We performed a comparison between Infoblox IPAM and SolarWinds IPAM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IP Address Management (IPAM) Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It helps to avoid manual mistakes and we can add the proper DNS if we add an Alias name to that. We are aware of the CNAME we need to use. By using Infoblox as a DNS, we can add the A and PTR records, which is helpful for the lookup as well as the reverse lookup."
"It provides us with flexibility."
"We can specify the availability of subnets when we create them."
"The most important feature of Infoblox IPAM for my clients is its reliability."
"Infoblox IPAM provides visibility into what's on your network and helps fingerprint devices based on the OS, manufacturer, and other things along those lines."
"One of the most valuable features of this solution has been DNS security. It has a solid foundation for building DNS, DHCP, and Advanced Threat Prevention."
"For me, the best feature of Infoblox IPAM is that you can use BloxOne DDI which means you can manage everything from the cloud and have security policies as well. I also like that Infoblox IPAM is plug-and-play."
"IPAM's best features include the view of how many soft nets are filled from your container and the grid master."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"SolarWinds IPAM is a simple and user-friendly tool."
"Its setup is simple. Its interface is simple. It's very easy to manage."
"The product is user-friendly and valuable."
"The most valuable feature of SolarWinds IPAM is its automated IP address management. Instead of working with Excel sheets, it's automated and saves a lot of time and effort. Additionally, it is adaptable, IT managers enjoy it, and it is high quality."
"I am impressed with the product's reports."
"I like the option to keep all of the available and used IPAM addresses in the central organization."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It takes about half a day, and it can be done by one engineer."
"Infoblox IPAM has improved and is better, but it needs to have an external GSLB functionality. Currently, the solution has a GLSB functionality for internal appliances, but for an external user, that functionality doesn't exist. Infoblox IPAM also needs some improvement on its threat engine and RPZ policies, or DNS firewall or DNS policies. An additional feature I'd like to see in Infoblox IPAM is zero-touch provisioning in terms of the appliances. Currently, there's zero-touch provisioning for cloud-based devices, but for physical appliances in branches, there's none, so you still have to do some configurations. For example, if you have existing DNS infrastructure and you need to set up Infoblox IPAM in new branches, and you need more appliances, you should be able to just plug the solution into the network, and there shouldn't be any manual interference required."
"When we use the forwarders or when we're trying to connect with the internet, sometimes there are issues and the publishing time is longer."
"Infoblox IPAM could improve some of the features. The market is demanding for some features that are not there, but there is always a reason why it's not there. At the moment, the solution is rather complete for what it's used for. It can always extend to solve some other issues that are linked to it, but the solution itself is complete."
"An area for improvement is IPAM's smart folders, which can be slow to access and would benefit from a search feature."
"It is challenging to find training tutorials online."
"How you track IPs within a subnet and how all of that works was not intuitive to me. If I compare it to VitalQIP, I create a subnet, and it's a slash 24 size. It's very easy. I look, and here are my 254 IPs. I can then see if I have assigned a static, do I have a DHCP scope, and what's the name of the device. That's all there in front of me. The thing that I found frustrating with Infoblox was that it was not very intuitive."
"The marketing of the solution could improve to give customers the awareness of the benefits."
"CLI needs to be user-friendly. There should be an option to commit changes."
"My understanding is that IPAM cannot be used for the AWS environment. I might be wrong, but that's what I believe it cannot do. On AWS, SolarWinds IPAM cannot do what it does on the on-prem side. They should explore how to make IPAM capable and scalable on AWS and Azure environments."
"SolarWinds IPAM offers premium support, but the customer has to pay more money, and then they will have minimal response times."
"From any improvement perspective, SolarWinds IPAM should consider working on the area where the tool lacks, which is its network management capabilities."
"They should provide more details on the full stack feature. It needs to be integrated with the hypervisor."
"The installation and storage could be improved."
"Sometimes we have to wait for screens to load, so faster operations would be better."
"The product needs to improve its support. The response time is long and not very helpful."
"I would like more updates."
Infoblox IPAM is ranked 1st in IP Address Management (IPAM) Tools with 15 reviews while SolarWinds IPAM is ranked 3rd in IP Address Management (IPAM) Tools with 10 reviews. Infoblox IPAM is rated 9.0, while SolarWinds IPAM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infoblox IPAM writes "Plug-and-play, stable, scalable, and lets you manage everything from the cloud; has professional technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SolarWinds IPAM writes "A stable and scalable tool meant for IP address management". Infoblox IPAM is most compared with BlueCat Integrity, BT Diamond IP, Micetro, Device42 and NetBox.dev, whereas SolarWinds IPAM is most compared with ManageEngine OpUtils, BlueCat Integrity, Micetro and NetBox.dev. See our Infoblox IPAM vs. SolarWinds IPAM report.
See our list of best IP Address Management (IPAM) Tools vendors.
We monitor all IP Address Management (IPAM) Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
