We performed a comparison between Microsoft .NET Framework and Windows Server AppFabric based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."If we take low code, no code platform such as RPA platforms, you might end up writing 100 lines of code and you might do it in a single line of code using. NET."
"The most valuable features for us are web frameworks like MVC, Web API, and WCS."
"The .NET Framework is a very good framework. It does what I need it to do."
"In-built refactoring and .Net profilers are the most valuable features of the solution."
"A great solution for creating program solutions in a framework for Microsoft Windows quickly and easily."
"I like that ASP.NET is used for the framework and the core web services."
"When we talk about .NET development, we use Visual Studio IDE to create these things. In recent years, there have been a lot of improvements in Visual Studio 2022. It would be a daunting task to list all of the features that have benefited us, as it would require a lot of time and effort. However, there are definitely many improvements year after year in .NET development."
"The most valuable feature is the financial accounting."
"It is very usable and easy to understand. Antivirus and VPN are the main features being used now. It allows my clients to access the network from home, which was very crucial because of the pandemic."
"The product's deployment phase was very easy."
"The most valuable feature is AppFabric's hosting solution, which is what we need for running workflows."
"The learning curve could be improved."
"They could enhance support for Python within Visual Studio, as integrating Microsoft products with other frameworks can present a steep learning curve."
".NET Is still heavy or dependant on other Microsoft libraries and frameworks."
"The pricing is a bit expensive."
"If Microsoft would provide a monthly subscription at a cost that a developer can afford then it would be really helpful."
"If AI could be incorporated in Microsoft .NET Framework it would be helpful."
"The solution could improve by optimizing the memory for better performance."
"They should have more training materials available that are specific to .NET. We spend a lot of money training our engineers."
"Microsoft will stop supporting the product next year, and we can't run unsupported programs in our systems."
"Its price and licensing policy can be improved. It could be a little cheaper. Licensing is sometimes confusing. There are so many different options. It is difficult to find out what to buy or what to choose for my necessity."
"The product is unable to connect with different cloud services."
Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews while Windows Server AppFabric is ranked 18th in Application Infrastructure with 3 reviews. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4, while Windows Server AppFabric is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Windows Server AppFabric writes "Offers good monitoring capabilities and ease of setup". Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, Apache Web Server, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and Windows Process Activation Services, whereas Windows Server AppFabric is most compared with IIS.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.