SAS Access vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SAS Logo
372 views|307 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
WSO2 Logo
1,115 views|798 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SAS Access and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Integration Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable part of SAS/ACCESS is what it is made for: connecting to remote systems that are not part of your physical SAS environment.""The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ease of access to the data in those databases.""The most valuable feature is you have native access to the external databases."

More SAS Access Pros →

"The learning curve for this solution is very good.""It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well.""The solution has two main parts: integration and transformation. It's very user-friendly and easy to understand for everyone.""I like the user-friendly system and development of the service-oriented architecture.""The solution's technical support is very knowledgeable.""In my opinion, the most valuable aspect of this solution is its extensive range of adaptors and connectors. This feature holds significant importance and provides great value to users.""The installation process is easy.""The productivity is the most valuable feature. It is very easy to write remediations."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Pros →

Cons
"The pricing model needs to be reconsidered and adjusted.""I can't really recall any missing feature or general improvement that is needed. We don't really add too many new kinds of databases and therefore our needs are already met.""The solution can provide access to the newer databases that come out sooner."

More SAS Access Cons →

"They should release upgrades more frequently.""The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution.""You cannot include the validation of XPath.""The micro integrator should be improved. There is room for enhancement considering alternative integration components.""The customization can be a bit difficult.""In my opinion, the administration model and interface, of Carbon, are lacking in terms of its features and user experience.""There are a lot of security settings that when you apply you have to re-apply again every time you modify a setting. It is something that really needs to be enhanced.""They should introduce better pricing for small companies."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing model is complex and is based on modular packages as well as the size of the applicable environment."
  • "The solution's pricing and licensing are expensive."
  • More SAS Access Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."
  • "The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."
  • "The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."
  • "It is a low-cost solution."
  • "The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."
  • "I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
  • More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is you have native access to the external databases.
    Top Answer:The solution's pricing and licensing are expensive. It is not the cheapest software. However, SAS systems are solutions that customers use over decades of time and you can rely on the solution being… more »
    Top Answer:The solution can provide access to the newer databases that come out sooner.
    Top Answer:WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide.
    Top Answer:The product has reasonable and competitive pricing for enterprise customers. It is expensive for small businesses especially. They are using the open-source solution, and they find it expensive since… more »
    Top Answer:The micro integrator should be improved. There is room for enhancement considering alternative integration components. Some workloads may benefit from optimization or additional features… more »
    Ranking
    42nd
    out of 100 in Data Integration
    Views
    372
    Comparisons
    307
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    316
    Rating
    8.0
    19th
    out of 100 in Data Integration
    Views
    1,115
    Comparisons
    798
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    545
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SAS/Access
    Learn More
    Overview
    SAS/ACCESS is an out-of-the-box solution for integrating SAS and third-party databases. You can read, write and update data regardless of the database or platform. Because the data appears native to SAS, there is no need to learn Structured Query Language (SQL) or any other database-specific query languages.

    WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, core to the WSO2 Integration Agile Platform, is an open source Integration product for cloud native and container-native projects. It enables enterprise integration experts to build, scale, and secure sophisticated integration solutions to achieve digital agility. Unlike other integration products, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator already contains integration runtimes, message brokering, business process modeling, analytics and visual tooling capabilities.

    Sample Customers
    Los Angeles County, West Midlands Police, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Canada Post, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty
    West
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Insurance Company10%
    Government8%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Manufacturing Company20%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Government6%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise5%
    Large Enterprise72%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business47%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Integration
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration. Updated: April 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SAS Access is ranked 42nd in Data Integration with 3 reviews while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is ranked 19th in Data Integration with 18 reviews. SAS Access is rated 9.0, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of SAS Access writes "The solution is stable, scalable, and flexible". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator writes "Consolidated, reliable, and has responsive technical support". SAS Access is most compared with Delphix, SSIS, Zapier and Toad Data Point, whereas WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is most compared with Red Hat Fuse, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, webMethods Integration Server and Mule ESB.

    See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.