Infraon IMS vs VMware vCenter comparison

EverestIMS and Broadcom are both solutions in the Server Monitoring category. EverestIMS is ranked #35, while Broadcom is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6. EverestIMS holds a 0.9% mindshare in SM, compared to Broadcom’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of EverestIMS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Infraon IMS

Read 8 Infraon IMS reviews

1,027 Views
257 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMware vCenter

Read 37 VMware vCenter reviews

733 Views
733 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Infraon IMS

VMware vCenter

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

Infraon IMS and VMware vCenter are two leading products in infrastructure management. While VMware vCenter provides more comprehensive features that many feel justify its higher cost, Infraon IMS offers competitive pricing and strong support.

Features: Infraon IMS users highlight its customizable dashboards, ease of integration with other tools, and straightforward deployment. VMware vCenter users emphasize its robust virtualization management, extensive feature set, and advanced capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Infraon IMS could improve in documentation, advanced integration capabilities, and feature set expansion. VMware vCenter could benefit from simpler licensing terms, reduced complexity, and enhanced user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Infraon IMS is praised for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. VMware vCenter users report a more complex deployment process but commend the detailed guidance and support provided.

Pricing and ROI: Infraon IMS is acknowledged for its cost-effectiveness and satisfactory ROI. VMware vCenter users find the initial setup cost higher but believe the long-term value justifies the investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Infraon IMS vs. VMware vCenter Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Infraon IMS vs. VMware vCenter

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infraon IMS

Ranking in Server Monitoring

35th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (90th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (56th), Cloud Monitoring Software (52nd)

VMware vCenter

Ranking in Server Monitoring

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Server Monitoring category, the mindshare of Infraon IMS is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware vCenter is 1.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Server Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
VMware vCenter	1.4%
Infraon IMS	0.9%
Other	97.7%

Server Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Maharajan S

VSO at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Provides data accuracy for availability and policy harmonization

The reporting capabilities are a challenge and could be improved. We have been trying to connect to it from our help desk ticketing system, because the ticketing system manages asset tracking, which has been a bit challenging for us. Otherwise, they give some reports that are okay, but we do not use them much because we work in the dashboard. This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure. I can take the report and show it to them from a compliance point of view. However, the moment we go to a SaaS model, I don't have control of the data and where the data is stored. I don't receive any complaints-based reports from the SaaS model.

Read full review

Hoang Long Nguyen

IT Infrastructure and Architect Specialist at a transportation company with 201-500 employees

Automation and technical support impress with seamless migration and high availability management

We are in the process of implementing Zerto, which is currently in the purchase order phase. While we haven't fully implemented it yet, we have completed the POC. We use VMware vCenter and ESXi. The solution manages high availability effectively, with excellent automation for migration and patch management. The support is good, though the recent license change after the Broadcom acquisition has significantly increased costs. Patch management is controllable and can be managed individually, with automatic downloads available. We use it primarily for managing hosts and updates, without any integration. The performance is excellent, running very smoothly. I rate VMware vCenter a 9 out of 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature that I like the most and the best part is the customization."

"Their discovery is very quick and they have a CSV file upload mechanism that allows you to onboard five thousand devices a day."

"Our response time is within 30 minutes for any support. This solution provides alerts immediately, so we are within our SLA, giving efficiency to our support."

"The most valuable feature is alerting. We get email alerts when a link is down that tell us which device is having a problem."

"We use the solution to automatically trigger processes to help us resolve issues. The whole IT process has been automated, such as trying to map all the users and the escalation process. So, if any issue happens, we get an SMS and WhatsApp of the report. If there is a critical issue this has to be sorted out, like the entire data center being down, then there is an alarm."

"It is a stable product. After the initial configuration, you don't have to tweak it much. All systems of Everest IMS work perfectly."

"The role-based dashboards provide data points and charts and topology diagrams in a single window. It's like a spider web, where the application, connectivity, and everything is defined for each user of those applications."

"The backup, restore, and comparison features are all good."

"The initial setup is easy."

"It is easier to manage a larger number of nodes per cluster. Currently, if we are managing a minimum of 64 nodes in a single cluster, that capacity can be increased."

"One feature I really like about VMware vCenter is its ability to change hosts easily. It is highly available and very useful for our operations."

"The product is scalable."

"I integrated with VMware products, which makes integration easy."

"I am using vMotion for live migration and storage migrations. I can use vCenter for both now."

"The filtering capabilities also enhance scalability by optimizing resource allocation."

"The performance monitoring tools within vCenter help track resource usage, identify performance bottlenecks, and optimize the efficiency of virtual environments."

More VMware vCenter pros

Cons

"I would like to see an integrated view of Infraon IMS and Infraon Desk. It would be very helpful if that were integrated into the solution."

"There might be some features in other products that are currently not there in Everest IMS and can be included. I have not yet compared it with any other product."

"I would like to have the option to add a new device or meet with the next release. Right now, it needs to be done from the backend which results in a heavy reliance on R&D."

"The GUI is in need of improvement. It is not drag-and-drop or easy to use."

"The graphical view of the topology does not show us all of the connectivity in our network, which is something that could be improved."

"We have enquired if there are any possibilities of monitoring non-IPBS devices."

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure."

"Email support is a bit slow. Once you drop an email, it takes time."

"vCentre licensing cost is on the higher side as well."

"The process of creating VLANs or any similar tasks requires following a specific procedure, which must be executed accurately to ensure successful deployment. That's the main concern."

"There is a feature called Fault Tolerance (FT), which has been part of vCenter servers since the product's inception. However, it has a lot of complexity, and when my team tested it, we found it difficult to manage. It also has some bugs. Consequently, we decided not to offer any fault tolerance features to our customers."

"Enhancing the product's capabilities on the backend could be beneficial."

"We face some upgrade patch management issues."

"The support for the Linux operating system wasn't great when we used it."

"They could provide an easier way to learn NSX and troubleshooting processes for the product."

"Efficiency and redundancy can be increased, minimizing or mitigating downtime."

More VMware vCenter cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is calculated on a per-user basis."

"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product. We evaluated five to six products and finally felt Infraon was better because of the pricing model, especially because it was more flexible."

"The pricing is reasonable, given the features that they provide."

"The cost model is within our budget. I have less than 180 critical assets, but the moment that I have 1,000 assets, then the license model is totally different. I don't know whether they are capable of handling that kind of a load. They could revisit the licensing model."

"I think that the pricing for this solution is reasonable and varies by number of devices."

"We pay for a number of devices on the accounts and since it is on-premises, we pay the maintenance charges for the year."

"The platform is highly-priced."

"The pricing is significantly high."

"We utilize the basic licenses of the product."

"The product is affordable for now."

"The solution is expensive."

"The platform has reasonable pricing."

"The solution is pretty expensive for small businesses because there are few lower-scale VMware vCenter solutions."

"The tool used to be worth the money, but after Broadcom acquired it and changed the pricing structure to subscription-only, it became too expensive for us to continue using. Unfortunately, we haven't found any alternative solutions that meet our needs, so this is a significant drawback for us as we explore other options."

More VMware vCenter pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

18%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware vCenter?

The filtering capabilities also enhance scalability by optimizing resource allocation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware vCenter?

The initial package for VMware vCenter is not less than $10,000, which can be prohibitive for smaller organizations. The licensing model now requires purchasing 96-core solutions, even if fewer cor...

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware vCenter?

The main concern is the license change following the sale to Broadcom. The license cost has increased significantly, which is the primary negative aspect of VMware vCenter. While technical support ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Infraon IMS

Compared 14% of the time

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs Infraon IMS

Compared 13% of the time

Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS

Compared 12% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Infraon IMS

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs Infraon IMS

Compared 8% of the time

More Infraon IMS Competitors

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs VMware vCenter

Compared 21% of the time

Zabbix vs VMware vCenter

Compared 15% of the time

HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) vs VMware vCenter

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs VMware vCenter

Compared 11% of the time

NinjaOne vs VMware vCenter

Compared 10% of the time

More VMware vCenter Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infraon IMS

January 2026

Download Infraon IMS product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware vCenter

January 2026

Download VMware vCenter product report

Also Known As

Everest IMS

No data available

Overview

Infraon IMS offers network monitoring with real-time dashboards, customizable GUIs, and integrated tools, supporting device management and workflow automation efficiently.

Infraon IMS delivers stable performance with features tailored for easy customization and detailed network management. Users benefit from real-time monitoring through role-based dashboards and integrated ticketing tools. However, improvements in reporting, GUI usability, and AI integration are needed. Challenges include monitoring non-IPBS devices and improving connectivity visibility. Users require seamless Infraon Desk integration, ease of device addition, and enhanced topology views.

What are the key features of Infraon IMS?

Stable Performance: Provides consistent network oversight.
Customizable Dashboards: Role-based, interactive GUIs for tailored views.
Real-Time Monitoring: Comprehensive network visibility and alerts.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines operational processes.
Configuration Backup: Ensures data integrity and easy recovery.
Granular Reporting: Delivers detailed insights and analysis.
Intuitive Interface: Enhances user interaction and experience.
Quick Device Discovery: Facilitates effective network management.
Email Alerts: Keeps users informed on device status.
CSV Upload: Manages high-volume device data efficiently.

What benefits do users find in Infraon IMS?

Centralized Access: Simplifies firewall and device management.
Enhanced IT Management: Improved monitoring of uptime, downtime, and utilization.
Flexible Deployment: Support for global locations with cloud and on-premises options.
Link Monitoring Automation: Boosts operational efficiency.

In industries like IT infrastructure and data center management, Infraon IMS is utilized for network monitoring and managing key components such as leased lines and firewalls. Its capabilities aid diverse geographical locations in overseeing data centers, offering centralized monitoring and access to critical infrastructure.

EverestIMS

VMware vCenter provides centralized management for virtual machines, offering enhanced resource control, high availability, and data protection. Its integration with NSX and vSAN simplifies infrastructure management, although improvements in pricing, licensing, and technical support are needed.

VMware vCenter streamlines the management of virtual infrastructures, facilitating scalability and elasticity through features like DRS, vMotion, and snapshot capabilities. While users appreciate its centralized control and extensive integration options, complexities in interface and upgrades are seen as challenges. Issues like fragmented licensing, difficult Fault Tolerance management, and high resource demands have been highlighted, alongside the need for enhanced security, monitoring, and seamless cloud integration. vCenter is widely used in data centers for overseeing large virtual environments, integrating cloud services, and providing infrastructure as a service.

What are the main features of VMware vCenter?

Centralized Management: Enables efficient control of virtual infrastructures.
High Availability: Ensures minimal downtime for critical applications.
DRS and vMotion: Enhances resource scheduling and migration capabilities.
Data Protection: Offers robust backup and recovery tools.
Integration: Seamlessly works with NSX and vSAN for simplified management.
Snapshot Capabilities: Facilitates quick recovery and testing scenarios.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Resource Efficiency: Optimizes CPU and memory usage within the infrastructure.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines management tasks, reducing manual efforts.
Scalability: Supports growing enterprise needs through flexible infrastructure management.
Cost Management: While improvements are needed, centralized control can lead to reduced operational costs.

Industries such as IT, finance, healthcare, and government deploy VMware vCenter to manage their extensive virtual environments. Users rely on its automation and centralized management capabilities to ensure high performance and uptime in data center operations, often leveraging it to integrate with cloud services.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Airtel, BSNL, BlackBox Corporation, ACT, Geojit, Canara Bank, Federal Bank, Corporation Bank, Birla Corporation, CESC Limited, Mphasis, GAIL, Udaan, Cowrks, SEBI, PowerGrid, ION, Summit Communications, National Information Technology Center (Nepal), Bhutan National Bank, Servion T, Greenlam, Translab Technologies, CMSIT Services, Nelco, HPCL, Navitas Life Sciences etc.

1. Amazon 2. Apple 3. ATT 4. Bank of America 5. Cisco Systems 6. CocaCola 7. Dell 8. ebay 9. Facebook 10. Google 11. HP 12. IBM 13. Intel 14. JPMorgan Chase 15. LinkedIn 16. Microsoft 17. Netflix 18. Oracle 19. PayPal 20. SAP 21. Siemens 22. Tesla 23. Toyota 24. Twitter 25. Visa 26. Walmart 27. WeWork 28. World Bank

Buyer's Guide

Infraon IMS vs. VMware vCenter

January 2026

Free Report: Infraon IMS vs. VMware vCenter

Find out what your peers are saying about Infraon IMS vs. VMware vCenter and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infraon IMS vs. VMware vCenter report.

See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.