Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SaaS Security by Palo Alto vs Veza comparison

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SaaS Security by Palo Alto
Ranking in SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM)
10th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Veza
Ranking in SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM)
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
GRC (20th), Identity Management (IM) (23rd), Authorization Software (6th), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (24th), Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) (6th), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (12th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) category, the mindshare of SaaS Security by Palo Alto is 3.5%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veza is 4.8%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM)
 

Featured Reviews

Saloni Rao - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable solution that offers WildFire analysis, but it is expensive than other products
The most valuable features of the solution are the lesser points of management and the WildFire analysis it offers SaaS Security by Palo Alto is more expensive than other products and could be a bit cheaper. I have been using SaaS Security by Palo Alto for the last six months. SaaS Security by…
Brooke Lynne Bowman - PeerSpot reviewer
Streamlined compliance process with custom control framework and AI-driven security questionnaire management
Vanta has made the security questionnaire process much easier, thanks to AI. It automatically extracts answers and populates them within the SIG. The custom control framework allows me to incorporate our HITRUST controls and additional ISO twenty-seven thousand and one and financial controls. Moreover, it includes a knowledge bank for questionnaires and RFPs, making information updates more streamlined.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features of the solution are the lesser points of management and the WildFire analysis it offers."
"It's the only current GRC vendor with licensing rights for HITRUST 11.3 framework, and I've avoided expensive HITRUST licensing costs through a custom control framework."
 

Cons

"SaaS Security by Palo Alto is more expensive than other products and could be a bit cheaper."
"The support experience could be better."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) solutions are best for your needs.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SaaS Security by Palo Alto?
The most valuable features of the solution are the lesser points of management and the WildFire analysis it offers.
What needs improvement with SaaS Security by Palo Alto?
SaaS Security by Palo Alto is more expensive than other products and could be a bit cheaper.
What advice do you have for others considering SaaS Security by Palo Alto?
In the last four months, we deployed the solution in a large bike manufacturing company and a telecom company. The solution's technology is more sophisticated, and it has better alerts and threat d...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veza?
The overall price point of Vanta is commendable, especially considering the custom control framework that allows me to evade the high costs associated with HITRUST licensing.
What needs improvement with Veza?
The support experience could be better. We often need to escalate our issues to the account executive to receive a response, especially when support is needed for integrations.
What is your primary use case for Veza?
We are currently in the implementation stages of Vanta. It's been challenging to build out as it is not as intuitive as OneTrust, especially in terms of scoping and needs.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview