Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Neo4j AuraDB comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 31, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced
Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
Open Source Databases (5th), NoSQL Databases (1st)
Neo4j AuraDB
Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Managed NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is 7.8%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Neo4j AuraDB is 5.8%, up from 5.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed NoSQL Databases
 

Featured Reviews

Uzair Faruqi - PeerSpot reviewer
Transforms data flow with adaptable schema and smooth public cloud deployment
One of our business units uses MongoDB, and we developed an ETL pipeline that extracts data from MongoDB and transfers it into our data warehouse MongoDB is a NoSQL database that is similar to a document database. It offers flexibility in schema adaptation, allowing us to change the schema and…
Erle Pereira - PeerSpot reviewer
A graph database, purpose built to leverage relationships in data, enabling lightning-fast queries for real-time analytics and insights
There’s room for improvement in Neo4j AuraDB, especially on the developer side. The learning curve can be steep, and the interface for developing and pushing code can be unnecessarily complex. It might be beneficial to simplify this process to help developers ramp up more quickly. Working with graph databases like Neo4j can be more challenging than standard databases, particularly for juniors and those new to graph technology. Streamlining the development process could make it easier for new users to get up to speed. This would be particularly useful for teams with less experience in graph databases. If I could add a feature to Neo4j AuraDB, I’d focus on improving the Bloom interface. It’s excellent for visualizing smaller datasets, but navigating through it becomes challenging as the data grows—say, past 100,000nodes. The interface works well for beginners but doesn’t scale effectively for more advanced users of large datasets. I want a UI that bridges the gap between the easy-to-use Bloom interface and more complex, text-based tools. This would help manage larger datasets more efficiently and improve performance.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The geospatial index feature is useful for dealing with latitude and longitude data."
"I like the schemaless architecture that it follows. I also like the sharding that it provides."
"The most valuable feature is the speed of MongoDB."
"MongoDB is fast and efficient."
"like its performance and the stability. It's very stable and, performance-wise, it's really great."
"We've found the product to be scalable."
"MongoDB has definitely helped us improve our network monitoring and reporting dashboard, so I would say it has impacted our operations positively overall."
"We haven't had any issues with stability."
"Integrating the front-end language with Neo4j AuraDB is a very easy process."
"The most valuable features of Neo4j AuraDB include its flexible data model and broad language support."
"I like the idea of graphs and nodes and the possibilities Neo4j AuraDB offers."
"From my experience, I particularly like the professional version. Initially, developers often start with the free variant. Once the project grows, we switch to the professional version, which offers multiple databases, expanded memory, and better scalability. This allows us to handle more data and use cloud scaling features."
"The most beneficial things in terms of AuraDB are its speed, its good pricing, the multi-cloud availability."
"The tool is easy to use."
 

Cons

"I would like to see the scalability and security improved."
"I would recommend MongoDB as part of a template if anyone is considering free and open-source templating services such as LibreNMS, but as a standalone, I couldn't advise."
"The MongoDB documentation can be a little complicated sometimes."
"The performance can be improved."
"The scalability of the solution has room for improvement."
"The analytics needs improvement."
"People coming from RDBMS should have the flexibility to write queries in SQL that can be converted into JSON queries."
"They could improve the UI and the analytics part."
"In terms of AuraDB, the conversations have always been around scalability."
"I've experienced it crashing a few times, so stability could be better."
"During the product's initial setup phase, there were some issues due to disconnections in the tool's network."
"Some features can help if they can visualize graphs better."
"There’s room for improvement in Neo4j AuraDB, especially on the developer side. The learning curve can be steep, and the interface for developing and pushing code can be unnecessarily complex. It might be beneficial to simplify this process to help developers ramp up more quickly. Working with graph databases like Neo4j can be more challenging than standard databases, particularly for juniors and those new to graph technology. Streamlining the development process could make it easier for new users to get up to speed. This would be particularly useful for teams with less experience in graph databases. If I could add a feature to Neo4j AuraDB, I’d focus on improving the Bloom interface. It’s excellent for visualizing smaller datasets, but navigating through it becomes challenging as the data grows—say, past 100,000nodes. The interface works well for beginners but doesn’t scale effectively for more advanced users of large datasets. I want a UI that bridges the gap between the easy-to-use Bloom interface and more complex, text-based tools. This would help manage larger datasets more efficiently and improve performance."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an open-source solution."
"You only have to pay for the paid version, not the open-source version."
"I believe that the licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
"MongoDB has a free version. You can also buy the enterprise edition, which is cheaper than Oracle."
"I only used the open-source version."
"There is an enterprise license and it could be cheaper. We are using the free open source version."
"We are using the Community Edition of MongoDB."
"We use the open-source version, which is available to use free of charge."
"Neo4j AuraDB is reasonably priced, especially considering it removes the need for cloud administration and associated costs. It's a good deal for the professional version, as it includes managed services, which reduces the overhead compared to setting up your own infrastructure. The cost can be higher for enterprise-scale projects, but that's often due to the scale and complexity of the project rather than the product itself. Startups sometimes overestimate their needs and jump to enterprise pricing too quickly, leading to higher costs than necessary."
"I used the free tier."
"The tool's enterprise edition is very expensive."
"I am using an open-source version of Neo4j AuraDB."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
University
8%
Computer Software Company
30%
Educational Organization
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about MongoDB?
MongoDB's approach to handling data in documents rather than traditional tables has been particularly beneficial.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB?
We pay approximately 2,000 euros per month for MongoDB.
What needs improvement with MongoDB?
I'm not sure about the documentation or the knowledge bases available for MongoDB because I don't interact with it at that level, but I would say it's minimal and could be improved. I am not experi...
What is your primary use case for Neo4j AuraDB?
I worked on a project focused on the quality of public menus, using Neo4j AuraDB to connect and create relationships between food items. This allowed us to visualize data in interesting ways and id...
What advice do you have for others considering Neo4j AuraDB?
Neo4j AuraDB is a powerful graph database that enables us to accomplish impressive tasks. Specifically, as a cloud-based service, it eliminates the need for a high-performance computer to use it. S...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Facebook, MetLife, City of Chicago, Expedia, eBay, Google
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs. Neo4j AuraDB and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.