Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HighQ vs Polycom Pano comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

HighQ
Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms
21st
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Polycom Pano
Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms
34th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Content Collaboration Platforms category, the mindshare of HighQ is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Polycom Pano is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Content Collaboration Platforms
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: August 2025.
865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Pano
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Addleshaw Goddard, Allen & Overy, Maples, Hill Dickinson, Linklaters
7-Eleven, Abbotsleigh School Addis Ababa Chamber of Commerce & Sectoral Associations, Agricultural Bank of China, ALAIN AFFLELOU, Align Technology, America University of Kuwait, Anders Andersens, Rengoring, Andong Medical Center, AOL
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: August 2025.
865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.