Lacework FortiCNAPP vs Tenable.io Container Security comparison

Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Tenable.io Container Security

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Lacework FortiCNAPP

Ranking in Container Security

23rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (25th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (14th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (20th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (15th), Compliance Management (8th)

Tenable.io Container Security

Ranking in Container Security

24th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of Lacework FortiCNAPP is 1.7%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable.io Container Security is 1.1%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Security

Featured Reviews

Carlos Vitrano

Cloud security director at Medallia

Provides quick visibility and significantly reduces alerts

Its integrations with third-party SIEMs can be better. That is one of the things that we discussed with them. We have integrations, for instance, with Splunk. The data that we are receiving in Splunk is huge, and it is valid because Lacework has a bunch of data that they can provide to you. However, to be able to import the data and create alerts, we needed to do some work, so integration is one of the things that they can improve. For container security, how they scan images and how they provide results is something that they need to continue improving in terms of visibility. We already have visibility to several artifacts, but they can take that to the next level and see what else they can do. There can be better integrations with CI/CD pipelines. There can be improvements in terms of how we can take action or how we can report from the number of inventories they are providing to us.

Read full review

Jahanzeb Feroze Khan

Assistant Manager Network Security at Institute of Business Administration, Karachi

Improves organizational security with features like scanning, reporting, and troubleshooting

Tenable.io Container Security has improved our security. The tool's most valuable feature is scanning, reporting, and troubleshooting. Tenable.io Container Security should improve integration modules. It should also improve stability. I have been working with the product for two years. I…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For the most part, out-of-the-box, it tells you right away about the things you need to work on. I like the fact that it prioritizes alerts based on severity, so that you can focus your efforts on anything that would be critical/high first, moderate second, and work your way down, trying to continue to improve your security posture."

"There are many valuable features that I use in my daily work. The first are alerts and the event dossier that it generates, based on the severity. That is very insightful and helps me to have a security cap in our infrastructure. The second thing I like is the agent-based vulnerability management, which is the most accurate information."

"The most valuable feature, from a compliance perspective, is the ability to use Lacework as a platform for multiple compliance standards. We have to meet multiple standards like PCI, SOC 2, CIS, and whatever else is out there. The ability to have reports generated, per security standard, is one of the best features for me."

"The most valuable aspects are identifying vulnerabilities—things that are out there that we aren't aware of—as well as finding what path of access attackers could use, and being able to see open SSL or S3 buckets and the like."

"Lacework is helping a lot in reducing the noise of the alerts. Usually, whenever you have a tool in place, you have a lot of noise in terms of alerts, but the time for an engineer to look into those alerts is limited. Lacework is helping us to consolidate the information that we are getting from the agents and other sources. We are able to focus only on the things that matter, which is the most valuable thing for us. It saves time, and for investigations, we have the right context to take action."

"The most valuable feature is Lacework's ability to distill all the security and audit logs. I recommend it to my customers. Normally, when I consult for other customers that are getting into the cloud, we use native security tools. It's more of a rule-based engine."

"I find the cloud configuration compliance scanning mature. It generates a lot of data and supports major frameworks like ISO 27001 or SOC 2, providing reports and datasets. Another feature I appreciate is setting custom alerts for specific events. Additionally, I value the agent-based monitoring and scanning for compute nodes. It gives us deeper insights into our workloads and helps identify vulnerabilities across our deployed assets."

"The best feature, in my opinion, is the ease of use."

More Lacework FortiCNAPP pros

"The solution shows you the exploitable vulnerabilities and helps you prioritize."

"Nessus scanner is very effective for internal penetration testing."

"Currently, I haven't implemented the solution due to its deprecation by the site. However, I can highlight some benefits of Tenable Cloud Security, a cybersecurity solution with various features for scanning vulnerabilities in both cloud environments and on-premises container security."

"The tool's most valuable feature is scanning, reporting, and troubleshooting."

"Tenable.io detects misconfiguration when you deploy a Docker or Kubernetes container. It's much better to remedy these issues during deployment instead of waiting until the container is already in the production environment."

"It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, it is a good solution."

"It helps us secure our applications from the build phase and identify the weaknesses from scratch."

"The strong security provided by the product in the container environment is its most valuable feature."

Cons

"A feature that I have requested from them is the ability to sort alerts and policies based on a security framework. Right now, when you go into alerts, you have hundreds and hundreds of them that you have to manually pick. It would be useful to have categories for CIS Benchmark or SOC 2 and be able to display all the alerts and policies for one security framework."

"Its integrations with third-party SIEMs can be better. That is one of the things that we discussed with them."

"The configuration and setup of alerts should be easier. They should make it easier to integrate with systems like Slack and Datadog. I didn't spend too much time on it, but to me, it wasn't as simple as the alerting that I've seen on other systems."

"The solution lacks a cohesive data model, making extracting the necessary data from the platform challenging. It uses its own LQL query language, and each database across different layers and modules is structured differently, complicating correlation efforts. Consequently, I had to create extensive custom reports outside Lacework because their default dashboards didn't communicate risk metrics. They're addressing these issues by redesigning their tools, including introducing the dashboard, which is a step closer to actionable insights but still needs refinement."

"Lacework lacks remediation features, but I believe they're working on that. They're focused on the reporting aspect, but other features need to improve. They're also adding some compliance features, so it's not worth saying they need to get better at it."

"Visibility is lacking, and both compliance-related metrics and IAM security control could be improved."

"There are a couple of the difficulties we encounter in the realm of cybersecurity, or security as a whole, that relate to potentially limited clarity. Having the capacity to perceive the configuration aspect and having the ability to contribute to it holds substantial advantages, in my view. It ranks high, primarily due to its role in guaranteeing compliance and the potential to uncover vulnerabilities, which could infiltrate the system and introduce potential risks. I had been exploring a specific feature that captured my interest. However, just yesterday, I participated in a product update session that announced the imminent arrival of this feature. The feature involves real-time alerting. This was something I had been anticipating, and it seems that this capability is now being integrated, possibly as part of threat intelligence. While anomaly events consistently and promptly appear in the console, certain alerts tend to experience delays before being displayed. Yet, with the recent product update, this issue is expected to be resolved. Currently, a comprehensive view of all policies is available within the console. However, I want a more tailored display of my compliance posture, focusing specifically on policies relevant to me. For instance, if I'm not subject to HIPAA regulations, I'd prefer not to see the HIPAA compliance details. It's worth noting that even with this request, there exists a filtering mechanism to control the type of compliance information visible. This flexibility provides a workaround to my preference, which is why it's challenging for me to definitively state my exact request."

"The biggest thing I would like to see improved is for them to pursue and obtain a FedRAMP moderate authorization... I don't believe they have any immediate plans to get FedRAMP moderate authorized, which is a bit of a challenge for us because we can only use Lacework in our commercial environment."

More Lacework FortiCNAPP cons

"Tenable.io Container Security should improve integration modules. It should also improve stability."

"They need to work on auto-remediation so it's easier for the security team to act quickly when certain assets or resources are deployed. The latest version has a CIS benchmark that you need to meet for containers in the cloud, but more automation is needed."

"The stability and setup phase of the product are areas with shortcomings where improvements are needed."

"I believe integration plays a crucial role for Tenable, particularly in terms of connecting with other products and various container solutions like Docker or Kubernetes. It seems that in future updates, enhanced integration is something I would appreciate. Currently, there is integration with Docker, but when it comes to Kubernetes or other container solutions, it appears to be a challenge, especially with on-prem scanners."

"The initial setup is highly complex."

"I feel that in certain areas this product has false positives which the company should work on. They should also try to include business logic vulnerabilities in the scanner testing. Finally, the vulnerability assessment feature should be increased to other hardware devices, apart from firewalls."

"The support is tricky to reach, so we would like better-oriented technical support enabled."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My smaller deployments cost around 200,000 a year, which is probably not as expensive as Wiz."

"It is slightly expensive. It depends on how big your environment is, but it is expensive. Right now, we are spending a lot of money. We have covered all of the cloud providers and most of our colocation facilities as well, so we cannot complain, but it is slightly expensive. It is not super expensive."

"The pricing has gotten better. That scenario was somewhat unstable. They have a rather interesting licensing structure. I believe you get 200 resources per "Lacework unit." It was difficult, in the beginning, to figure out exactly what a "resource" was... That was a problem until about a year or so ago. They have improved it and it has stabilized quite a bit."

"The licensing fee was approximately $80,000 USD, per year."

"I rate the product’s pricing a six out of ten."

"It's best to be an institutional buyer and directly contact the sales team as they can provide over-the-top discounts for bulk orders."

"I rate the tool's pricing a three out of ten."

"The solution's pricing is neither cheap nor very expensive."

"The product does not operate on a pay-per-license model."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

University

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Lacework?

Polygraph compliance is a valuable feature. In our perspective, it delivers significant benefits. The clarity it offers, along with the ability to identify and address misconfigurations, is invalua...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lacework?

My smaller deployments cost around 200,000 a year, which is probably not as expensive as Wiz.

What needs improvement with Lacework?

The solution lacks a cohesive data model, making extracting the necessary data from the platform challenging. It uses its own LQL query language, and each database across different layers and modul...

What do you like most about Tenable.io Container Security?

The tool's most valuable feature is scanning, reporting, and troubleshooting.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable.io Container Security?

The solution's pricing is neither cheap nor very expensive.

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Container Security?

The solution’s pricing could be improved.

Wiz vs Lacework FortiCNAPP

Comparisons

Compared 21% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Lacework FortiCNAPP

Compared 16% of the time

AWS GuardDuty vs Lacework FortiCNAPP

Compared 6% of the time

Tenable Cloud Security vs Lacework FortiCNAPP

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Lacework FortiCNAPP

Compared 4% of the time

More Lacework FortiCNAPP Competitors

Trivy vs Tenable.io Container Security

Compared 26% of the time

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes vs Tenable.io Container Security

Compared 12% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Tenable.io Container Security

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs Tenable.io Container Security

Compared 10% of the time

Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs Tenable.io Container Security

Compared 7% of the time

More Tenable.io Container Security Competitors

Product Reports

Lacework FortiCNAPP

Download Lacework FortiCNAPP product report

Container Security

Download Tenable.io Container Security product report

Also Known As

Polygraph, FortiCNP

Tenable FlawCheck, FlawCheck

Overview

Lacework FortiCNAPP provides robust cloud security, combining vulnerability management and multi-cloud insight with user-friendly controls, machine learning detection, and compliance support.

Lacework FortiCNAPP specializes in cloud security by merging machine learning anomaly detection with agent-based vulnerability management to offer detailed alerts and compliance reports. Its comprehensive approach allows continuous monitoring across AWS and Kubernetes, providing insights from an attacker's perspective. The platform offers automation and seamless Slack integration, facilitating collaborative and efficient cloud security management. Users value its ability to handle multi-cloud environments and scan IAC scripts, configurations, and compute nodes across AWS and GCP.

What are the key features?

Machine Learning Detection: Identifies anomalies effectively.
Compliance Reports: Provides precise compliance documentation.
Vulnerability Management: Supports agent-based vulnerability assessments.
Multi-Cloud Support: Manages and secures across multiple cloud providers.
Automation and Collaboration: Enables integration with Slack for streamlined communication.
Custom Alerts: Allows creation of personalized alerts for better focus.

What benefits do users expect?

Reduced Alert Noise: Minimizes distractions with filtered alerts.
Efficient Cloud Security: Automates processes for enhanced security management.
Collaboration Support: Integrates with tools like Slack.
Insightful Perspective: Provides insight from an attacker's viewpoint.

Organizations across sectors leverage Lacework FortiCNAPP for cloud security, focusing on compliance, security posture, and vulnerability management. It is widely used for monitoring AWS and Kubernetes environments, scanning IAC scripts, configurations, and securing compute nodes. It supports multi-cloud security posture management and log ingestion, enabling companies to maintain strong cloud infrastructures without dedicated security layers.

Fortinet

Tenable.io Container Security is a container security platform that delivers end-to-end visibility of Docker container images, providing vulnerability assessment, malware detection, and policy enforcement before and after deployment. It also integrates into your DevOps pipeline to eliminate security blind spots without slowing down software development. In addition, Tenable.io Container Security provides proactive visibility and security so your organization can solve the security challenges of containers at the speed of DevOps.

Tenable.io Container Security Features

Tenable.io Container Security has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Dashboard visibility: With Tenable.io Container Security, IT security managers gain at-a-glance visibility into container image inventory as well as security. Security teams can view vulnerability, malware, and other security data for all container images, and the distribution of vulnerabilities across images by CVSS score and risk level. The product also shows each image’s OS, OS version, and architecture.

Malware protection: The Tenable.io Container Security solution is unique because it is one of the only container security solutions that assesses container image source code for malware. It is designed with a custom-built malware detection engine to help ensure images are malware-free and to analyze container image source code.

Policy enforcement: If an image is created that exceeds the organization’s risk threshold, Tenable.io Container Security notifies developers immediately, with layer-specific information provided to help remediate issues rapidly. In addition, when using the solution, policy violations can trigger alerting or can optionally block specific images from being deployed. Policies can be applied globally or only to images in specific repositories.

Image syncing from third-party registries: The solution helps your organization gain instant insight into container security risks by synchronizing your existing registry images into Tenable.io Container Security. It integrates with Docker Registry, Docker Trusted Registry, JFrog Artifactory and Amazon EC2 Container Registry.

DevOps toolchain integration: In DevOps environments, Tenable.io Container Security can embed security testing into the software development tooling without blocking or disrupting existing software workflows or development processes.

Tenable.io Container Security Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Tenable.io Container Security. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Accurate, in-depth visibility: The platform helps you understand the individual layers of container images so you can gain an accurate view of cyber risk, reduce false positives, and provide detailed remediation guidance.

Securely accelerate DevOps: With Tenable.io Container Security, you can assess container images for vulnerabilities and malware as fast as 30 seconds from within the DevOps toolchain to avoid slowing down code velocity.

Enforce security policies: Tenable.io Container Security works to block new container builds that exceed your organizational risk thresholds to ensure containers are compliant with your security policies prior to deployment.

Decrease remediation costs: Tenable.io Container Security can help your organization dramatically reduce remediation costs by discovering and fixing software defects during development before application release.

Protect running containers: By implementing Tenable.io Container Security, you can gain visibility into running containers, which helps you to detect new vulnerabilities and security issues that may show up after deployment.

Tenable

Sample Customers

J.Crew, AdRoll, Snowflake, VMWare, Iterable, Pure Storage, TrueCar, NerdWallet, and more.

ServiceMaster

Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Tenable.io Container Security