Qlik Compose vs SharePlex comparison

Qlik and Quest Software are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik is ranked #48, while Quest Software is ranked #49. Qlik holds a 1.0% mindshare in DI, compared to Quest Software’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

1,724 Views
1,500 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

SharePlex

Read 5 SharePlex reviews

1,991 Views
1,374 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

SharePlex

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

SharePlex and Qlik Compose compete in data integration and management. Qlik Compose has the upper hand due to its enhanced features.

Features: SharePlex offers high-performance replication and handles large data volumes efficiently, suitable for real-time integration across heterogeneous environments. Qlik Compose provides advanced transformation capabilities and strong integration with existing data ecosystems, making it ideal for complex data warehouse automation. SharePlex is known for stability and easy-to-use replication features, while Qlik Compose delivers robust automation and transformation flexibility.

Room for Improvement: SharePlex could improve by enhancing advanced transformation capabilities, increasing integration features with existing ecosystems, and providing more comprehensive automation. Qlik Compose can benefit from simplifying its deployment process, enhancing customer education resources, and offering a more intuitive interface for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SharePlex facilitates quick setup with a straightforward deployment model and reliable customer service. Qlik Compose, with its expansive features, has a more intricate deployment process but compensates with comprehensive support options.

Pricing and ROI: SharePlex has lower setup costs, delivering a solid ROI through efficient replication and reduced downtime. Qlik Compose requires a higher initial investment but offers long-term ROI through optimized processing and deeper insights, justifying the expense.

To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Compose vs. SharePlex Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. SharePlex

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

48th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SharePlex

Ranking in Data Integration

49th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Compose is 1.0%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SharePlex is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qlik Compose	1.0%
SharePlex	0.9%
Other	98.1%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Sahil Taneja

Principal Consultant/Manager at Tenzing

Easy matching and reconciliation of data

The initial setup was easy for the data warehousing concept. But for a person who is new to ETL and warehousing concepts, it may take some time. If someone is familiar with these concepts, they could understand and learn the tool quickly. However, compared to other tools, the UI is complex. It would be helpful to have a better UI and documentation for new users. As of now, there is a challenge in learning the Compose tool for new users altogether. Qlik Compose was deployed on-premises. But the servers, like the SQL servers were maintained on the cloud—the managed instances.

Read full review

Kristopher Wells

Oracle DBA at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

It reduces the downtime and migration time exponentially

I would rate SharePlex's high availability, and disaster recovery features highly. It works as advertised in terms of rapid fill-over and switch-over opportunities. It reduces the migration time for a multi-terabyte database to an hour or less because it performs real-time replication. SharePlex reduces downtime and migration time exponentially. Something that could take 12 to 24 hours is cut down to one to two hours. By the time you start to migrate, the only remaining replication is a slight difference in data from the point when SharePlex has shut down, and the application has to also switch over to the new database. It allowed the company to replicate data more transparently. Some of the business executives probably don't even know it's there. It works 100 percent of the time, with little downtime or problems. It provides what is needed. There's little concern about whether or not it functions. It's allowed the company to achieve its objectives with its clients, reducing and minimizing downtime for substantial migrations and upgrades. It can reduce hardware and storage costs, but my company doesn't utilize it with high-availability architecture.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."

"One of the most valuable features of this tool is its automation capabilities, allowing us to design the warehouse in an automated manner. Additionally, we can generate Data Lifecycle Policies (DLP) reports and efficiently implement updates and best practices based on proven design patterns."

"One of the most valuable features was the ability to integrate multiple source systems that mainly used structured IDBMS versions."

"The technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"I like modeling and code generation. It has become a pretty handy tool because of its short ideation to delivery time. From the time you decide you are modeling a data warehouse, and once you finish the modeling, it generates all the code, generates all the tables. All you have to do is tick a few things, and you can produce a fully functional warehouse. I also like that they have added all the features I have asked for over four years."

"I have found it to be a very good, stable, and strong product."

"There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms."

"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem."

More Qlik Compose pros

"The core features of the solution we like are the reliability of the data transfer and the accuracy of data read and write. The stability of the solution is also excellent."

"There are some capabilities within SharePlex where you can see how the data is migrating and if it still maintains good data integrity. For example, if there are some tables that get out of sync, there are ways to find them and fix the problem on the spot. Since these are very common issues, we can easily fix these types of problems using utilities, like compare and repair. So, if you find something is out of sync, then you can just repair that table. It basically syncs that table from source to target to see if there are any differences. It will then replicate those differences to the target."

"The synchronization, data backup, and data transfer are all valuable features of the solution."

"The core replication and its performance, which is by far the fastest, along with the way it handles replication to multiple targets with basic filtering and from multiple sources to a single target, is very efficient."

"The core replication and its performance. Performance is crucial, and SharePlex is by far the fastest. The way it handles replication to multiple targets along with basic filtering, as well as from multiple sources to a single target, is very efficient."

"SharePlex has been a good fit for us because it was not as expensive compared to GoldenGate, it was stable compared to AWS DMS, and it was a good product for what we were looking for and within our budget too."

"Because of the volume of the transactions, we heavily use a feature that allows SharePlex to replicate thousands of transactions. It's called PEP, Post Enhancement Performance, and that has helped us scale tremendously."

"It works 100 percent of the time, with little downtime or problems."

More SharePlex pros

Cons

"There should be proper documentation available for the implementation process."

"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."

"The solution has room for improvement in the ETL. They have an ETL, but when it comes to the monitoring portion, Qlik Compose doesn't provide a feature for monitoring."

"There is some scope for improvement around the documentation, and a better UI would definitely help."

"My issues with the solution's stability are owing to the fact that it has certain bugs causing issues in some functionalities that should be working."

"The solution has room for improvement in the ETL. They have an ETL, but when it comes to the monitoring portion, Qlik Compose doesn't provide a feature for monitoring."

"It would be better if the first level of technical support were a bit more technically knowledgeable to solve the problem. I think they could also improve the injection of custom scripts. It is pretty difficult to add additional scripts. If the modeling doesn't give you what you want, and you want to change the script generated by the modeling, it is a bit more challenging than in most other products. It is very good with standard form type systems, but if you get a more complicated data paradigm, it tends to struggle with transforming that into a model."

"I don't think Qlik can be used in a high-volume scenario. It didn't work for us."

More Qlik Compose cons

"I would like more ability to automate installation and configuration in line with some of the DevOps processes that are more mature in the market."

"I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication."

"I would like the solution to have some kind of machine learning and AI capabilities."

"I would like the solution to have some kind of machine learning and AI capabilities. Often, if we want to improve the performance of posting, we have to bump up a parameter. That means we need to stop the process, come up with a figure that we want to bump the parameter up to, and then start SharePlex. Machine learning and AI capabilities for these kinds of improvement would tremendously help boost productivity for us."

"The reporting features need improvement."

"For its function in relation to replication (i.e. filtering), I'd give it a six or seven out of 10. GoldenGate has much more functionality by comparison."

"I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication. For example, if we have a certain way of architecting for a particular database migration and want to change that during a period of time, is that an easy or difficult change? There was a need for us to change the architecture in-between the migration, but we didn't do it. We thought, "This is possibly complicated. Let's not change it in the middle because we were approaching our cutover date." That was one thing that we should have checked with support about for training."

"I would like more ability to automate installation and configuration in line with some of the DevOps processes that are more mature in the market. That would be a considerable improvement."

More SharePlex cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"It's really good value for the money. There are some things they could improve on, but in terms of the pricing, features, and support, as a holistic package, we are not thinking of anything else at this point in time."

"It is not as expensive as Oracle GoldenGate and has worked really well within our budgets."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 14% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 9% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Compose

Compared 9% of the time

WhereScape RED vs Qlik Compose

Compared 7% of the time

Airbyte Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 6% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

Oracle GoldenGate vs SharePlex

Compared 13% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs SharePlex

Compared 8% of the time

SSIS vs SharePlex

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs SharePlex

Compared 6% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SharePlex

Compared 6% of the time

More SharePlex Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

March 2026

Download Qlik Compose product report

Buyer's Guide

SharePlex

March 2026

Download SharePlex product report

Also Known As

Compose, Attunity Compose

Dell SharePlex, SharePlex

Overview

Qlik Sense is a powerful business intelligence tool that offers a range of features to help organizations make faster and more informed decisions. Its primary use cases include operational and financial dashboards, self-service reporting, and centralized access to cross-functional reports. The solution is praised for its mobile platform, ease of use, data-sharing capabilities, and extensibility.

Qlik Sense has helped organizations improve data literacy, reduce time consumed in complex reports, and provide widely available MI to senior stakeholders. It also enables self-service analytics, improves data quality and governance, enhances collaboration, and reduces costs.

Qlik

SharePlex delivers robust database replication and migration capabilities, emphasizing performance, synchronization, and data integrity management. Supporting high availability and real-time data syncing, it serves organizations handling vast transaction volumes, especially in IoT data processing.

SharePlex offers reliable data transfer and efficient multi-target replication. Its features like Compare and Repair utilities assist in maintaining data consistency. With PEP fostering scalability for large transactions, it caters to businesses aiming to cut down migration windows and minimize outages. Users employ SharePlex in real-time syncing and failover scenarios across data centers, crucial for handling extensive transaction data during migrations or upgrades.

What are SharePlex's key features?

Core Replication: Ensures reliable data synchronization across multiple targets.
Data Integrity Management: Maintains accuracy during reading and writing processes.
Compare and Repair Utilities: Facilitate data consistency checks and fixes.
PEP: Enhances performance for large transaction volumes.

Why consider SharePlex for your database needs?

Scalability: Supports large-scale transactions with efficiency.
Minimized Downtime: Provides continuous data availability during operations.
Business Continuity: Enables seamless failover and data center transitions.
Real-time Syncing: Supports time-sensitive data processing requirements.

Organizations in sectors like finance and telecommunications implement SharePlex to maintain uninterrupted operations and ensure quick recovery times. By facilitating database migrations to cloud platforms like AWS, they achieve reduced downtime and enhanced operational efficiency, catering to the rigorous demands of data-driven industries.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Poly-Wood

Bodybuilding.com, Priceline.com, Ameco Beijing, Viasat, SK Broadband

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. SharePlex

March 2026

Free Report: Qlik Compose vs. SharePlex

Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Compose vs. SharePlex and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qlik Compose vs. SharePlex report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.