NetApp Global File Cache vs Varnish Cloud comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
164
Comparisons
89
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
463
Comparisons
427
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
NetApp
Video Not Available
Overview

NetApp’s proven intelligent Global File Cache allows distributed enterprises to securely consolidate silos of file servers into one cohesive global storage footprint in the public cloud, which streamlines overall IT management, significantly cuts costs and boosts business productivity on a global scale.

Varnish technology channels the power of caching to deliver performance, scalability and reliability for fast and flexible web and API content delivery. With HTTP and the Varnish Configuration Language (VCL), Varnish Cloud offers caching solutions to deliver all types of content and gain full control over how you deliver, monitor and customize your delivery.

Sample Customers
FACTO GEO, RobertBird Group, METROMONT
University of Helsinki, Servcorp, Zype, Com Hem, University of Wuppertal
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company21%
Comms Service Provider11%
Construction Company8%
Media Company8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business35%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise51%

NetApp Global File Cache is ranked 7th in In-Memory Data Store Services while Varnish Cloud is ranked 5th in In-Memory Data Store Services. NetApp Global File Cache is rated 0.0, while Varnish Cloud is rated 0.0. On the other hand, NetApp Global File Cache is most compared with , whereas Varnish Cloud is most compared with Azure Cache for Redis and Amazon ElastiCache.

See our list of best In-Memory Data Store Services vendors.

We monitor all In-Memory Data Store Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.