Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SUSE NeuVector vs Snyk comparison

Snyk and SUSE are both solutions in the Container Security category. Snyk is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0, while SUSE is ranked #15 with an average rating of 9.0. Snyk holds a 5.4% mindshare in Container Security, compared to SUSE’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Snyk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SUSE users who would recommend it.
Snyk
Read 49 Snyk reviews
  • 19,965 Views
  • 5,590 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
SUSE NeuVector
Read 8 SUSE NeuVector reviews
  • 2,737 Views
  • 2,573 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2025

Snyk and SUSE NeuVector are contenders in the cybersecurity space, focusing on container and software security solutions. Snyk takes the lead due to its developer-centric approach, extensive integrations, and impressive vulnerability management.

Features: Snyk excels in ease of use and integration with platforms like Slack, providing a self-service model that is developer-friendly. Its accurate vulnerability database and container security allow developers to identify and address vulnerabilities in real-time. Conversely, SUSE NeuVector offers robust run-time security and extensive network scanning, enhancing container and client security with effective node and network vulnerability scanning.

Room for Improvement: Snyk can benefit from adding SAST and DAST capabilities, optimizing runtime analysis, and supporting additional programming languages. Its notification system's precision also needs enhancement. SUSE NeuVector should broaden its infrastructure scanning and improve its image-scanning features, potentially enhancing its security suite offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Snyk demonstrates deployment flexibility across private to hybrid clouds, albeit with potential complexity in certain IDE integrations. Its customer service is generally positive, supported by clear documentation and proactive teams, though some experiences vary. SUSE NeuVector provides dependable technical support with quick, knowledgeable responses, yet could improve tool integration ease.

Pricing and ROI: While Snyk's pricing may appear high, it offers substantial value with detailed insights, boosting developer productivity and ROI. Its pricing based on committers might surprise non-coding users with unexpected charges. SUSE NeuVector provides cost-effective solutions, particularly through its open-source form, with additional support costs. Both solutions offer features that reduce problem resolution costs and enhance security efficiency.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed SUSE NeuVector vs. Snyk Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
SUSE NeuVector vs. Snyk
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 872,655 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Snyk
Ranking in Container Security
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
49
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (18th), Application Security Tools (6th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (8th), GRC (5th), Cloud Management (14th), Vulnerability Management (14th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (1st), Software Development Analytics (2nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (15th), DevSecOps (2nd), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (2nd)
SUSE NeuVector
Ranking in Container Security
15th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of Snyk is 5.4%, down from 5.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SUSE NeuVector is 2.2%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Security Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Snyk5.4%
SUSE NeuVector2.2%
Other92.4%
Container Security
 

Featured Reviews

meetharoon - PeerSpot reviewer
Affordable tool boosts code scanning efficiency but faces integration hurdles
I lead a code security practice for our organization. We integrated Snyk into our GitHub, using CLI to automatically scan codebases and identify issues. We are a large organization with three independent entities, consolidating Snyk across all entities.  We also provide access through numerous…
Read full review
Danie Joubert - PeerSpot reviewer
Good value for money; great for policy management
Our model of deployment for this solution is on-premises. For people looking into this solution and trying to use it for the first time, I'd say make your life easier by using the SUSE product as well on top of your community scale stack. That makes your integration points a lot easier and smoother. I would also say during your initial setup, make sure that your clusters are already in terms of the capabilities with the version required. I would rate this solution an eight, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best. The reason for this rating is that what they offer is solid, but they could expand their service and add more features just to make more things integrated into an enterprise itself.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution's Open Source feature gives us notifications and suggestions regarding how to address vulnerabilities."
"We're loving some of the Kubernetes integration as well. That's really quite cool. It's still in the early days of our use of it, but it looks really exciting. In the Kubernetes world, it's very good at reporting on the areas around the configuration of your platform, rather than the things that you've pulled in. There's some good advice there that allows you to prioritize whether something is important or just worrying. That's very helpful."
"We use Snyk to check vulnerabilities and rectify potential leaks in GitHub."
"The dependency checks of the libraries are very valuable, but the licensing part is also very important because, with open source components, licensing can be all over the place. Our project is not an open source project, but we do use quite a lot of open source components and we want to make sure that we don't have surprises in there."
"I find SCA to be valuable. It can read your libraries, your license and bring the best way to resolve your problem in the best scenario."
"From a compliance and visibility reporting perspective, the fact that it can be applicable for multi-cloud environments is very helpful."
"The most valuable features of Snyk are vulnerability scanning and automation. The automation the solution brings around vulnerability scanning is useful."
"From the software composition analysis perspective, it first makes sure that we understand what is happening from a third-party perspective for the particular product that we use. This is very difficult when you are building software and incorporating dependencies from other libraries, because those dependencies have dependencies and that chain of dependencies can go pretty deep. There could be a vulnerability in something that is seven layers deep, and it would be very difficult to understand that is even affecting us. Therefore, Snyk provides fantastic visibility to know, "Yes, we have a problem. Here is where it ultimately comes from." It may not be with what we're incorporating, but something much deeper than that."
More Snyk pros
"When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly."
"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."
"The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable."
"The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities."
"The UI has a lot of features."
"The solution includes many features, not only for container and client security but also for scanning nodes, networks, and vulnerabilities."
"The solution includes many features, not only for container and client security but also for scanning nodes, networks, and vulnerabilities."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security."
More SUSE NeuVector pros
 

Cons

"We tried to integrate it into our software development environment but it went really badly. It took a lot of time and prevented the developers from using the IDE. Eventually, we didn't use it in the development area... I would like to see better integrations to help the developers get along better with the tool. And the plugin for the IDE is not so good. This is something we would like to have..."
"The solution could improve the reports. They have been working on improving the reports but more work could be done."
"I would like to give further ability to grouping code repositories, in such a way that you could group them by the teams that own them, then produce alerting to those teams. The way that we are seeing it right now, the alerting only goes to a couple of places. I wish we could configure the code to go to different places."
"We have to integrate with their database, which means we need to send our entire code to them to scan, and they send us the report. A company working in the financial domain usually won't like to share its code or any information outside its network with any third-party provider."
"The general input I have is that there is an opportunity for them to better align with other similar tools and better align with similar capabilities that cloud suppliers deliver natively."
"The solution's integration with JFrog Artifactory could be improved."
"I use Snyk alongside Sonar, and Snyk tends to generate a lot of false positives. Improving the overall report quality and reducing false positives would be beneficial. I don't need additional features; just improving the existing ones would be enough."
"I think Snyk should add more of a vulnerability protection feature in the tool since it is an area where it lacks."
More Snyk cons
"However, I found that the support in Egypt was not very qualified, and there was a need to upgrade to a higher support layer to solve my issues."
"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline."
"Using a node port instead of a cluster IP is less ideal when implementing federation features between two clusters and could be improved."
"SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful."
"The image-scanning features need improvement."
"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment."
"SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."
"The documentation needs to improve a bit."
More SUSE NeuVector cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For what Snyk offers, it has the best cost-benefit I have ever seen because you're buying the license per user."
"Presently, my company uses an open-source version of the solution. The solution's pricing can be considered quite reasonable owing to the features they offer."
"The product has good pricing."
"Cost-wise, it's similar to Veracode, but I don't know the exact cost."
"The price of the solution is expensive compared to other solutions."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"You can get a good deal with Snyk for pricing. It's a little expensive, but it is worth it."
"Snyk is a premium-priced product, so it's kind of expensive. The big con that I find frustrating is when a company charges extra for single sign-on (SSO) into their SaaS app. Snyk is one of the few that I'm willing to pay that add-on charge, but generally I disqualify products that charge an extra fee to do integrated authentication to our identity provider, like Okta or some other SSO. That is a big negative. We had to pay extra for that. That little annoyance aside, it is expensive. You get a lot out of it, but you're paying for that premium."
More Snyk pricing and cost advice
"Licensing fees are paid yearly."
"The price of SUSE NeuVector is low. There is an additional cost for support."
"SUSE NeuVector is an open-source solution."
"The solution's pricing could be better. The cost of a subscription is calculated on the basis of work."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
872,655 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
7%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise21
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?
Snyk does a great job identifying and reducing vulnerabilities. This solution is fully automated and monitors 24/7 to find any issues reported on the internet. It will store dependencies that you a...
See all answers
What do you like most about Snyk?
The most effective feature in securing project dependencies stems from its ability to highlight security vulnerabilities.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Snyk?
There are a lot of false positives that need to be identified and separated. The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial. So far, I've not seen any AI features to enhance vuln...
See all answers
What do you like most about NeuVector?
The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NeuVector?
SUSE NeuVector is an open-source solution. You have to pay for the support.
See all answers
What needs improvement with NeuVector?
One area for improvement is NeuVector's ability to import CVEs from different sources. Additionally, using a node port instead of a cluster IP is less ideal when implementing federation features be...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Snyk Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Snyk
Compared 8% of the time
GitHub Advanced Security vs Snyk Logo
GitHub Advanced Security vs Snyk
Compared 8% of the time
Trivy vs Snyk Logo
Trivy vs Snyk
Compared 8% of the time
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs Snyk Logo
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs Snyk
Compared 7% of the time
Wiz vs Snyk Logo
Wiz vs Snyk
Compared 5% of the time
More Snyk Competitors
Trivy vs SUSE NeuVector Logo
Trivy vs SUSE NeuVector
Compared 18% of the time
Sysdig Falco vs SUSE NeuVector Logo
Sysdig Falco vs SUSE NeuVector
Compared 12% of the time
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes vs SUSE NeuVector Logo
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes vs SUSE NeuVector
Compared 9% of the time
Sysdig Secure vs SUSE NeuVector Logo
Sysdig Secure vs SUSE NeuVector
Compared 7% of the time
Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs SUSE NeuVector Logo
Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs SUSE NeuVector
Compared 7% of the time
More SUSE NeuVector Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Snyk
October 2025
Snyk reportDownload Snyk product report
Buyer's Guide
Container Security
October 2025
SUSE NeuVector reportDownload SUSE NeuVector product report
 

Also Known As

Fugue, Snyk AppRisk
NeuVector
 

Overview

Snyk excels in integrating security within the development lifecycle, providing teams with an AI Trust Platform that combines speed with security efficiency, ensuring robust AI application development.

Snyk empowers developers with AI-ready engines offering broad coverage, accuracy, and speed essential for modern development. With AI-powered visibility and security, Snyk allows proactive threat prevention and swift threat remediation. The platform supports shifts toward LLM engineering and AI code analysis, enhancing security and development productivity. Snyk collaborates with GenAI coding assistants for improved productivity and AI application threat management. Platform extensibility supports evolving standards with API access and native integrations, ensuring comprehensive and seamless security embedding in development tools.

What are Snyk's standout features?
  • Simplicity and Integration: Easy to integrate across platforms like GitLab, GitHub, and Jira.
  • Comprehensive Vulnerability Database: Offers accurate reporting for effective vulnerability management.
  • Developer-Friendly Design: Supports multiple programming languages, appealing to developers.
  • Automation and Flexibility: Enhances workflow efficiency with automated capabilities.
What benefits can users expect?
  • Efficiency in Vulnerability Detection: Streamlines prioritization and remediation processes.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Offers a competitive pricing model compared to alternatives.
  • Enhanced Workflow: Integration with DevOps tools improves development processes.

Industries leverage Snyk for security in CI/CD pipelines by automating checks for dependency vulnerabilities and managing open-source licenses. Its Docker and Kubernetes scanning capabilities enhance container security, supporting a proactive security approach. Integrations with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps optimize implementation across diverse software environments.

Snyk

SUSE NeuVector is a full lifecycle container security solution that helps your organization secure its container infrastructures, manage Kubernetes security risks, and block threats. The NeuVector continuous container security and compliance platform simplifies data protection from pipeline to production, enforces compliance, and provides complete visibility and automated controls for protection against known and unknown threats. In addition, NeuVector is the only Kubernetes-native container security solution that offers a comprehensive risk profile of known vulnerabilities and also delivers immediate protection from all vulnerabilities.

SUSE NeuVector Features

SUSE NueVector has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

  • Container incident detection and prevention
  • Network security
  • Runtime security
  • Supply chain security
  • Container firewall
  • Host and platform security
  • Cloud-native automation and integration
  • Resource monitoring
  • Visualization and reporting
  • High availability
  • Security
  • Vulnerability management
  • Compliance and auditing
  • Alerting
  • Logging and Response

SUSE NeuVector Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing NeuVector. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

  • Deep packet inspection (DPI): NeuVector applies DPI to identify attacks, detect sensitive data, or verify application access to further reduce the attack surface. Only network layer analysis enables security to detect and verify the allowed protocols, helping security teams enforce business policy.
  • Real-time protection: NeuVector provides inspection, segmentation, and protection of all traffic into and out of a container. This includes container to container traffic, and ingress from external sources to containers, as well as egress from containers to external applications and the internet. The solution aims to protect your applications from internal application level attacks such as DDoS and DNS.
  • Capture packets for debugging and threat investigation: WIth NeuVector, you can view summary connection data and drill down into actual packet details for each container, as they scale up and down. When a threat is detected, NeuVector is able to automatically capture and display the packet info, making it easy for you to investigate.
  • Automated security policies: The NeuVector solution allows you to automate the creation of security policies to protect application workloads in production. The solution also enables you to automate and maintain run-time security policies using Kubernetes custom resource definitions (CRDs), and gives you the option to declare an application security policy at any stage in the pipeline.
  • Compliance: NeuVector offers detection capabilities and security policy enforcement that prevent PHI and PII exposure, exceed requirements, and simplify reporting for PCI-DSS, GDPR, HIPAA, and more. The solution helps you track critical vulnerabilities and compliance violations so you can quickly identify any that require immediate patching or followup alerts. It also makes it possible for you to manage vulnerability and compliance scan results, with no required integration to external workflow tools.

Reviews from Real Users

A Platform Solution Architect at a tech services company says, “The solution is feature-rich, easy to set up, and has good support.”

SUSE
 

Sample Customers

StartApp, Segment, Skyscanner, DigitalOcean, Comic Relief
Figo, Clear Review, Arvato Bertelsmann, Experian, Chime
Buyer's Guide
SUSE NeuVector vs. Snyk
September 2025
Free Report: SUSE NeuVector vs. Snyk
Find out what your peers are saying about SUSE NeuVector vs. Snyk and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
872,655 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our SUSE NeuVector vs. Snyk report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.