Skyhawk Security vs Symantec Cloud Workload Protection comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Skyhawk Security Logo
193 views|95 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Broadcom Logo
158 views|101 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Skyhawk Security and Symantec Cloud Workload Protection based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP).
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,765 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It helps us in reaching the ISO27001 certification.""The initial setup process is easy and intuitive."

More Skyhawk Security Pros →

"The most valuable features in Symantec Cloud Workload Protection are endpoint protection and active directory features. The active directory features in the product are very good, and in terms of security, the most valuable feature in Symantec Cloud Workload Protection is threat defense or threat protection.""It will read various logs, diagnose what is wrong, and then alert you."

More Symantec Cloud Workload Protection Pros →

Cons
"The platform’s interface needs enhancement.""The solution needs automatic testing."

More Skyhawk Security Cons →

"One area for improvement in Symantec Cloud Workload Protection is integration. Other features that could be improved are defense control and encryption, particularly in the USB. For example, users should be able to control the USB and have the capability of blocking and allowing USB reading and writing. Having a USB encryption feature in Symantec Cloud Workload Protection would also be very useful.""In the future, we may need to use features that are only available in one of the competing products."

More Symantec Cloud Workload Protection Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The licensing cost for Symantec Cloud Workload Protection is paid yearly."
  • More Symantec Cloud Workload Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) solutions are best for your needs.
    770,765 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable features in Symantec Cloud Workload Protection are endpoint protection and active directory features. The active directory features in the product are very good, and in terms of… more »
    Top Answer:One area for improvement in Symantec Cloud Workload Protection is integration. Other features that could be improved are defense control and encryption, particularly in the USB. For example, users… more »
    Top Answer:In our company, we installed Symantec Cloud Workload Protection for building protection and security on hybrid cloud, but it's just on a test environment, and not on a production environment. We use… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    193
    Comparisons
    95
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    435
    Rating
    10.0
    Views
    158
    Comparisons
    101
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    674
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Radware Cloud Native Protector
    Learn More
    Skyhawk Security
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Migrating workloads to the public cloud creates new threat surfaces which can be exploited by attackers and lead to theft of your customers' data.

    Skyhawk Security provides comprehensive protection for applications hosted on public clouds with multi-layer defenses which secure the cloud environment against identity and access abuse, protect against malicious user behavior, and secure the overall security posture of the public cloud environment.

    Symantec Cloud Workload Protection automates security for public cloud workloads, enabling business agility, risk reduction, and cost savings for organizations, while easing DevOps and administrative burdens. Rapid discovery, visibility, and elastic protection of AWS and Azure workloads enable automated security policy enforcement to protect applications from unknown exploits.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    LifeLock
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Real Estate/Law Firm9%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise48%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP). Updated: April 2024.
    770,765 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Skyhawk Security is ranked 17th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 2 reviews while Symantec Cloud Workload Protection is ranked 23rd in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 2 reviews. Skyhawk Security is rated 10.0, while Symantec Cloud Workload Protection is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Skyhawk Security writes "Reasonably priced with quick notifications and a fast setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Cloud Workload Protection writes "Protects cloud-based workloads with antivirus and traffic analysis". Skyhawk Security is most compared with , whereas Symantec Cloud Workload Protection is most compared with AWS GuardDuty.

    See our list of best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.