OpenText Core Application Security and SonarQube Cloud (SonarCloud) both compete in the application security and code analysis market. SonarCloud has the upper hand in seamless CI/CD integration and continuous code feedback, while OpenText Core excels in providing a unified security view with advanced static and dynamic analysis.
Features: OpenText Core Application Security adheres to compliance standards like HIPAA with detailed priority guidance and expert-reviewed results. It offers a unified view of application security by correlating static and dynamic analysis. Its cloud-based nature is ideal for enterprises seeking quick, comprehensive security solutions. SonarCloud specializes in code analysis, identifying security weaknesses, and providing continuous code feedback, enhancing code quality. It integrates easily into workflows, making it suitable for seamless CI/CD integration.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Core needs enhancements in reporting capabilities, integration with incident management, and reducing false positives. Support for more programming languages and improved report visuals would be beneficial. SonarCloud could improve its configuration process and UI, enhance dynamic code analysis capabilities, and provide more comprehensive solutions for fixing issues. Better reporting features to consolidate data effectively are also needed.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Core offers flexible deployment options, including on-premises, cloud, and hybrid setups. Some users report delayed technical support. SonarCloud primarily operates in the public cloud, simplifying deployment but limiting on-premises options. Customer support is generally well-regarded for both, but OpenText users have reported challenges with responsiveness more frequently than SonarCloud users.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Core features a costly license model, but users appreciate its comprehensive security features, deeming it cost-effective for mitigating security breaches. SonarCloud offers pricing based on the number of lines of code, making it more affordable for small to mid-sized organizations. Although some find its pricing high, SonarCloud delivers strong value through continuous code analysis and low setup costs. Both products show ROI in reduced security incidents, with distinct cost structures aligned with organizational needs.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) | 4.2% |
OpenText Core Application Security | 3.7% |
Other | 92.1% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 16 |
Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
Large Enterprise | 43 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 8 |
Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
Large Enterprise | 4 |
OpenText Core Application Security offers robust features like static and dynamic scanning, real-time vulnerability tracking, and seamless integration with development platforms, designed to enhance code security and reduce operational costs.
OpenText Core Application Security is a cloud-based, on-demand service providing accurate and deep scanning capabilities with detailed reporting. Its integrations with development platforms ensure an enhanced security layer in the development lifecycle, benefiting users by lowering operational costs and facilitating efficient remediation. The platform addresses needs for intuitive interfaces, API support, and comprehensive vulnerability assessments, helping improve code security and accelerate time-to-market. Despite its strengths, challenges exist around false positives, report clarity, and language support, alongside confusing pricing and package options. Enhancements are sought in areas like CI/CD pipeline configuration, report visualization, scan times, and integration with third-party tools such as GitLab, container scanning, and software composition analysis.
What features define OpenText Core Application Security?Industries like mobile applications, e-commerce, and banking leverage OpenText Core Application Security for its ability to identify vulnerabilities such as SQL injections. Integrating seamlessly with DevSecOps and security auditing processes, this tool supports developers in writing safer code, ensuring secure application deployment and enhancing software assurance.
SonarQube Cloud offers static code analysis and application security testing, seamlessly integrating into CI/CD pipelines. It's a vital tool for identifying vulnerabilities and ensuring code quality before deployment.
SonarQube Cloud is widely used for its ability to integrate with tools like GitHub, Jenkins, and Bitbucket, providing critical feedback at the pull request level. It's designed to help organizations maintain clean code by acting as a quality gate. This service supports development methodologies including sprints and Kanban for ongoing vulnerability management. While appreciated for its dashboard and integration capabilities, some users find initial setup challenging and note the need for enhanced documentation. The recent addition of mono reports and microservices support offers deeper insights into security and code quality, though container testing limitations and false positives are noted drawbacks. Manual intervention is sometimes required to address detailed reporting, with external tools being necessary for comprehensive analysis. Notifications for larger teams during serious issues and streamlined integration of new features are also areas of improvement.
What are the key features of SonarQube Cloud?In specific industries, SonarQube Cloud finds application in finance and healthcare where code integrity and security are paramount. It allows teams to identify critical vulnerabilities early and ensures that software development aligns with industry regulations and standards. By continuously analyzing code, it aids organizations in deploying secure and reliable applications, fostering trust and compliance.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.