We performed a comparison between Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) and VMware vSphere based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Canonical, Oracle and others in Operating Systems (OS) for Business."We find the Red Hat Satellite deployments very useful. It integrates well with other solutions."
"Logical volumes allow us to dynamically expand volumes, which is valuable from an operational perspective."
"There are some nice integrations with scanning for vulnerabilities. That is the feature I have enjoyed the most because I am a security person, and that is my bread and butter."
"We also use Ansible. Ansible is a wonderful tool for automation. We use it to automate our patching. We use Ansible to get playbooks to take care of anything that's manual."
"LVM is a valuable feature."
"The security of the OS is the most valuable feature."
"The frequent updates are valuable."
"The most valuable features of Red Hat Enterprise Linux are the mobile applications and getting real-time notifications."
"Very reliable with a great community."
"The provisioning setup of VMs is good."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance."
"There is the simplicity of management, accessibility, and availability."
"It's easy to use and very user-friendly."
"Virtualised automation is a useful feature."
"The fact that vSphere is an on-premise solution is beneficial for the user. It's easier to manage the infrastructure. It's more straightforward to scale and configure virtual machines."
"The most valuable features are the seamless HA with vMotion and being able to run vCenters in HA mode."
"One challenge we've faced is with databases. Configuring and implementing DBs is much easier in non-Red Hat Enterprise Linux systems, especially in Microsoft."
"The DNF package manager could be improved."
"The licensing model is kind of a mess."
"It is challenging to use the knowledge base and the deployment documentation."
"Red Hat should provide a way to mirror repositories or at least provide a solution for us to bubble up packages throughout the entire process."
"Although the price is reasonable, there is room for improvement in order to stand out from other open-source solutions."
"Some of the repositories and some of the DNS versions are very old. I just deployed something using Ruby and the DNS stable repository was sufficiently old that the Ruby project I was using didn't work."
"I don't like the UI changes that come with different versions."
"VMware vSphere does not permit hard partitioning."
"They can lower the price of its license."
"The Web Client is too slow."
"We stopped using a lot of cloud services. However, I see that VMware has integrated with Amazon Cloud. We will now to have to move everything to the cloud."
"The integration with containers should be addressed."
"Not having to buy something from a third-party to scan the actual hardware components, like the hard drives and the port containers and fan speeds; not having to bolt something on and go through another vendor, would be helpful."
"They need to stop pushing code out so fast."
"When I use VMware and Citrix there are conflicts."
More Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is ranked 1st in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 167 reviews while VMware vSphere is ranked 2nd in Server Virtualization Software with 446 reviews. Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is rated 8.8, while VMware vSphere is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) writes "Highly stable, good knowledge base, and reasonable price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware vSphere writes "Offers good performance and is useful for banking systems". Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is most compared with Ubuntu Linux, Windows Server, SUSE Linux Enterprise and Windows 10, whereas VMware vSphere is most compared with Hyper-V, Proxmox VE, VMware Workstation, Oracle VM and KVM.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.