HiT Software DBMoto vs webMethods.io comparison

"The most valuable features are that is easy to install and it is user-friendly."

"It's a good product that is user-friendly and easy to manage, and I would recommend it to others."

"DBMoto was very simple to set up and move our tables to the Oracle DB."

"DBMoto was very simple to set up and move our tables to the Oracle DB."

"We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting."

"When it comes to the user interface, I'm already really used to it. I cannot say anything against it. For me, it's easy to use."

"By selecting Software AG and using multiple products, this saved us about 72 percent, which has definitely given us more agility."

"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."

"It integrates well with various servers."

"It is a bundled product stack for A2A and B2B usage. It is one of the best products which I have used during my integration career."

"In the API gateway, there is a new feature that allows us to filter logs within a payload. This has been a useful feature."

"I feel comfortable using this product with its ease of building interfaces for developers. This is a better integration tool for integrating with various applications like Oracle, Salesforce, mainframes, etc. It works fine in the integration of legacy software as well."

"Pricing is an area that needs improvement."

"Pricing is an area that needs improvement."

"This product would be improved with additional built-in functions for simpler date conversion, as well as for data type transformations."

"This product would be improved with additional built-in functions for simpler date conversion, as well as for data type transformations."

"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"I'd warn potential users that, if you get into the ESB sort solution, once you get into it, coming out of it is very difficult."

"This solution could be improved by offering subscription based licensing."

"Upgrades are complex. They typically take about five months from start to finish."

"Some things could be improved, especially how ActiveTransfer handles third-party file transfers."

"Support is expensive."

"I think that the product is not completely mature and they need to do some work on that."

"Rapid application development has to be considered, especially for UI, where user interference is crucial."

"Customers pay a license fee yearly."

"I found the price to be quite reasonable."

"I do see a lack of capabilities inside of the monetization area for them. They have a cloud infrastructure that is pay per use type of a thing. If you already use 1,000 transactions per se, then you can be charged and billed. I see room for improvement there for their side on that particular capability of the monetization."

"webMethods Trading Networks is a bit costly compared to others solutions."

"It is an expensive tool. I rate the product price a nine out of ten, where ten means it is very expensive."

"Some of the licensing is "component-ized," which is confusing to new users/customers."

"The pricing and licensing costs for webMethods are very high, which is the only reason that we might switch to another product."

"The price of webMethods Integration Server isn't that high from an enterprise context, but open-source ESB solutions will always be the cheapest."

"With our current licensing, it's very easy for us to scale. With our older licensing model, it was very hard. This is definitely something that I would highlight."

"The product is very expensive."