Oracle Big Data SQL vs webMethods.io comparison

Oracle and IBM are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Oracle is ranked #18 with an average rating of 10.0, while IBM is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.9. Oracle holds a 0.6% mindshare in CDI, compared to IBM’s 5.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Oracle Big Data SQL

Read 2 Oracle Big Data SQL reviews

194 Views
124 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 93 webMethods.io reviews

8,870 Views
1,331 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Oracle Big Data SQL

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

webMethods.io and Oracle Big Data SQL are competing products in the data management and integration category. webMethods.io has the upper hand with its user-friendly interface and ease of integration, while Oracle Big Data SQL offers superior data processing capabilities and scalability.

Features: webMethods.io provides cloud integration, API management, and B2B connectivity, offering robust integration capabilities. Oracle Big Data SQL provides advanced data querying capabilities, integration across various big data sources, and complex data analysis and processing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: webMethods.io offers a simple cloud-based deployment model and responsive customer service. Oracle Big Data SQL, though having a more complex deployment process, delivers comprehensive support documentation and resources.

Pricing and ROI: webMethods.io typically has a more competitive pricing structure with lower initial setup costs, offering better immediate ROI for simpler projects. Oracle Big Data SQL, while potentially more costly upfront, provides substantial long-term ROI with its robust data processing power.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Big Data SQL vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Big Data SQL vs. webMethods.io

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Big Data SQL

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

18th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (11th), API Management (11th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of Oracle Big Data SQL is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 5.2%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
webMethods.io	5.2%
Oracle Big Data SQL	0.6%
Other	94.2%

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Mohamed Moustafa

General Manager at Quit cement

Offers good scalability, strong stability and seamless integration

The user interface is really user-friendly and intuitive. It was a major plus. The integration process was smooth. Oracle's security is good and significantly better than that of other solutions I've encountered. Previously, we had separate data interfaces for 15 concrete mixing plants, requiring manual document creation in Oracle. Now, with integrated automation, production has become much easier and more efficient over the past three years.

Read full review

MohanPrasad

Senior Consultant at Brillio

Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost

webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The user interface is really user-friendly and intuitive."

"This solution can maintain a large volume of data and is flexible to what data it can handle. The performance is very good."

"It frankly fills the gap between IT and business by having approval and policy enforcement on each state and cycle of the asset from the moment it gets created until it is retired."

"The most valuable aspect of this solution for me has been the configuration-based UI. Once you get the hang of it, it enables you to easily develop an API. In addition, it has many in-built policies that are quite handy."

"It’s fairly easy to view, move, and mange access across different components. Different component types are categorized and can be viewed in a web based administration console."

"The core product can be used not only for automatic file transfers between applications, but also as an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."

"webMethods platform is used to build an EAI platform, enabling communication between many internal systems and third-party operators."

"All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value."

"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."

"What I found most valuable in webMethods Integration Server is that it's a strong ESB. It also has strong API modules and portals."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"The solution could improve by adding more advanced features."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing."

"webMethods Integration Server needs to add more adapters."

"Perhaps in the area of Microservices, where I think Trading Networks could benefit from some improvements."

"The orchestration is not as good as it should be."

"The price has room for improvement."

"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."

"Some of the things that we use cannot be done in this solution. For these things, we have to either use a Java service or a util service. There is no predefined or existing service that we can use. So, we have to work on the util service and write on top of it. Its price can also be better. It is pretty costly because they charge us for each transmission."

"webMethods Integration Server could improve on the version control. I'm not sure if Web Method has some kind of inbuilt integration with Bitbucket or GitHub or some kind of version control system. However, that's one area where they can improve."

"The deployment should be simplified."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I signed a three-year deal with them. It is a yearly locked-in price for the next three years."

"Pricing has to be negotiated with the local Software AG representative. SAG can always prepare an appropriate pricing model for every client."

"The solution's development license is free for three to six months. We have to pay for other things."

"I don’t have much idea about prices, but webMethods API Portal is not something cheaper."

"Some of the licensing is "component-ized," which is confusing to new users/customers."

"Sometimes we don't have a very clear idea what the licensing will entail at first, because it can be very customizable. On one hand, this can be a good thing, because it can be tailored to a specific customer's needs. But on the other hand it can also be an issue when some customer asks, "What's the cost?" and we can't yet give them an accurate answer."

"The pricing is a yearly license."

"It is expensive, but we reached a good agreement with the company. It is still a little bit expensive, but we got a better deal than the previous one."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	63

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Big Data SQL?

The user interface is really user-friendly and intuitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Big Data SQL?

There is room for improvement in the pricing.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Big Data SQL?

With Oracle Big Data SQL, I primarily managed data organization and structure. It helped streamline data within the system. I integrated Oracle with other systems. I worked with Oracle integrations...

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Palantir Foundry vs Oracle Big Data SQL

Compared 61% of the time

Elastic Search vs Oracle Big Data SQL

Compared 39% of the time

More Oracle Big Data SQL Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

September 2025

Download Oracle Big Data SQL product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

September 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

A culture of innovation has propelled Oracle since its inception. Today, thanks to exceptional people, we lead the market in autonomous, cloud, and applications technologies.

Oracle

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Big Data SQL vs. webMethods.io

September 2025

Free Report: Oracle Big Data SQL vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Big Data SQL vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Big Data SQL vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.