Neo4j AuraDB vs Redis comparison

Neo4j and RedisLabs are both solutions in the Managed NoSQL Databases category. Neo4j is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.9, while RedisLabs is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.7. Neo4j holds a 5.2% mindshare in MND, compared to RedisLabs’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Neo4j users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of RedisLabs users who would recommend it.

Neo4j AuraDB

Read 7 Neo4j AuraDB reviews

539 Views
539 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Redis

Read 23 Redis reviews

4,722 Views
142 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Neo4j AuraDB

Redis

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2025

Redis and Neo4j AuraDB compete in the database solutions category, each addressing unique data management requirements. Redis tends to have the upper hand in performance and scalability, while Neo4j AuraDB excels in handling complex relationships and graph data.

Features: Redis is favored for its fast data processing, in-memory storage, and support for various data structures like strings, hashes, and sets, making it effective for caching, real-time analytics, and session management. Neo4j AuraDB shines in its graph database capabilities, supporting advanced graph algorithms and facilitating complex relationship queries, benefiting applications focused on connectivity and network dynamics.

Room for Improvement: Redis could expand its on-disk storage options and improve handling of more complex data structures beyond real-time processing. Neo4j AuraDB would benefit from simplified schema design, more user-friendly query interfaces, and improved integration with diverse data sources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Redis is praised for its straightforward setup and supportive community, enabling rapid deployment and technical assistance. Neo4j AuraDB's managed service simplifies deployment but requires more specialized knowledge in schema design. Both feature strong support, with Redis noted for simplicity and faster deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Redis offers low setup costs and substantial ROI due to its open-source nature and efficient resource use, with more affordable scalability. Neo4j AuraDB requires higher initial investment, but provides significant ROI for projects leveraging its graph capabilities, offering value through advanced analytics that justify higher expenses for specific use cases.

To learn more, read our detailed Neo4j AuraDB vs. Redis Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Neo4j AuraDB vs. Redis

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Neo4j AuraDB

Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases

8th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Redis

Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases

9th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

NoSQL Databases (7th), In-Memory Data Store Services (1st), Vector Databases (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Managed NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Neo4j AuraDB is 5.2%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Redis is 3.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed NoSQL Databases Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Neo4j AuraDB	5.2%
Redis	3.1%
Other	91.7%

Managed NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Jeff Dalgliesh

Founder at data2

Room for improvement in interface capabilities while rapidly solving domain-specific problems

Neo4j AuraDB is a great tool for understanding connections between things. The best features Neo4j AuraDB offers are that it is easy to quickly build a solution with their tooling. Regarding the tooling, I love how fast it is that you can use NeoDash to quickly mock up a UI, and it is really nice that you can build a GraphQL endpoint to connect it to third-party applications, such as Retool or custom applications that we build for clients. Neo4j AuraDB has impacted my organization positively as it has helped me solve problems much more quickly. A specific example of a problem I solved more quickly with Neo4j AuraDB is that I was able to work with an LLM to build graph data models for domain-specific problems. The collaboration with the LLM and Neo4j AuraDB sped up my process as I'm building a tool on top of Neo4j that allows me to control how I can access data in the graph, and Neo4j had a nice interface that allowed us to work with their underlying data model.

Read full review

Yaseer Arafat

.Net Developer at Freelance

Unmatched Performance and Scalability for Modern Applications

Redis has room for improvement in a few areas. Enhanced tools for managing and monitoring clusters would be beneficial, as would built-in security mechanisms like advanced encryption and granular access controls. Simplifying setup and configuration could make Redis more accessible to new users. Introducing more enterprise-grade features, such as better multi-tenancy support and improved backup and restore capabilities, would also be advantageous. For the next release, it would be great to see enhanced cluster management tools, native multi-region supports for better data redundancy, integrated analytics for deeper insights, AI and ML integration features, and improved developer experience through enhanced SDKs and tools.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From my experience, I particularly like the professional version. Initially, developers often start with the free variant. Once the project grows, we switch to the professional version, which offers multiple databases, expanded memory, and better scalability. This allows us to handle more data and use cloud scaling features."

"The most beneficial things in terms of AuraDB are its speed, its good pricing, the multi-cloud availability."

"The best features Neo4j AuraDB offers are that it is easy to quickly build a solution with their tooling."

"Integrating the front-end language with Neo4j AuraDB is a very easy process."

"I like the idea of graphs and nodes and the possibilities Neo4j AuraDB offers."

"The tool is easy to use."

"The most valuable features of Neo4j AuraDB include its flexible data model and broad language support."

"Redis has multiple valuable features such as being a free and reliable open-source tool."

"Redis acts as an in-memory search tool that improves the speed of operations."

"Redis provides an easy setup and operation process, allowing users to quickly connect and use it without hassle."

"The in-memory data makes it fast."

"The product offers fast access to my database."

"The solution is fast, provides good performance, and is not too expensive."

"The ability to fetch and save data quickly is valuable."

"It makes operations more efficient. The information processing is very fast, and very responsive. It's all about the technology."

More Redis pros

Cons

"In terms of AuraDB, the conversations have always been around scalability."

"I've experienced it crashing a few times, so stability could be better."

"I would love to see a Retool type of interface builder with Neo4j AuraDB."

"Some features can help if they can visualize graphs better."

"There’s room for improvement in Neo4j AuraDB, especially on the developer side. The learning curve can be steep, and the interface for developing and pushing code can be unnecessarily complex. It might be beneficial to simplify this process to help developers ramp up more quickly. Working with graph databases like Neo4j can be more challenging than standard databases, particularly for juniors and those new to graph technology. Streamlining the development process could make it easier for new users to get up to speed. This would be particularly useful for teams with less experience in graph databases. If I could add a feature to Neo4j AuraDB, I’d focus on improving the Bloom interface. It’s excellent for visualizing smaller datasets, but navigating through it becomes challenging as the data grows—say, past 100,000nodes. The interface works well for beginners but doesn’t scale effectively for more advanced users of large datasets. I want a UI that bridges the gap between the easy-to-use Bloom interface and more complex, text-based tools. This would help manage larger datasets more efficiently and improve performance."

"During the product's initial setup phase, there were some issues due to disconnections in the tool's network."

"It's actually quite expensive."

"Redis should have an option to operate without Docker on a local PC."

"The development of clusters could improve. Additionally, it would be helpful if it was integrated with Amazon AWS or Google Cloud."

"Redis could be improved by introducing a GUI to display key-value pair database information, as it is currently a CLI tool with no visual representation."

"There is a lack of documentation on the scalability of the solution."

"In future releases, I would like Redis to provide its users with an option like schema validation. Currently, the solution lacks to offer such functionality."

"For the PubSub feature, we had to create our own tools to monitor the events."

"The initial setup took some time as our technical team needed to familiarize themselves with Redis."

More Redis cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Neo4j AuraDB is reasonably priced, especially considering it removes the need for cloud administration and associated costs. It's a good deal for the professional version, as it includes managed services, which reduces the overhead compared to setting up your own infrastructure. The cost can be higher for enterprise-scale projects, but that's often due to the scale and complexity of the project rather than the product itself. Startups sometimes overestimate their needs and jump to enterprise pricing too quickly, leading to higher costs than necessary."

"The tool's enterprise edition is very expensive."

"I am using an open-source version of Neo4j AuraDB."

"I used the free tier."

"Redis is an open-source solution. There are not any hidden fees."

"Redis is an open-source product."

"The tool is open-source. There are no additional costs."

"We saw an ROI. It made the processing of our transactions faster."

"Redis is not an overpriced solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

32%

Educational Organization

10%

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

12%

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Neo4j AuraDB?

It has fair pricing.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Neo4j AuraDB?

My main use case for Neo4j AuraDB is solving water optimization problems for oil and gas operations. Neo4j AuraDB helps us resolve those water optimization problems by allowing us to store knowledg...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Neo4j AuraDB?

My advice to others looking into using Neo4j AuraDB is to consider how many graphs you can create as quickly as needed. I think Neo4j AuraDB is doing some amazing things. On a scale of 1-5, I rate ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Redis?

Redis is better tested and is used by large companies. I haven't found a direct alternative to what Redis offers. Plus, there are a lot of support and learning resources available, which help you u...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Redis?

The disadvantage of Redis is that it's a little bit hard to have too many clusters or too many nodes and create the clusters. The sync between the nodes is easier to implement with Couchbase, for e...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Redis?

Redis is used for a part of a booking engine for travel, specifically for the front part to get some sessions and information about the sessions. If a customer or user is using the sites in differe...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon Neptune vs Neo4j AuraDB

Compared 41% of the time

MongoDB Atlas vs Neo4j AuraDB

Compared 34% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Neo4j AuraDB

Compared 25% of the time

More Neo4j AuraDB Competitors

Red Hat Data Grid vs Redis

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Coherence vs Redis

Compared 10% of the time

Chroma vs Redis

Compared 8% of the time

ScyllaDB vs Redis

Compared 6% of the time

Upstash vs Redis

Compared 5% of the time

More Redis Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Neo4j AuraDB

September 2025

Download Neo4j AuraDB product report

Buyer's Guide

Redis

September 2025

Download Redis product report

Also Known As

No data available

Redis Enterprise

Overview

Neo4j AuraDB offers seamless integration with Python, Java, and Go, efficiently handles real-time data, and is hosted on AWS Cloud for reliable, scalable, and multi-cloud support across GCP, Azure, and Amazon.

Neo4j AuraDB is appreciated for its flexible data models and dedicated query language, ideal for network correlation and graph analysis. It provides scalability with expanded memory and supports multiple databases. While users enjoy its speed and AI data handling capabilities, challenges include stability, with occasional crashes and a need for a more intuitive cloud interface. Enhancements in simplifying the development process and improving the Bloom interface for large datasets are desired. Although documentation is positive, it could be streamlined. Scalability in large projects is a recurring concern alongside a more user-friendly setup for less experienced teams.

What are Neo4j AuraDB's standout features?

Seamless language integration: Works well with Python, Java, and Go.
Cloud hosting: Reliable hosting on AWS with GCP and Azure compatibility.
Scalability: Offers expanded memory and support for multiple databases.
Real-time data handling: Efficient for AI and analytics projects.
Flexible data model: Supports network correlation and relationship-centric modeling.

What benefits should users expect?

Cost-effective pricing: Multi-cloud availability ensures competitive rates.
Rapid analysis: Swiftly handles data point relationships.
Graph visualization: Enables effective illustration of graph schemas.
Project scalability: Supports resource aggregation and AI applications.

Research teams use Neo4j AuraDB to learn cipher language and gather data from platforms like Hacker News. It is vital for graph data access, participant engagement, and projects like connecting food data or investment insights. Companies needing scalable cloud interfaces and swift data analysis in generative AI contexts benefit significantly, achieving effective data point connection with robust documentation.

Neo4j

Redis offers high-speed, in-memory storage, renowned for real-time performance. It supports quick data retrieval and is used commonly in applications like analytics and gaming.

Renowned for real-time performance, Redis delivers high-speed in-memory storage, making it a favorite for applications needing quick data retrieval. Its diverse data structures and caching capabilities support a broad array of use cases, including analytics and gaming. Redis ensures robust scalability with master-slave replication and clustering, while its publish/subscribe pattern renders it reliable for event-driven applications. The solution integrates smoothly with existing systems, minimizing performance tuning needs. Although documentation on scalability and security could be improved, Redis remains cost-effective and stable, commonly utilized in cloud environments. Enhancing integration with cloud services like AWS and Google Cloud and refining GUI may improve usability.

What are the key features of Redis?

High Speed: In-memory data storage for swift access.
Scalability: Master-slave replication and clustering for growth.
Data Structures: Supports diverse types for varied uses.
Persistence: RDB snapshots and AOF logs ensure durability.
Integration: Seamless integration reduces tuning efforts.

What should users look for in Redis reviews?

Performance: Real-time data retrieval boosts efficiency.
Cost-Effectiveness: Stable, budget-friendly implementation.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse environments and platforms.
Reliability: Ensures data persistence and high availability.

Redis finds application across industries for tasks like caching to improve application performance and speed, minimizing database load. It enables real-time processing for session storage, push notifications, and analytics. As a messaging platform, Redis handles high traffic and supports replication and clustering for cross-platform scalability.

RedisLabs

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

1. Twitter 2. GitHub 3. StackOverflow 4. Pinterest 5. Snapchat 6. Craigslist 7. Digg 8. Weibo 9. Airbnb 10. Uber 11. Slack 12. Trello 13. Shopify 14. Coursera 15. Medium 16. Twitch 17. Foursquare 18. Meetup 19. Kickstarter 20. Docker 21. Heroku 22. Bitbucket 23. Groupon 24. Flipboard 25. SoundCloud 26. BuzzFeed 27. Disqus 28. The New York Times 29. Walmart 30. Nike 31. Sony 32. Philips

Buyer's Guide

Neo4j AuraDB vs. Redis

September 2025

Free Report: Neo4j AuraDB vs. Redis

Find out what your peers are saying about Neo4j AuraDB vs. Redis and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Neo4j AuraDB vs. Redis report.

See our list of best Managed NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all Managed NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.