Oracle Big Data SQL vs webMethods.io comparison

Oracle and IBM are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Oracle is ranked #16 with an average rating of 10.0, while IBM is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.1. Oracle holds a 0.6% mindshare in CDI, compared to IBM’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Oracle Big Data SQL

Read 2 Oracle Big Data SQL reviews

176 Views
111 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 93 webMethods.io reviews

9,897 Views
1,188 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Oracle Big Data SQL

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

webMethods.io and Oracle Big Data SQL are competing products in the data management and integration category. webMethods.io has the upper hand with its user-friendly interface and ease of integration, while Oracle Big Data SQL offers superior data processing capabilities and scalability.

Features: webMethods.io provides cloud integration, API management, and B2B connectivity, offering robust integration capabilities. Oracle Big Data SQL provides advanced data querying capabilities, integration across various big data sources, and complex data analysis and processing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: webMethods.io offers a simple cloud-based deployment model and responsive customer service. Oracle Big Data SQL, though having a more complex deployment process, delivers comprehensive support documentation and resources.

Pricing and ROI: webMethods.io typically has a more competitive pricing structure with lower initial setup costs, offering better immediate ROI for simpler projects. Oracle Big Data SQL, while potentially more costly upfront, provides substantial long-term ROI with its robust data processing power.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Big Data SQL vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Big Data SQL vs. webMethods.io

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Big Data SQL

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th), API Management (9th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of Oracle Big Data SQL is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 5.0%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Mohamed Moustafa

General Manager at Quit cement

Offers good scalability, strong stability and seamless integration

The user interface is really user-friendly and intuitive. It was a major plus. The integration process was smooth. Oracle's security is good and significantly better than that of other solutions I've encountered. Previously, we had separate data interfaces for 15 concrete mixing plants, requiring manual document creation in Oracle. Now, with integrated automation, production has become much easier and more efficient over the past three years.

Read full review

MohanPrasad

Senior Consultant at Brillio

Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost

webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution can maintain a large volume of data and is flexible to what data it can handle. The performance is very good."

"The user interface is really user-friendly and intuitive."

"From a user perspective, the feature which I like the most about Integration Server is its designer."

"It frankly fills the gap between IT and business by having approval and policy enforcement on each state and cycle of the asset from the moment it gets created until it is retired."

"The performance is good."

"It is a bundled product stack for A2A and B2B usage. It is one of the best products which I have used during my integration career."

"What I like best about webMethods Integration Server is its portfolio of connectors."

"One valuable feature is that it is event-driven, so when new data is available on the source it can be quickly processed and displayed. Integration is definitely another useful feature, and B2B is one area where webMethods has its own unique thing going, whereby we can do monitoring of transactions, monitoring of client onboarding, and so on."

"Application integrations are offered out-of-the-box, and that is extremely important to us. This is one of the main use cases that we have for it. It is about 60 to 70 percent of the workload in our application today."

"Given that you have one integration API in place, it takes very minimal effort to scale it to any other application that might want to use the same. Its flow-based development environment is a breeze and makes it really easy to re-use most of the existing components and build up a new API."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"The solution could improve by adding more advanced features."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing."

"This product has too many gaps. You find them after update installations. This should be covered by automatic testing."

"I would like the solution to provide bi-weekly updates."

"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."

"When migration happens from the one release to an upgraded release from Software AG, many of the existing services are deprecated and developers have to put in effort testing and redeveloping some of the services. It would be better that upgrade releases took care to support the lower-level versions of webMethods."

"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."

"Large file handling is pretty hard comparatively to other middleware tools."

"t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData."

"Support is expensive."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I do see a lack of capabilities inside of the monetization area for them. They have a cloud infrastructure that is pay per use type of a thing. If you already use 1,000 transactions per se, then you can be charged and billed. I see room for improvement there for their side on that particular capability of the monetization."

"The product is very expensive."

"Pricing has to be negotiated with the local Software AG representative. SAG can always prepare an appropriate pricing model for every client."

"Always plan five years ahead and don’t jeopardize the quality of your project by dropping items from the bill of materials."

"Pricing is the number-one downfall. It's too expensive. They could make more money by dropping the price in half and getting more customers. It's the best product there is, but it's too expensive."

"The pricing is a yearly license."

"There is a license needed to use the webMethods Integration Server."

"It is worth the cost."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Big Data SQL?

The user interface is really user-friendly and intuitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Big Data SQL?

There is room for improvement in the pricing.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Big Data SQL?

With Oracle Big Data SQL, I primarily managed data organization and structure. It helped streamline data within the system. I integrated Oracle with other systems. I worked with Oracle integrations...

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Palantir Foundry vs Oracle Big Data SQL

Compared 100% of the time

More Oracle Big Data SQL Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

July 2025

Download Oracle Big Data SQL product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

June 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

A culture of innovation has propelled Oracle since its inception. Today, thanks to exceptional people, we lead the market in autonomous, cloud, and applications technologies.

Oracle

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Big Data SQL vs. webMethods.io

July 2025

Free Report: Oracle Big Data SQL vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Big Data SQL vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Big Data SQL vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.