Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Infraon IMS vs VMware vCenter comparison

EverestIMS and VMware are both solutions in the Server Monitoring category. EverestIMS is ranked #28, while VMware is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6. EverestIMS holds a 0.3% mindshare in SM, compared to VMware’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of EverestIMS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of VMware users who would recommend it.
Infraon IMS
Read 8 Infraon IMS reviews
  • 173 Views
  • 89 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
VMware vCenter
Read 36 VMware vCenter reviews
  • 187 Views
  • 80 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

Infraon IMS and VMware vCenter are two leading products in infrastructure management. While VMware vCenter provides more comprehensive features that many feel justify its higher cost, Infraon IMS offers competitive pricing and strong support.

Features: Infraon IMS users highlight its customizable dashboards, ease of integration with other tools, and straightforward deployment. VMware vCenter users emphasize its robust virtualization management, extensive feature set, and advanced capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Infraon IMS could improve in documentation, advanced integration capabilities, and feature set expansion. VMware vCenter could benefit from simpler licensing terms, reduced complexity, and enhanced user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Infraon IMS is praised for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. VMware vCenter users report a more complex deployment process but commend the detailed guidance and support provided.

Pricing and ROI: Infraon IMS is acknowledged for its cost-effectiveness and satisfactory ROI. VMware vCenter users find the initial setup cost higher but believe the long-term value justifies the investment.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Infraon IMS vs. VMware vCenter Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Infraon IMS vs. VMware vCenter
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Infraon IMS
Ranking in Server Monitoring
28th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (87th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (60th), Cloud Monitoring Software (44th)
VMware vCenter
Ranking in Server Monitoring
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Server Monitoring category, the mindshare of Infraon IMS is 0.3%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware vCenter is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Server Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Maharajan S - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides data accuracy for availability and policy harmonization
The reporting capabilities are a challenge and could be improved. We have been trying to connect to it from our help desk ticketing system, because the ticketing system manages asset tracking, which has been a bit challenging for us. Otherwise, they give some reports that are okay, but we do not use them much because we work in the dashboard. This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure. I can take the report and show it to them from a compliance point of view. However, the moment we go to a SaaS model, I don't have control of the data and where the data is stored. I don't receive any complaints-based reports from the SaaS model.
Read full review
SivaKuppala - PeerSpot reviewer
Performance monitoring tools help track resource usage, identify performance bottlenecks, and optimize the efficiency of virtual environments
It is like a single point of failure. In an environment, vCenter is deployed as a single instance, which represents a single point of failure. The concern here is that tasks such as provisioning, monitoring, and maintenance may be impacted until the server is restored. This only affects management; users are not impacted. But, again, management capabilities will be impacted. The entire system goes down until recovery is completed. You will not be able to provision new VDI. Also, vCenter requires a lot of additional resources for managing capabilities. It uses a significant amount of CPU, memory, and network bandwidth, which can sometimes slow down. Proper sizing is important for vCenter so that it does not impact end-users. vCentre licensing cost is on the higher side as well.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The backup, restore, and comparison features are all good."
"It is a stable product. After the initial configuration, you don't have to tweak it much. All systems of Everest IMS work perfectly."
"Our response time is within 30 minutes for any support. This solution provides alerts immediately, so we are within our SLA, giving efficiency to our support."
"The role-based dashboards provide data points and charts and topology diagrams in a single window. It's like a spider web, where the application, connectivity, and everything is defined for each user of those applications."
"The most valuable feature is alerting. We get email alerts when a link is down that tell us which device is having a problem."
"Their discovery is very quick and they have a CSV file upload mechanism that allows you to onboard five thousand devices a day."
"We use the solution to automatically trigger processes to help us resolve issues. The whole IT process has been automated, such as trying to map all the users and the escalation process. So, if any issue happens, we get an SMS and WhatsApp of the report. If there is a critical issue this has to be sorted out, like the entire data center being down, then there is an alarm."
"The feature that I like the most and the best part is the customization."
"I can say that the product is stable because we have been using the tool for the last fifteen years in our company, and there has been no issue."
"One feature I really like about VMware vCenter is its ability to change hosts easily. It is highly available and very useful for our operations."
"The initial setup is a very user-friendly process. Installation and configuration are easy."
"Some of the most valuable features of vCenter are LACP and vSphere Distributed Switches, as they simplify VLAN propagation between hosts and enable networking duplication and replication."
"We must create a VIN on each node. You want to make the VIN ten times if you have a thin host. We mostly create VMs, and the vCenter publishes the template on all hosts."
"The platform is very effective for managing virtual infrastructure. It has improved our virtual infrastructure and virtual machine deployment in several ways."
"I am using vMotion for live migration and storage migrations. I can use vCenter for both now."
"The filtering capabilities also enhance scalability by optimizing resource allocation."
More VMware vCenter pros
 

Cons

"The GUI is in need of improvement. It is not drag-and-drop or easy to use."
"The graphical view of the topology does not show us all of the connectivity in our network, which is something that could be improved."
"Email support is a bit slow. Once you drop an email, it takes time."
"We have enquired if there are any possibilities of monitoring non-IPBS devices."
"I would like to have the option to add a new device or meet with the next release. Right now, it needs to be done from the backend which results in a heavy reliance on R&D."
"I would like to see an integrated view of Infraon IMS and Infraon Desk. It would be very helpful if that were integrated into the solution."
"There might be some features in other products that are currently not there in Everest IMS and can be included. I have not yet compared it with any other product."
"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure."
"The monitoring features are limited."
"There needs to be improvement in the pricing model, as the host license is already very high, and customers should have more open options for creating automation scenarios out of the box."
"The scalability could be enhanced."
"VMware vCenter does not have a centralized security dashboard, and it is pretty tedious to configure."
"It could display the status of the storage space in terabytes, the number of VMs, etc."
"The technical support team could respond faster."
"The main issue with VMware vCenter is its pricing and licensing model. The licensing model has shifted, leading to higher costs, particularly for smaller organizations."
"Sometimes, vCenter management can be difficult if you forget the password. You can't change or recover the password easily. We then have to reinstall vCenter, which means reconfiguring everything. That's a challenge we've encountered."
More VMware vCenter cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost model is within our budget. I have less than 180 critical assets, but the moment that I have 1,000 assets, then the license model is totally different. I don't know whether they are capable of handling that kind of a load. They could revisit the licensing model."
"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product. We evaluated five to six products and finally felt Infraon was better because of the pricing model, especially because it was more flexible."
"We pay for a number of devices on the accounts and since it is on-premises, we pay the maintenance charges for the year."
"I think that the pricing for this solution is reasonable and varies by number of devices."
"Licensing is calculated on a per-user basis."
"The pricing is reasonable, given the features that they provide."
"For the healthcare industry, the price is considerably higher than the education industry."
"We have purchased monthly licenses for the platform. There are additional costs involved."
"VMware vCenter is not expensive."
"The solution is pretty expensive for small businesses because there are few lower-scale VMware vCenter solutions."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."
"The product is affordable for now."
"The product is expensive."
"The platform has reasonable pricing."
More VMware vCenter pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Construction Company
11%
Real Estate/Law Firm
11%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...
See all answers
What do you like most about VMware vCenter?
The filtering capabilities also enhance scalability by optimizing resource allocation.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware vCenter?
The pricing and setup cost are rated seven out of ten. It is mentioned that the price might be a little lower to increase customer adoption. The specific details of the financial cost were not prov...
See all answers
What needs improvement with VMware vCenter?
The performance is well, however, i didnot use different products to say my opinion.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

ManageEngine OpManager vs Infraon IMS Logo
ManageEngine OpManager vs Infraon IMS
Compared 38% of the time
Zabbix vs Infraon IMS Logo
Zabbix vs Infraon IMS
Compared 33% of the time
Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS Logo
Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS
Compared 29% of the time
More Infraon IMS Competitors
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs VMware vCenter Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs VMware vCenter
Compared 100% of the time
More VMware vCenter Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Infraon IMS
April 2025
Infraon IMS reportDownload Infraon IMS product report
Buyer's Guide
VMware vCenter
April 2025
VMware vCenter reportDownload VMware vCenter product report
 

Also Known As

Everest IMS
No data available
 

Overview

Infraon IMS is used for monitoring network status, managing critical IT infrastructure, and ensuring connectivity. It helps organizations automate processes, gain network insights, and manage firewalls in private and cloud environments.

Infraon IMS is designed to assist in monitoring leased lines, switches, data center services, and devices across different environments. It provides alerts, manages assets, supports ITSM rules, and handles ticketing and incident management. With its comprehensive reporting on uptime, downtime, and memory utilization, Infraon IMS delivers detailed insights facilitating efficient infrastructure management. The platform integrates seamlessly with various systems and simplifies operations through real-time network monitoring, customizable reports, and a role-based access control system.

What are Infraon IMS's key features?
  • Stable Performance: Ensures reliability and efficiency in monitoring and management tasks.
  • Ease of Customization: Allows adjustments to meet specific requirements.
  • Real-Time Dashboards: Enhances usability for non-technical users through intuitive interfaces.
  • Role-Based Access: Facilitates secure, controlled management.
  • Integration Capabilities: Streamlines operations with various platforms.
  • Alerting Mechanisms: Improves incident response with timely notifications.
  • Workflow Automation: Simplifies and accelerates routine processes.
  • Graphical User Interface: Increases user-friendliness and insight accessibility.
What benefits or ROI can users expect?
  • Automated Processes: Reduces manual effort, increasing efficiency.
  • Network Insights: Provides detailed data for proactive management.
  • Comprehensive Reporting: Delivers valuable information for decision-making.
  • Enhanced Security: Manages firewalls and links to ensure robust security.

Infraon IMS is implemented across diverse industries to manage and monitor IT infrastructures, from small to large-scale environments. It is especially beneficial in sectors needing reliable connectivity and efficient incident management, such as telecommunications, finance, and cloud service providers. The platform aids these industries in maintaining operational continuity and optimizing resource allocation.

EverestIMS

VMware vCenter is essential for managing virtual machines, deploying systems for customers, and centralizing ESXi servers' management. It aids in monitoring hosts, handling backups, recovering data, and virtualizing compute resources.

Organizations leverage VMware vCenter to oversee virtual infrastructure, automate administrative tasks, and provide self-service portals. It simplifies the management of IT environments by offering features like host profiles, high availability, and cluster configuration. Other notable features include scalability, resource management, performance monitoring, cloning, snapshots, DRS, LACP, and lifecycle management. VMware vCenter ensures continuous system availability, benefiting sectors like healthcare through efficient server management and process automation. The platform's alerting mechanisms, backup and restore functionalities, and elastic resource allocation enhance operational efficiency.

What are the key features of VMware vCenter?
  • Host Profiles: Simplifies and standardizes host configurations.
  • High Availability: Ensures system uptime and reliability.
  • Centralized Management: Allows comprehensive control over multiple ESXi servers.
  • Scalability: Adapts to growing infrastructure needs.
  • Performance Monitoring: Assesses and optimizes virtual machine performance.
  • Cloning & Snapshots: Facilitates quick deployment and recovery.
  • DRS: Distributes resources efficiently across the cluster.
  • LACP: Enhances network performance and reliability.
  • Lifecycle Management: Manages software updates and hardware lifecycles effectively.
What benefits and ROI can users expect?
  • Operational Efficiency: Automates routine tasks and improves resource management.
  • System Availability: Minimizes downtime and ensures continuous operations.
  • Cost Management: Optimizes resource usage and reduces operational costs.
  • Scalability: Grows with the company's infrastructure needs.
  • Enhanced Performance: Monitors and optimizes virtual machine performance.

Healthcare organizations use VMware vCenter to ensure uninterrupted access to critical applications and patient data. It helps manage large volumes of virtual servers, providing necessary performance and reliability. This platform's automation and monitoring capabilities are crucial for maintaining efficient IT operations and supporting healthcare needs.

VMware
 

Sample Customers

Airtel, BSNL, BlackBox Corporation, ACT, Geojit, Canara Bank, Federal Bank, Corporation Bank, Birla Corporation, CESC Limited, Mphasis, GAIL, Udaan, Cowrks, SEBI, PowerGrid, ION, Summit Communications, National Information Technology Center (Nepal), Bhutan National Bank, Servion T, Greenlam, Translab Technologies, CMSIT Services, Nelco, HPCL, Navitas Life Sciences etc. 
1. Amazon 2. Apple 3. ATT 4. Bank of America 5. Cisco Systems 6. CocaCola 7. Dell 8. ebay 9. Facebook 10. Google 11. HP 12. IBM 13. Intel 14. JPMorgan Chase 15. LinkedIn 16. Microsoft 17. Netflix 18. Oracle 19. PayPal 20. SAP 21. Siemens 22. Tesla 23. Toyota 24. Twitter 25. Visa 26. Walmart 27. WeWork 28. World Bank
Buyer's Guide
Infraon IMS vs. VMware vCenter
April 2025
Free Report: Infraon IMS vs. VMware vCenter
Find out what your peers are saying about Infraon IMS vs. VMware vCenter and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Infraon IMS vs. VMware vCenter report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.