solution with a competitive pricing structure, though additional support costs may apply, providing substantial value, especially for enterprises focused on container security.

To learn more, read our detailed SUSE NeuVector vs. Snyk Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SUSE NeuVector vs. Snyk

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Snyk

Ranking in Container Security

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (8th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (8th), Cloud Management (15th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (2nd), Software Development Analytics (2nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (17th), DevSecOps (2nd), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (1st)

SUSE NeuVector

Ranking in Container Security

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of Snyk is 5.3%, down from 5.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SUSE NeuVector is 2.3%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Security Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Snyk	5.3%
SUSE NeuVector	2.3%
Other	92.4%

Container Security

Featured Reviews

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Affordable tool boosts code scanning efficiency but faces integration hurdles

The most important feature of Snyk is its cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions such as Check Point. It is easy to consolidate Snyk across multiple entities within a large organization. Additionally, our integration of Snyk into GitHub allows us to automatically scan codebases and identify issues, which has improved efficiency.

Read full review

Danie Joubert

Managing Director at ProQuanta

Good value for money; great for policy management

Our model of deployment for this solution is on-premises. For people looking into this solution and trying to use it for the first time, I'd say make your life easier by using the SUSE product as well on top of your community scale stack. That makes your integration points a lot easier and smoother. I would also say during your initial setup, make sure that your clusters are already in terms of the capabilities with the version required. I would rate this solution an eight, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best. The reason for this rating is that what they offer is solid, but they could expand their service and add more features just to make more things integrated into an enterprise itself.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Snyk has given us really good results because it is fully automated. We don't have to scan projects every time to find vulnerabilities, as it already stores the dependencies that we are using. It monitors 24/7 to find out if there are any issues that have been reported out on the Internet."

"The valuable aspect is its security capabilities."

"The most valuable features include enriched information around the vulnerabilities for better triaging, in terms of the vulnerability layer origin and vulnerability tree."

"The code scans on the source code itself were valuable."

"Snyk allows for scaling across large organizations, accommodating tens of thousands of applications and over 60,000 repositories, making it suitable for wide-scale deployment."

"The most valuable features are their GitLab and JIRA integrations. The GitLab integration lets us pull projects in pretty easily, so that it's pretty minimal for developers to get it set up. Using the JIRA integration, it's also pretty easy to get the information that is generated, as a result of that GitLab integration, back to our teams in a non-intrusive way and in a workflow that we are already using."

"It has a nice dashboard where I can see all the vulnerabilities and risks that they provided. I can also see the category of any risk, such as medium, high, and low. They provide the input priority-wise. The team can target the highest one first, and then they can go to medium and low ones."

"Snyk's focus on security is a valuable feature. Also Snyk supports multiple programming languages, which has positively affected my security practices. I use only two or three languages, and when I change the language in a file, it detects it in the same suite. I find the AI-powered scanning overall beneficial.Using Snyk's AI-powered scanning, I can detect around ten or twenty errors in my project with about twenty thousand lines of code, so it helps improve my project by identifying a lot of potential vulnerabilities."

More Snyk pros

"The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities."

"The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable."

"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost."

"When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly."

"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security."

"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."

"The solution includes many features, not only for container and client security but also for scanning nodes, networks, and vulnerabilities."

"The UI has a lot of features."

More SUSE NeuVector pros

Cons

"Snyk has several limitations, including issues with Gradle, NPM, and Xcode, and trouble with AutoPR."

"It would be great if they can include dynamic, interactive, and run-time scanning features. Checkmarx and Veracode provide dynamic, interactive, and run-time scanning, but Snyk doesn't do that. That's the reason there is more inclination towards Veracode, Checkmarx, or AppScan. These are a few tools available in the market that do all four types of scanning: static, dynamic, interactive, and run-time."

"We were using Microsoft Docker images. It was reporting some vulnerabilities, but we were not able to figure out the fix for them. It was reporting some vulnerabilities in the Docker images given by Microsoft, which were out of our control. That was the only limitation. Otherwise, it was good."

"We've also had technical issues with blocking newly introduced vulnerabilities in PRs and that was creating a lot of extra work for developers in trying to close and reopen the PR to get rid of some areas. We ended up having to disable that feature altogether because it wasn't really working for us and it was actually slowing down developer velocity."

"The solution's integration with JFrog Artifactory could be improved."

"Because Snyk has so many integrations and so many things it can do, it's hard to really understand all of them and to get that information to each team that needs it... If there were more self-service, perhaps tutorials or overviews for new teams or developers, so that they could click through and see things themselves, that would help."

"There are a lot of false positives that need to be identified and separated."

"The solution's reporting and storage could be improved."

More Snyk cons

"SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."

"However, I found that the support in Egypt was not very qualified, and there was a need to upgrade to a higher support layer to solve my issues."

"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline."

"Using a node port instead of a cluster IP is less ideal when implementing federation features between two clusters and could be improved."

"The image-scanning features need improvement."

"SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful."

"We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines."

"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment."

More SUSE NeuVector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We do have some missing licenses issues, especially with non-SPDX compliant one, but we expect this to be fixed soon"

"The price of the solution is expensive compared to other solutions."

"The pricing is acceptable, especially for enterprises. I don't think it's too much of a concern for our customers. Something like $99 per user is reasonable when the stakes are high."

"Their licensing model is fairly robust and scalable for our needs. I believe we have reached a reasonable agreement on the licensing to enable hundreds of developers to participate in this product offering. The solution is very tailored towards developers and its licensing model works well for us."

"With Snyk, you get what you pay for. It is not a cheap solution, but you get a comprehensiveness and level of coverage that is very good. The dollars in the security budget only go so far. If I can maximize my value and be able to have some funds left over for other initiatives, I want to do that. That is what drives me to continue to say, "What's out there in the market? Snyk's expensive, but it's good. Is there something as good, but more affordable?" Ultimately, I find we could go cheaper, but we would lose the completeness of vision or scope. I am not willing to do that because Snyk does provide a pretty important benefit for us."

"It's inexpensive and easy to license. It comes in standard package sizing, which is straightforward. This information is publicly found on their website."

"I didn't think the price was that great, but it wasn't that bad, either. I'd rate their pricing as average in the market."

"It's good value. That's the primary thing. It's not cheap-cheap, but it's good value."

More Snyk pricing and cost advice

"SUSE NeuVector is an open-source solution."

"The solution's pricing could be better. The cost of a subscription is calculated on the basis of work."

"Licensing fees are paid yearly."

"The price of SUSE NeuVector is low. There is an additional cost for support."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	21

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?

Snyk does a great job identifying and reducing vulnerabilities. This solution is fully automated and monitors 24/7 to find any issues reported on the internet. It will store dependencies that you a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Snyk?

The most effective feature in securing project dependencies stems from its ability to highlight security vulnerabilities.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Snyk?

There are a lot of false positives that need to be identified and separated. The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial. So far, I've not seen any AI features to enhance vuln...

See all answers

What do you like most about NeuVector?

The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NeuVector?

SUSE NeuVector is an open-source solution. You have to pay for the support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NeuVector?

One area for improvement is NeuVector's ability to import CVEs from different sources. Additionally, using a node port instead of a cluster IP is less ideal when implementing federation features be...

See all answers

Comparisons

GitHub Advanced Security vs Snyk

Compared 10% of the time

Trivy vs Snyk

Compared 9% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Snyk

Compared 8% of the time

Wiz vs Snyk

Compared 6% of the time

Black Duck vs Snyk

Compared 5% of the time

More Snyk Competitors

Trivy vs SUSE NeuVector

Compared 17% of the time

Sysdig Falco vs SUSE NeuVector

Compared 12% of the time

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes vs SUSE NeuVector

Compared 10% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs SUSE NeuVector

Compared 7% of the time

Sysdig Secure vs SUSE NeuVector

Compared 7% of the time

More SUSE NeuVector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Snyk

August 2025

Download Snyk product report

Buyer's Guide

Container Security

August 2025

Download SUSE NeuVector product report

Also Known As

Fugue

NeuVector

Overview

Snyk's AI Trust Platform empowers developers to innovate securely in AI-driven environments, ensuring rapid and secure software development with enhanced policy governance.

Snyk’s platform integrates AI-ready engines across the software development lifecycle, offering broad coverage with high speed and accuracy essential for fast-paced coding environments. AI-driven features include visibility, prioritization, and tailored security policies that enable proactive threat prevention and quick remediation. By focusing on LLM engineering and AI code analysis, Snyk supports secure and productive development processes. The platform's partnerships, including GenAI code assistants, enhance AI application security by addressing new threats and code velocity challenges.

What are the key features of Snyk?

Easy Integration: Snyk integrates with CI/CD pipelines, GitHub, and JIRA for seamless security management.
Multilingual Support: It offers extensive programming language support, enhancing project compatibility.
Actionable Insights: Provides accurate vulnerability detection with actionable remediation guidance.
Cloud and Container Security: Offers comprehensive checks for cloud and container environments, improving security posture.
Automation & Notifications: Automates vulnerability alerts and notifications for early threat identification in development.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Time Efficiency: Speeds up development by identifying and fixing vulnerabilities early in the software lifecycle.
Risk Reduction: Minimizes security risks with extensive vulnerability scanning and proactive alerting.
Productivity Boost: Enhances productivity by integrating security directly into developers' workflows.
Improved Compliance: Aids in maintaining license compliance and managing open-source dependencies effectively.

Snyk is implemented across industries focusing on agile development and DevSecOps, enhancing software delivery speed and security. It is widely used for continuous monitoring and adherence to security and licensing standards, especially in environments relying on Docker image security and CI/CD pipeline integration.

Snyk

SUSE NeuVector is a full lifecycle container security solution that helps your organization secure its container infrastructures, manage Kubernetes security risks, and block threats. The NeuVector continuous container security and compliance platform simplifies data protection from pipeline to production, enforces compliance, and provides complete visibility and automated controls for protection against known and unknown threats. In addition, NeuVector is the only Kubernetes-native container security solution that offers a comprehensive risk profile of known vulnerabilities and also delivers immediate protection from all vulnerabilities.

SUSE NeuVector Features

SUSE NueVector has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Container incident detection and prevention
Network security
Runtime security
Supply chain security
Container firewall
Host and platform security
Cloud-native automation and integration
Resource monitoring
Visualization and reporting
High availability
Security
Vulnerability management
Compliance and auditing
Alerting
Logging and Response

SUSE NeuVector Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing NeuVector. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Deep packet inspection (DPI): NeuVector applies DPI to identify attacks, detect sensitive data, or verify application access to further reduce the attack surface. Only network layer analysis enables security to detect and verify the allowed protocols, helping security teams enforce business policy.

Real-time protection: NeuVector provides inspection, segmentation, and protection of all traffic into and out of a container. This includes container to container traffic, and ingress from external sources to containers, as well as egress from containers to external applications and the internet. The solution aims to protect your applications from internal application level attacks such as DDoS and DNS.

Capture packets for debugging and threat investigation: WIth NeuVector, you can view summary connection data and drill down into actual packet details for each container, as they scale up and down. When a threat is detected, NeuVector is able to automatically capture and display the packet info, making it easy for you to investigate.

Automated security policies: The NeuVector solution allows you to automate the creation of security policies to protect application workloads in production. The solution also enables you to automate and maintain run-time security policies using Kubernetes custom resource definitions (CRDs), and gives you the option to declare an application security policy at any stage in the pipeline.

Compliance: NeuVector offers detection capabilities and security policy enforcement that prevent PHI and PII exposure, exceed requirements, and simplify reporting for PCI-DSS, GDPR, HIPAA, and more. The solution helps you track critical vulnerabilities and compliance violations so you can quickly identify any that require immediate patching or followup alerts. It also makes it possible for you to manage vulnerability and compliance scan results, with no required integration to external workflow tools.

Reviews from Real Users

A Platform Solution Architect at a tech services company says, “The solution is feature-rich, easy to set up, and has good support.”

SUSE

Sample Customers

StartApp, Segment, Skyscanner, DigitalOcean, Comic Relief

Figo, Clear Review, Arvato Bertelsmann, Experian, Chime

Buyer's Guide

SUSE NeuVector vs. Snyk

July 2025

Free Report: SUSE NeuVector vs. Snyk

Find out what your peers are saying about SUSE NeuVector vs. Snyk and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SUSE NeuVector vs. Snyk report.

See our list of best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.