Oracle Big Data SQL vs webMethods.io comparison

Oracle and IBM are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Oracle is ranked #16 with an average rating of 10.0, while IBM is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.1. Oracle holds a 0.4% mindshare in CDI, compared to IBM’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Oracle Big Data SQL

Read 2 Oracle Big Data SQL reviews

87 Views
63 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 92 webMethods.io reviews

1,348 Views
956 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Oracle Big Data SQL

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

webMethods.io and Oracle Big Data SQL are competing products in the data management and integration category. webMethods.io has the upper hand with its user-friendly interface and ease of integration, while Oracle Big Data SQL offers superior data processing capabilities and scalability.

Features: webMethods.io provides cloud integration, API management, and B2B connectivity, offering robust integration capabilities. Oracle Big Data SQL provides advanced data querying capabilities, integration across various big data sources, and complex data analysis and processing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: webMethods.io offers a simple cloud-based deployment model and responsive customer service. Oracle Big Data SQL, though having a more complex deployment process, delivers comprehensive support documentation and resources.

Pricing and ROI: webMethods.io typically has a more competitive pricing structure with lower initial setup costs, offering better immediate ROI for simpler projects. Oracle Big Data SQL, while potentially more costly upfront, provides substantial long-term ROI with its robust data processing power.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Big Data SQL vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Big Data SQL vs. webMethods.io

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Big Data SQL

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (10th), API Management (10th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of Oracle Big Data SQL is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 4.6%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Mohamed Moustafa

General Manager at Quit cement

Offers good scalability, strong stability and seamless integration

The user interface is really user-friendly and intuitive. It was a major plus. The integration process was smooth. Oracle's security is good and significantly better than that of other solutions I've encountered. Previously, we had separate data interfaces for 15 concrete mixing plants, requiring manual document creation in Oracle. Now, with integrated automation, production has become much easier and more efficient over the past three years.

Read full review

Michele Illiano

Head of Division at Innovery

Can function as an ESB along with the core product, with decent integration of message protocols

I have noticed that webMethods ActiveTransfer has had problems when handling large files. For example, when we receive (and perform operations on) files that are larger than about 16 MB, the software starts losing performance. This is why, for most customers who have to deal with big files, I suggest that they use a product other than ActiveTransfer. I would like to note that this problem mainly concerns large files that undergo extra operations, such assigning, unassigning, or file translation. When these operations take place on large files, ActiveTransfer will use up a lot of resources. Within the product itself, I also believe that there is room for improvement in terms of optimization when it comes to general performance. I suspect that the issues underlying poor optimization are because it is all developed in Java. That is, all the objects and functions that are used need to be better organized, especially when it comes to big files but also overall. webMethods ActiveTransfer was born as an ESB to handle messages, and these messages were typically very short, i.e. small in size. A message is data that you have to send to an application, where it must be received in real-time and possibly processed or acknowledged elsewhere in the system as well. So, because it was initially designed for small messages, it struggles with performance when presented with very large files. All this to say, I suggest that they have an engineer reevaluate the architecture of the product in order to consider cases where large files are sent, and not only small ones. As for new features, compared to other products in the market, I think Software AG should be more up to date when it comes to extra protocol support, especially those protocols that other solutions have included in their products by default. Whenever we need to add an unsupported protocol, we have to go through the effort of custom development in order to work with it. Also, all the banks are obligated to migrate to the new standards, and big companies are all handling translations and operating their libraries with the new protocol formats. But webMethods ActiveTransfer doesn't seem to be keeping up with this evolution. Thus, they should aim to be more compliant in future, along the lines of their competitors such as IBM and Primeur.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution can maintain a large volume of data and is flexible to what data it can handle. The performance is very good."

"The user interface is really user-friendly and intuitive."

"I like the tool's scalability."

"webMethods Integration Server is an easy-to-use solution and does not require a lot of coding."

"I like the stability of the webMethods Integration Server."

"The Software AG Designer has been great. It's very intuitive."

"Best feature is Insight for monitoring, and as a debugging tool. It has saved us a lot of time during crisis situations."

"It is good for communicating between the systems and for publishing and subscribing. We can easily retrieve data. It is good in terms of troubleshooting and other things."

"The development is very fast. If you know what you're doing, you can develop something very easily and very fast."

"There were no complexities involved in the setup phase...The product is able to meet my company's API protection needs."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the pricing."

"The solution could improve by adding more advanced features."

"The logging capability has room for improvement. That way, we could keep a history of all the transactions. It would be helpful to be able to get to that without having to build a standalone solution to do so."

"The solution has big instances when deployed under microservices or in a containerized platform. They need to improve that so that it is competitive with other integration solutions, like Redis and Kafka. Deployments under microservices with those solutions are much more lightweight, in the size of the runtime itself, compared with Software AG."

"Forced migration from MessageBroker to Universal Messaging requires large scale reimplementation for JMS."

"I'd like to see the admin portal for managing the integration server go up a level, to have more capabilities and to be given a more modern web interface."

"I would like the solution to provide bi-weekly updates."

"Large file handling is pretty hard comparatively to other middleware tools."

"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."

"The orchestration is not as good as it should be."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing and licensing costs for webMethods are very high, which is the only reason that we might switch to another product."

"Its cost depends on the use cases."

"It is an expensive tool. I rate the product price a nine out of ten, where ten means it is very expensive."

"The product is very expensive."

"The product is expensive."

"It's a good deal for the money that we pay."

"It is worth the cost."

"Some who consider this solution often avoid it due to its high price."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Big Data SQL?

The user interface is really user-friendly and intuitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Big Data SQL?

There is room for improvement in the pricing.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Big Data SQL?

With Oracle Big Data SQL, I primarily managed data organization and structure. It helped streamline data within the system. I integrated Oracle with other systems. I worked with Oracle integrations...

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Palantir Foundry vs Oracle Big Data SQL

Compared 100% of the time

More Oracle Big Data SQL Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

March 2025

Download Oracle Big Data SQL product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

April 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

A culture of innovation has propelled Oracle since its inception. Today, thanks to exceptional people, we lead the market in autonomous, cloud, and applications technologies.

Oracle

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Big Data SQL vs. webMethods.io

April 2025

Free Report: Oracle Big Data SQL vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Big Data SQL vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Big Data SQL vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.