IBM Spectrum Protect vs Veeam Agent for Linux [EOL] comparison

"It is also a product that has been maturing for a long time. This is good because customers need reliability in their enterprise initiatives."

"It integrates well with Spectrum Scale."

"It is pretty scalable. It will scale to anything."

"One of the features which is most interesting in Spectrum Protect is the ability to scale out to great environments. This is something that not many vendors have on the market."

"Good deduplication and compression features."

"Scalability, performance, mass platform coverage. It's one of the few backup products on the market right now which an organization can bring in and it will serve all of their backup needs. It's a completely centralized solution."

"The most valuable features of Spectrum Protect would be the compression and the deduplication."

"With Spectrum Protect, you can use any type of disk to back-end the repositories. It gave us flexibility to use whatever storage we wanted at our secondary site."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its integration with Veeam Backup & Replication console."

"I like the incremental backups and their failover."

"What I find most valuable about this solution, is that the user experience is very simple."

"The solution is very simple. Management of the platform is so simple that we don't need to have any training to deploy this solution."

"It's simple to use."

"It is scalable."

"The flexibility and user-friendliness of Veeam make it very IT operations-friendly."

"Veeam Agent for Linux's most valuable feature is the compatibility with virtual machines, such as VMware."

"We recently had a situation where we quickly got code, and the number of tapes exceeded the library capacity so we were waiting a while to change. We got a fix for this right away."

"An area for improvement would be the ease of use - the GUI is not up to the mark compared to other products in the market."

"If you take Spectrum Protect into account, and you have it along with restrictions to Spectrum Archive by means of LTFS, this is also something which should be made better within the overall product's program."

"The administration interface should implement more functionalities that exist only in the command line and needs improvement in how some reports are created."

"The stability could be improved."

"The software is complex; setup is complex."

"Probably educating the virtual group who are not as used to the product. Most of our expertise is with AIX servers and virtual server backups."

"I would like to advance reporting and analytics for the platform to see how much data is coming into the platform. how much data is expiring everyday, and what tape savings we are getting through reclamation."

"I would like to be able to install Veeam directly to Linux instead of having to go through a Windows server."

"There isn't much to improve. They just need to follow the trend or the development of other Linux products. Follow in terms of making the product compatible with new versions of Linux. They just need to include as many versions for Linux as possible."

"The pricing could be lowered if possible."

"The price of Veeam Agent for Linux could be reduced."

"It's scalable, but it's not scalable on every platform."

"The integration needs improvement."

"More Linux systems should be made compatible with the solution."

"They could be more customer-friendly."

"We have found that the pricing is high in our country."

"The price of IBM Spectrum Protect is expensive. However, there are a few packages and it is unclear because, for the entry suite they have both options, which are the back-end storage capacity and the front-end storage capacity."

"The solution has a capacity based licensing, front and back-end license."

"Licensing IBM Spectrum Protect can be somewhat confusing for new users due to the options available, such as licensing on a capacity or per server basis."

"The licensing fees are between $8,000 and $10,000 per year."

"We worked our licensing into a capacity model, which is nice. Now, everything is much simpler to manage from a licensing perspective.​"

"That's no longer my department, but I have some past experience with licensing. It is not cheap. I would rate it a three out of five in terms of licensing. In terms of additional costs, there is management overhead. It is a complex solution and a lot of work goes into managing clients. It has gotten better over the years, but compared to its competitor, it is still heavy on management overhead."

"Regarding retro-compatibility of the product between versions, your data is always available and the ROI is unquestionable."

"Price-wise it's good."

"The solution is rather expensive and I think the price is too high."

"Licensing costs are monthly."

"Licensing costs are $300,000 USD yearly, and we pay for three years at a time."

"The costing is very competitive."

"We have purchased a license to use Veeam Agent for Linux and the additional support. The overall cost of Veeam Agent for Linux is expensive."

"Veeam Agent is one of the cheapest products in the market."

"There's the principal license for Veeam Agent for Linux, and then you need to buy additional licenses for your machines."