Microsoft Azure File Storage and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP offer robust cloud storage solutions, but differences in features, ease of deployment, and pricing influence user preferences. Azure File Storage has a slight edge due to its broad compatibility and easier deployment.
Features: Microsoft Azure File Storage integrates seamlessly with other Azure services and offers broad compatibility. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP provides advanced data management capabilities and efficiency in large-scale workloads. Users find NetApp's features more comprehensive overall.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure File Storage needs more flexible data replication options, improved performance during high-demand periods, and advanced data security features. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP should enhance global support, simplify deployment processes, and expand its integration capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure File Storage is noted for its straightforward deployment and reliable customer support, making it an accessible choice for many. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, while offering powerful capabilities, can be more complex to deploy. Its customer service garners mixed reviews due to varied regional support.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure File Storage offers competitive pricing with a clear, scalable cost structure, providing a satisfactory ROI. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, though higher in cost, delivers significant ROI through its advanced features and efficiency gains in large-scale environments.
The perspective documentation is good.
Microsoft technical support is very prompt.
As and when we require, they are able to provide solutions or guide us toward solutions.
We successfully handled a huge transaction during an iPhone launch without any issues.
I rate the stability of Microsoft Azure File Storage as a seven out of ten.
We sometimes encounter glitches with bigger files, but everything else works as expected.
The information is not readily available on the internet, so we have to double-check and understand everything.
There is a limitation on the storage capacity, like four terabytes.
Some chunking logics need to be better to address issues with processing bigger files.
My opinion is that support is generally very good. There are instances where they take longer to respond or resolve issues, especially when customers have urgent needs, but ultimately, resolution is achieved.
I would rate it three or three and a half out of ten on the pricing scale.
I would rate the pricing of Microsoft Azure File Storage seven or eight, where one is high and ten is low.
The pricing for Microsoft Azure File Storage is five out of ten, not so expensive and not so low.
Scalability in Microsoft Azure File Storage is impressive.
File storage is complemented by OCR with Azure Cognitive Service.
It is satisfying our requirements with encryption and security features in place.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Azure File Storage | 9.6% |
| NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP | 7.1% |
| Other | 83.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 53 |
Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol
Key scenarios:
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
