We performed a comparison between Microsoft .NET Framework and SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."The most valuable thing about Microsoft .NET Framework is that it is an enterprise-grade language and platform."
"Microsoft .NET Framework’s most valuable features are web application development, RESTful services development, security, performance, and less memory footprint."
"The addition of generics to handle common functionality across types, and the more recent upgrade of the dataset to the Entity Framework, has cut development time drastically, while increasing quality and confidence between builds."
"Microsoft .NET Framework reduces the cost of entry and enables the development of applications with mature and enterprise features, thereby lowering the entry barriers."
"The product has a good interface and easy-to-use programming language."
"It facilitated the streamlined scheduling process by amalgamating inputs from various sources, including location data and other systems."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft .NET Framework is debugging."
"In my opinion, the best thing about Microsoft .NET is the fully featured framework. It provides most of the things which a normal developer requires of any application out of the box."
"There are many features of the solution that are quite useful. For us, the most valuable aspect may be visibility."
"I would want the product to be integrated with the different AI tools in the future since it is one of the areas where the product has certain shortcomings."
"The product's price is an area of concern, making it an area where improvements are required."
"There are performance constraints when multiple users are accessing the application and that consumes CPU resources."
"Microsoft could improve .NET Framework by providing more resources to help users understand the solution."
"I would like more web integration."
"Better integration with other tools to make the operation faster would be an improvement."
"Difficult to scale this product for large organizations."
"Microsoft .NET Framework has a steep learning curve, which could be improved."
"The solution could improve its user interface."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews while SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management is ranked 25th in Application Infrastructure. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4, while SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management writes "First Look – SAP NetWeaver Decision Service Management". Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Apache Web Server and Windows Process Activation Services, whereas SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management is most compared with Azul Zulu.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.