IBM Security QRadar vs Microsoft ATA [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

IBM and Microsoft are both solutions in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category. Additionally, 91% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

IBM Security QRadar

Read 218 IBM Security QRadar reviews

36,682 Views
4,769 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Microsoft ATA [EOL]

Read 3 Microsoft ATA [EOL] reviews

50% willing to recommend

IBM Security QRadar

Microsoft ATA [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 8, 2026

IBM Security QRadar and Microsoft ATA [EOL] compete in the cybersecurity domain. IBM Security QRadar appears stronger due to its comprehensive feature set and support offerings.

Features: IBM Security QRadar is known for its threat intelligence, scalability, and integration capabilities, enabling an extensive view of security incidents. Microsoft ATA [EOL] is recognized for ease of use, Active Directory integration, and its focus on identifying advanced attacks and insider threats.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Security QRadar provides robust deployment capabilities and dedicated customer support, facilitating smoother implementation in complex environments. Microsoft ATA [EOL] offers straightforward deployment within Microsoft infrastructure but does not offer the same level of comprehensive support as QRadar.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Security QRadar involves higher setup costs, but the extensive capabilities often justify the investment through enhanced security operations and risk reduction. Microsoft ATA [EOL] is cost-effective with lower upfront expenses, offering limited long-term ROI benefits post-EOL.

To learn more, read our detailed User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,523 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Security QRadar

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

218

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (5th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (2nd), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (2nd), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (12th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (4th), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (11th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (10th)

Microsoft ATA [EOL]

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

HarshBhardiya

SOC Engineer at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Have managed daily asset and alert monitoring effectively but have encountered limitations with manual processes and interface usability

It's still very manual and doesn't work on its own. It's still in an early stage and not on par where we can consider it a really successful detection system. The accuracy is not there. The UI could be better when compared to Sentinels where we can use flags and tagging. It could be much more user-friendly. IBM Security QRadar has all features and is fully competitive with other SIEM tools, but when it comes to user-friendliness, a new user takes time to get used to it. More intuitive, user-friendly interfaces and more helpful documentation would be beneficial. The query searching and data fetching could be faster. In large to very large organizations with around 5,000 or 6,000 assets or beyond, even with proper configurations and RAM and hardware backing up, the query is fairly slow.

Read full review

it_user1369068

President and CEO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Good integration, simple to maintain, and very stable

Scalability shouldn't be a problem, at least for the size of network team that I work with. Right now we have between 400 and 500 users. This is deployed in a network that is actually about 500 users. We don't plan to increase usage. We're already using it as fully as we can and we don't have any more room. We might look at all the Microsoft programs that relate to office 365, like the ATP, because there is a difference between the ATA and the ATP. We are going to look and see whether there's any gaps that we can close. I think if you compare ATA with the actual ATP it's basically the same functionality. One is more on-premises versus the cloud. Since we are progressively in moving to the cloud, we might look at the ATP, which integrates better with the Microsoft cloud.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a state-of-the-art product for security information and event management (SIEM)."

"The scalability is awesome, because QRadar includes other solutions in the same console."

"The simple user access model, or the user interface, is something that is very helpful."

"We get events and make the correlation, or rules. In IBM, we can implement our customer's rules. We can have very clear status threats and severity of antigens."

"The most valuable features are all the implementations, the plug-ins, and the User Behavior Analytics (UBA)."

"The most valuable features are its ease of use and that it provides good return on investments."

"The visibility it gives you into your infrastructure has been great, and the notifications it provides offer valuable information when something is happening in your blind spot."

"The threat hunting capabilities in general are great."

More IBM Security QRadar pros

"It has also measurably decreased our mean time to detect threats by about 50 percent, and helped increase staff productivity, saving about an hour per day."

"The solution works well when used with other Microsoft solutions."

"One of the most valuable features is the ability to report on questionable activity."

"The stability of the solution is very good."

"I like the fact that it looks for some of those very, very obscure techniques and attacks like golden tickets; those are very difficult attacks to spot and with Microsoft ATA I was able to have visibility over those kinds of techniques and attacks."

Cons

"The IBM support can be better. It's an aspect that needs improvement."

"Sometimes the system gets hung and then we have to restart everything from scratch."

"It is a bit more expensive than some others, SIEM, but it is more efficient."

"It would probably be better to get more access to the APIs."

"The quoting and the dashboard session could be improved. It should be more user-friendly."

"We sometimes experience downtime, but it depends on the version. There is some variability."

"It sometimes has some technical issues that need to be checked. It requires a dedicated QRadar engineer to completely manage it."

"It would be better if it were more stable and more secure. The price for maintenance could be better. It's too high. In the next release, I think they should focus on the price and the operation."

More IBM Security QRadar cons

"There are occasions where it generates some false positives and you have to embark into figuring it out. You need to find out if it was a true alert or a false positive. It's a little bit cumbersome in that area."

"The software is not as advanced as many competitors."

"Some of the newer features are not completely there yet... For example, there's a tool that allows you to grade your overall internal security and I don't feel that it's completely accurate."

"It would be ideal if the interface allowed for more granular configurations. For example, if I were to set a rule that is a deviation from the pre-defined rules in the Microsoft product, there's conflict."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is based on the EPS model."

"The cost of this product is expensive."

"Go through a vulnerability assessment review for price breaks. A virtualized solution will also cut down on cost."

"I would like for them to lower the price."

"IBM's Qradar is not for small companie. Unfortunately, it would be 'overkill' to place it plainly. The pricing would be too much."

"The price of this solution is a little high."

"QRadar's price is reasonable compared to LogRhythm."

"The pricing is higher but cheaper than others and there are no additional costs."

More IBM Security QRadar pricing and cost advice

"I believe we are looking into new licenses. They may be called the E5. Honestly, I don't have it on top of my mind, but I think it's around seven to $10 a user per month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jun 28, 2015

Qradar vs. ArcSight

Continuing with the SIEM posts we have done at Infosecnirvana, this post is a Head to head comparison of the two Industry leading SIEM products in the market – HP ArcSight and IBM QRadar Both the products have consistently been in the Gartner Leaders Quadrant. Both HP and IBM took over niche SIEM…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	93
Midsize Enterprise	39
Large Enterprise	107

No data available

Questions from the Community

What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?

It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...

See all answers

What SOC product do you recommend?

For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Security QRadar?

I am overall satisfied with the licensing cost for IBM Security QRadar.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs IBM Security QRadar

Compared 13% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs IBM Security QRadar

Compared 3% of the time

Elastic Security vs IBM Security QRadar

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs IBM Security QRadar

Compared 2% of the time

Sentinel vs IBM Security QRadar

Compared 2% of the time

More IBM Security QRadar Competitors

Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs Microsoft ATA [EOL]

Compared 38% of the time

Collibra Platform vs Microsoft ATA [EOL]

Compared 36% of the time

Proofpoint Insider Threat Management vs Microsoft ATA [EOL]

Compared 26% of the time

More Microsoft ATA [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security QRadar

October 2026

Download IBM Security QRadar product report

Buyer's Guide

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

November 2026

Download Microsoft ATA [EOL] product report

Also Known As

IBM QRadar, QRadar SIEM, QRadar UBA, QRadar on Cloud, IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson

Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics, MS ATA [EOL]

Overview

IBM Security QRadar offers real-time threat detection, data correlation, and integration with third-party solutions, providing a user-friendly interface, scalability, and extensive reporting capabilities for SIEM needs.

IBM Security QRadar is designed for comprehensive security monitoring in diverse environments, aiding sectors like telecom and finance with advanced threat detection and breach management. It aggregates data and analyzes user behavior, while its customizable and out-of-the-box rules deliver robust security insights and vulnerability management. The platform seeks enhancements in integration, performance, and user interface, with a focus on AI and cloud service compatibility.

What are the most important features of IBM Security QRadar?

Real-time Threat Detection: Monitors and alerts on security incidents as they happen.
Data Correlation: Aggregates and connects disparate data sources for cohesive analysis.
Third-party Integration: Supports seamless interaction with other security tools.
Scalability: Grows with organizational needs without sacrificing performance.
Customizable Rules: Allows tailored security settings for specific requirements.

What benefits and ROI should be expected?

Enhanced Security Insights: Offers comprehensive coverage across environments.
Reduced False Positives: Minimizes unnecessary alerts, improving efficiency.
User-friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and analysis tasks.
Extensive Reporting Capabilities: Provides detailed insights for informed decision-making.
Compliance Focus: Assists in meeting regulatory standards effectively.

Telecom, finance, and cloud-based industries implement IBM Security QRadar for threat detection, compliance, and security monitoring. It is deployed for log collection and correlation, user behavior analytics, and ensuring secure data transfer and incident management, focusing on compliance and anomaly detection.

IBM

Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics (ATA) provides a simple and fast way to understand what is happening within your network by identifying suspicious user and device activity with built-in intelligence and providing clear and relevant threat information on a simple attack timeline. Microsoft ATA is an on-premises platform to help you protect your enterprise from advanced targeted attacks by automatically analyzing, learning, and identifying normal and abnormal entity (user, devices, and resources) behavior. It detects suspicious activities and malicious attacks with behavioral analytics, adapts to the changing nature of cyber-security threats, focuses on what is important with a simple attack timeline and reduces false positive fatigue.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Clients across multiple industries, such as energy, financial, retail, healthcare, government, communications, and education use QRadar.

Turkish Airlines, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Empa, The Alberta Teachers' Association

Buyer's Guide

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

November 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity, IBM, Exabeam and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.