Ivanti Secure Access vs OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise comparison

Ivanti and OpenVPN are both solutions in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category. Ivanti is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenVPN is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.8. Ivanti holds a 2.1% mindshare in EIV, compared to OpenVPN’s 13.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ivanti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of OpenVPN users who would recommend it.

Ivanti Secure Access

Read 3 Ivanti Secure Access reviews

617 Views
617 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenVPN Access Server Enter...

Read 50 OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise reviews

7,208 Views
6,848 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Ivanti Secure Access

OpenVPN Access Server Enter...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 31, 2025

OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise and Ivanti Secure Access compete in the VPN space, offering secure remote access solutions. Ivanti Secure Access holds the upper hand with its feature-rich package despite OpenVPN presenting favorable pricing and support.

Features: OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise is recognized for robust scalability, straightforward deployment, and versatile management. Ivanti Secure Access provides advanced security features, comprehensive compliance options, and a diverse set of tools aimed at enterprise-grade security. The notable difference is Ivanti's focus on security capabilities, contrasting with OpenVPN's emphasis on scalability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise offers an efficient setup process, supported by responsive customer service. Ivanti Secure Access, with extensive deployment options, may require a more complex setup but provides detailed documentation and support resources. OpenVPN is characterized by its simplicity in deployment, whereas Ivanti offers a more complex but well-supported procedure.

Pricing and ROI: OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise generally offers a cost-effective setup, providing strong ROI through lower initial costs. Ivanti Secure Access, though potentially higher in setup cost, supports significant ROI with advanced functionalities aimed at enhancing security measures. The main difference lies in OpenVPN's affordability compared to Ivanti's feature-justified pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed Ivanti Secure Access vs. OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Secure Access vs. OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Secure Access

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

25th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenVPN Access Server Enter...

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category, the mindshare of Ivanti Secure Access is 2.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise is 13.0%, down from 15.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

Featured Reviews

BabarShahbaz

Saleas Lead at Juniper Networks

A cloud solution to access the corporate network with BYOD policy

Ivanti Secure Access and Zscaler provide secure access to corporate networks, their methods and features may differ. Ivanti Secure Access offers granular control over network access, allowing for on-demand VPN connections when accessing corporate resources. This means users may not need to initiate a VPN connection manually but can access resources seamlessly when accessing corporate websites or applications. This granular feature helps enhance security and user experience by providing secure access only when needed.

Read full review

LAWAL YUSUF

IT auditor at SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY

Has robust features for encryption and stability

We use the product for secure remote access, including WiFi and IoT device security The product has strong encryption and scalability features. It provides security for private network connections. The product’s connectivity is very slow. It could be faster. We have been using OpenVPN Access…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The scalability of Pulse Client is good."

"The most valuable feature of Pulse Client is integration with Google authenticator for two-factor authentication."

"It also provides an auto-connect feature. When you turn on your laptop and put it on auto-connect, it automatically connects."

"We use the solution to access remote services."

"Two-factor authentication allows us to not force frequent password changes."

"The initial setup phase of OpenVPN Access Server was fine, and it was easy."

"It is easy to use."

"Its most valuable feature is that it is open source."

"It is much easier to scale and troubleshoot compared to regular Windows-based VPN solutions or PPTP daemon."

"The most valuable feature is that I can access my local network remotely and avoid doing all the port forwarding and redirections, and so on."

"The solution is reliable, easy to use, and open source. It's free at no cost."

More OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise pros

Cons

"Pulse Client could improve the system tokens for authentication."

"Pulse Client could improve the reports. The reports are not in PDF and we can't check the details in the reports of users who are using the VPNs."

"Ivanti Secure Access and Zscaler provide secure access to corporate networks, their methods and features may differ."

"It would be nice with all these features, if they could send some examples of each one; just small sample scripts to look at and say, "Oh okay, I could expand on this." That would help us a lot."

"OpenVPN could improve in centralized management and enhance the GUI configuration steps."

"The server configuration file needs to be improved, it's the biggest problem in the configuration process."

"Open VPN Access Server could be more user-friendly."

"The stability of the solution could improve."

"If there was a Graphical User Interface to help streamline the configuration, I believe OpenVPN would probably venture more into the non-geek realm as it were."

"It requires some experience of Linux server configuration to set it up."

"If we had to create something for someone who was not necessarily tech savvy, I had to set that up on their computer, I had to write "read me's" and other things so that they could install their client and then connect to the VPN by themselves. So it was hard to set up for people who are not tech savvy."

More OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pulse Client has two types of licenses. One is subsistence-based and the second is perpetual-based. The license cost is good, it is not very costly."

"OpenVPN Access Server is free and open source."

"The solution is free of cost."

"Open VPN Access Server is open-source and free of charge."

"The solution was free of charge."

"I would say the product's pricing is a good value. I would recommend to other companies to implement it. I've seen other software, in tandem with the service, to be very expensive."

"OpenVPN is a free and open-source solution."

"Begin with the community version and upgrade to paid one if the need arises."

"The price point is fantastic since it is free."

More OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Computer Software Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

10%

University

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Pulse Client?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Pulse Client?

We use the solution to access the corporate network.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Pulse Client?

The tool is a preferred option for making the tunnel from these cloud VPNs. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

See all answers

How does Fortinet FortiClient compare with Open VPN Access Server?

Fortinet FortiClient is a feature-rich solution that is easy to use and deploy without sacrificing safety and security. It has a very fast connection rate and has a built-in VPN. With this solution...

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenVPN Access Server?

OpenVPN Access Server is a simple and easy-to-use solution that I can use myself without anybody's help.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenVPN Access Server?

We recommend checking the compliance you need for the project and picking the product that meets those requirements within the best price. For us, it was OpenVPN.

See all answers

Comparisons

Ivanti Connect Secure vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 70% of the time

Tailscale vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 7% of the time

SonicWall SMA vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 6% of the time

More Ivanti Secure Access Competitors

Fortinet FortiClient vs OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise

Compared 22% of the time

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway vs OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

SonicWall Netextender vs OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

Check Point Remote Access VPN vs OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) vs OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

July 2025

Download Ivanti Secure Access product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise

August 2025

Download OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise product report

Also Known As

Pulse Client

OpenVPN

Overview

Easily secure your hybrid workforce Elevate your VPN experience with Ivanti Neurons for Secure Access—a unified platform that seamlessly integrates Ivanti Connect Secure and Ivanti Neurons for Zero Trust Access. Harness the power of cloud-based centralization to gain real-time insights, optimize access management and enhance security across your network. Take control and thrive in today's borderless digital landscape.

Ivanti

OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise provides secure, scalable remote access with strong encryption and cross-platform compatibility, leveraging open-source flexibility for cost-effectiveness. It's ideal for connecting remote workers, maintaining privacy, and securing network communications.

OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise is renowned for its ease of setup and adaptability, supporting Linux and different operating systems, which ensures robust security and seamless integration across network scenarios. With features like two-factor authentication and customizable installers, it emphasizes privacy and remote connectivity. While it offers robust documentation and community support, there are challenges with user management due to the lack of a simple GUI. Users note stability issues under heavy traffic, and improvements in security features and configuration automation are desired. Despite these areas for enhancement, it remains a reliable choice for secure remote access.

What are the key features?

Easy Setup: Hassle-free installation process facilitates quick deployment
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Supports Linux and different operating systems for widespread utility
Strong Encryption: Secures data with advanced encryption technologies
Two-Factor Authentication: Enhances security through additional authentication layer
Customizable Installers: Allows personalized installation process to suit organizational preferences

What benefits and ROI should users seek?

Cost-Effectiveness: Open-source nature reduces licensing costs
User-Friendliness: Comprehensive documentation and community support ease the implementation
Scalability: Adapts to growing connectivity and bandwidth needs
Enhanced Security: Provides secure access to network resources and data

In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise secures sensitive data while enabling remote access across LANs and VPCs. It's utilized for encrypted traffic protection, facilitating site-to-site VPNs, and connecting mobile workers securely, thus maintaining data integrity in interoffice communications and IoT platforms.

OpenVPN

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Verizon, Amazon, Disney, HP, Microsoft, IBM, Samsung

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Secure Access vs. OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise

July 2025

Free Report: Ivanti Secure Access vs. OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Secure Access vs. OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ivanti Secure Access vs. OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise report.

See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.