We performed a comparison between Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus and ThreatQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."
"The most valuable feature is alerting."
"The reporting services are great. With reporting services, if you have customers that just visit a URL you can see the result - including why it's blocked and how and how the URL was first recognized as malicious."
"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it."
"It is a completely cloud-based product at present."
"The solution should be simpler for the end-user in terms of reporting and navigating the product."
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 12th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 2 reviews while ThreatQ is ranked 11th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 1 review. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 8.0, while ThreatQ is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Identifies critical attacks, easy to use, stable, and integrates well ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatQ writes "Good reporting and pretty stable but needs to be simpler to use". Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with Cisco Threat Grid, Recorded Future, Mandiant Advantage, IBM X-Force and ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), whereas ThreatQ is most compared with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), Anomali ThreatStream, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, IntSights and Recorded Future.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
