HiT Software DBMoto vs webMethods.io comparison

"DBMoto was very simple to set up and move our tables to the Oracle DB."

"The most valuable features are that is easy to install and it is user-friendly."

"We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces."

"The orchestration aspects of APIs, the integration capabilities, and the logging functionalities were the most critical features of our workflow."

"It is a very stable product."

"It is a bundled product stack for A2A and B2B usage. It is one of the best products which I have used during my integration career."

"How simple it is to create new solutions."

"The comprehensiveness and depth of Integration Servers' connectors to packaged apps and custom apps is unlimited. They have a connector for everything. If they don't, you can build it yourself. Or oftentimes, if there is value for other customers as well, you can talk with webMethods about creating a new adapter for you."

"The product supports various types of digital documents, including XMLs and EDI."

"We have found the pricing of the solution to be fair."

"This product would be improved with additional built-in functions for simpler date conversion, as well as for data type transformations."

"Pricing is an area that needs improvement."

"The improvement needed is related to the model's position. As of now, it seems to be more of a conceptual idea rather than a widely implemented solution. For how long"

"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."

"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics."

"The stability of the various modules of the product suite have been a bit of a concern lately. Though their support team is always easy to reach out to, I would prefer it not come to that."

"It could be more user-friendly."

"The price should be reduced to make it more affordable."

"This solution could be improved by offering subscription based licensing."

"Customers pay a license fee yearly."

"I found the price to be quite reasonable."

"I do think webMethods is coming under increasing pressure when it comes to their price-to-feature value proposition. It's probably the single biggest strategic risk they have. They're very expensive in their industry. They've been raising the price recently, especially when compared with their competitors."

"It's a good deal for the money that we pay."

"It is an expensive tool. I rate the product price a nine out of ten, where ten means it is very expensive."

"I signed a three-year deal with them. It is a yearly locked-in price for the next three years."

"With our current licensing, it's very easy for us to scale. With our older licensing model, it was very hard. This is definitely something that I would highlight."

"Always plan five years ahead and don’t jeopardize the quality of your project by dropping items from the bill of materials."

"The solution’s pricing is too high."

"This is an expensive product and we may replace it with something more reasonably priced."