We performed a comparison between OWASP Zap and Spirent CyberFlood based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Testing (AST) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It scans while you navigate, then you can save the requests performed and work with them later."
"It has improved my organization with faster security tests."
"The most valuable feature is scanning the URL to drill down all the different sites."
"Automatic scanning is a valuable feature and very easy to use."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten. I think it's stable enough. I don't see any crashes within the application, so its stability is high."
"You can run it against multiple targets."
"Simple and easy to learn and master."
"The solution is good at reporting the vulnerabilities of the application."
"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."
"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."
"CyberFlood is flexible."
"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."
"There isn't too much information about it online."
"Lacks resources where users can internally access a learning module from the tool."
"The product should allow users to customize the report based on their needs."
"Sometimes, we get some false positives."
"The documentation is lacking and out-of-date, it really needs more love."
"OWASP Zap needs to extend to mobile application testing."
"Deployment is somewhat complicated."
"They stopped their support for a short period. They've recently started to come back again. In the early days, support was much better."
"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."
"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."
"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."
"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."
OWASP Zap is ranked 8th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 37 reviews while Spirent CyberFlood is ranked 26th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 4 reviews. OWASP Zap is rated 7.6, while Spirent CyberFlood is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of OWASP Zap writes "Great for automating and testing and has tightened our security ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spirent CyberFlood writes "I like the solution's flexibility". OWASP Zap is most compared with SonarQube, Acunetix, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, Qualys Web Application Scanning and Veracode, whereas Spirent CyberFlood is most compared with Ixia BreakingPoint and Ixia BreakingPoint VE. See our OWASP Zap vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.
See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
