HeadSpin vs Instabug comparison

HeadSpin and Instabug are both solutions in the Mobile APM category. HeadSpin is ranked #7, while Instabug is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.5. HeadSpin holds a 0.3% mindshare in MA, compared to Instabug’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of HeadSpin users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Instabug users who would recommend it.

HeadSpin

Read 6 HeadSpin reviews

65 Views
33 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Instabug

Read 2 Instabug reviews

108 Views
21 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HeadSpin

Instabug

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2024

HeadSpin and Instabug are two notable products in the tech industry with distinct strengths and weaknesses based on user reviews. Instabug seems slightly superior in terms of features, despite higher costs.

Features: HeadSpin is praised for its robust testing capabilities, comprehensive analytics, and its ability to handle various mobile devices effectively. Users of Instabug value its bug and crash reporting, in-app chat, and seamless integration with other tools.

Room for Improvement: HeadSpin needs a more intuitive and updated interface, enhanced report customization, and better documentation. Instabug could improve the depth of analytics, user guidance, and stability of integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HeadSpin receives positive remarks for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Instabug, although user-friendly, sometimes requires more technical support during deployment and has proactive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: HeadSpin has a higher initial setup cost but is often considered worth the investment due to its extensive capabilities. Instabug's pricing is higher than some alternatives, but users are willing to pay a premium for its features and support.

To learn more, read our detailed HeadSpin vs. Instabug Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HeadSpin vs. Instabug

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HeadSpin

Ranking in Mobile APM

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (30th), Mobile App Testing Tools (11th)

Instabug

Ranking in Mobile APM

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Mobile APM category, the mindshare of HeadSpin is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Instabug is 0.6%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile APM

Featured Reviews

Abhishek-Mehta

Associate Vice President at Onnivation

An advanced platform that provides visibility into the performance in the real world and enables us to test AV content

There is definitely room for improvement in terms of marketing. Marketing is something that is not that great. If you look at some of the other companies in the space, they have a lot of published case studies and tested models. They make a lot of noise. They have got some of their best customers talking about them, which is where HeadSpin needs to work. They should automate their onboarding. A lot of things are still manual. They can create a video assistant or something like that to completely automate the entire process. There is a great scope to improve professional services. The time to deploy is quite long. They can increase and improve the scope of their professional services and set up automation through scripts. They do it at this stage, but they're very expensive. I would love to see them come up with project-based costing for companies that are startups or low on funds. Apart from these, they have been on top of the game in terms of features. I can't think of any other new set of features at this point in time because they're already on top in terms of innovation.

Read full review

Aisha Mazher

Senior Semi Automation Engineer at Venturedive

A stable solution that provides visibility into user journeys and enables the filing of RCA reports

The initial setup was really easy. There were some calls that we had to integrate into our code. Instabug was easy to integrate with our app. If we needed special logs for some calls to check the response rate of some end-to-end procedures, we could also integrate them. There were some APIs we could use for end-to-end integration. The product was deployed on Bitbucket. The beta app was deployed in our local environment. The deployment process was not time-consuming. The production phase took a day. It was just a one-time effort. For the beta app, we had to do it multiple times, but it was easy to deploy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup of HeadSpin was very easy and user-friendly. It was easy to configure and write a script."

"The most valuable feature of HeadSpin it's the integration with other solutions. It is great. I can search for an element or do a quick debugging on the application right on HeadSpin. It's very useful."

"The most valuable feature is that this is the first connected intelligence all-in-one platform."

"It has an interesting feature called AV box testing. A lot of companies that are in the OTT segment don't really understand what their streaming is like. They can't test for streaming quality. There are restrictions where you cannot simulate live streaming. For example, on Netflix, you can't simulate how a movie is being streamed on a remote device. That's why HeadSpin has got this AV box testing feature. It is a patented feature. They send an AV box to your location, and you can test live streaming, which is something that no other company does."

"The technical support is really helpful because we can set up direct calls with them if we want to. We can use Zoom or Google Meet to interact with them directly, and if there is an issue in our system, they will help us by reproducing the issue in their machines and trying to figure out a solution. The support is really smooth, and we like that they're very supportive."

"The most valuable features of the product are the performance parameters it gives us."

"The product makes it very easy to reproduce issues."

"I would rate the stability a nine out of ten."

Cons

"HeadSpin needs to improve the hardware. With the mobile, the battery life reduces and must be continuously charged."

"Sometimes, devices go offline and some features are not functioning on some devices, specifically on iOS."

"They should automate their onboarding. A lot of things are still manual. They can create a video assistant or something like that to completely automate the entire process."

"If you want to do some testing or check the devices manually or check the application in a particular device manually, it is really laggy. That's a disappointment because sometimes we would like to do manual testing when our local devices are not available."

"HeadSpin could improve on the user interface because it is very poor. The checks that are done on the iOS devices are very difficult, but for Android, it runs great. For all iOS devices, the user interface and how it interacts with the device are very poor."

"Support and pricing could be improved."

"The end users were not able to report bugs."

"It would be beneficial if the tool could be more precise in capturing steps, focusing only on the relevant ones. For example, there were some times when it caught some extra screenshots which were not included in the steps. Sometimes, it also happened that it got some extra steps that were not in there to reproduce the bug. We also called that screenshot and the steps there as well."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has a yearly license. There is no other option. It is expensive. There are a lot of other cheaper players in the market, but it is like a Mercedes. You pay an extra premium for it, but you get the benefits. I would love to see them come up with project-based costing. Companies that are low on funds or new-age can do with pricing that is easily digestible. They can give them a pricing model for three months. They can provide a startup package."

"We have a yearly license for 16 devices."

"I believe the licensing cost is cheap because it's a total solution, hardware, license and software."

"It's not cheap, but there are a few different packages and different prices for enterprises with different product versions."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile APM solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Real Estate/Law Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Instabug?

The product makes it very easy to reproduce issues.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Instabug?

The end users were not able to report bugs. We had to depend only upon the crash reports. For example, if an application was not crashing, but a specific functionality was not working, the QA perso...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Instabug?

I used the solution to perform RCA for my app. I used to review the crash reports every week and check which API or call was failing repeatedly. I created a debugging configuration in Jira and repo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Perfecto vs HeadSpin

Compared 63% of the time

BrowserStack vs HeadSpin

Compared 37% of the time

More HeadSpin Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HeadSpin

April 2025

Download HeadSpin product report

Buyer's Guide

Mobile APM

March 2025

Download Instabug product report

Overview

Headspin is a data science-driven Mobile APM platform that leverages an AI platform to combine global device infrastructure, test automation, machine learning-driven performance, and quality of experience analytics. HeadSpin was founded to answer the demand for a global testing, performance monitoring, and quality of experience (QoE) management platform to assist businesses in ensuring optimal digital experiences across mobile, audio, online, and video delivery channels.

Headspin facilitates seamless collaboration between product managers, SREs, developers, QA/release engineers, and support staff to:

Quicken development times using intelligent automation in test and production.
Optimize digital performance across devices, networks, and apps.
Automate insights discovery with practical, context-aware AI and analytics.

Headspin Features

Headspin has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Global device infrastructure allows end-to-end monitoring and testing with thousands of devices in numerous locations on real carrier and WiFi networks around the world. SDK is not required.
Test automation and APIs integrate into CI/CD workflows to enable functional and performance testing pre and post release. Support for all testing frameworks.
Performance, QoE, and machine learning automatically expose issues and points to underlying root causes across all layers of the stack, from quantifying audio/video quality of experience to code and packet visibility.
Insights-to-actions delivers regression and aggregation insights throughout the digital experience lifecycle. These insights take you from planning and development to troubleticketing and operations. Trending, alerts, and analytics.

More features include:

Hosted Device Cloud
On-prem Device Appliance
Performance & Experience Analytics
Professional Services & Support
Education, Certification & Training

Headspin Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Headspin. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Use data science to identify problems and root cause analysis

Empower QA and DevOps teams with data science insights and test automation

Global teams can work together using remote access

Capture performance and UX issues

Reviews from Real Users

Headspin stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Some of these include its easy setup, scalability, and robust customer support. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

Abhishek M., Associate Vice President at Onnivation, notes, “A lot of companies that are using other solutions do not get access to the kind of metrics that HeadSpin captures…HeadSpin is highly advanced. It has got all the performance structures to provide visibility into how my app is performing in the real world. It also helps to identify the gaps.”

Shiba S., Automation Engineer at GlobalLogic India, writes, “The technical support is really helpful because we can set up direct calls with them if we want to…They support multiple devices. Plus, they support distribution testing.”

HeadSpin

Instabug is a tool used for bug tracking and reporting in mobile apps, enabling teams to capture issues directly from users with detailed error logs, screenshots, and steps to reproduce for efficient bug fixing.

Instabug is essential for bug tracking and reporting within mobile applications. Teams can capture issues directly from users, helping developers identify and address bugs swiftly. In addition, Instabug facilitates beta testing and gathering user feedback, streamlining the development process and enabling quick resolution of issues. The tool offers detailed error logs, screenshots, and steps to reproduce issues, making it easier for developers to pinpoint and fix problems.

What are Instabug's key features?

Easy integration: Quickly add Instabug to any mobile app with minimal setup.
Comprehensive bug tracking: Capture detailed error logs, screenshots, and steps to reproduce issues.
Efficient crash reporting: Gain insights into app crashes with complete reports.
In-app feedback: Collect user feedback directly within the app.
Session replay: Replay user sessions to understand the context of issues.
Robust analytics: Analyze data to improve app performance and user experience.
Customizable workflows: Tailor workflows to fit team processes.

What benefits should users look for in the reviews?

Improved issue resolution: Faster identification and fixing of bugs.
Enhanced communication: Streamlined communication between developers and testers.
Increased efficiency: Reduction in time spent on debugging and issue reporting.
Better user experience: Swift addressing of user-reported issues enhances overall satisfaction.

Instabug is implemented in various industries for tasks like mobile app development, beta testing, and user feedback collection. Development teams rely on it for capturing comprehensive bug reports and detailed error logs, facilitating smoother workflows. Companies in tech, finance, retail, and healthcare sectors integrate Instabug to enhance app performance and user satisfaction through efficient bug tracking and feedback systems.

Instabug

Sample Customers

Zynga, Tinder, Pinterest, Akamai, Microsoft, Airbnb, Jam City, TMobile, Mozilla, CNN, Cognizant, Yahoo!, ebay, Quora, Walmart, Kohls, Telstra

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

HeadSpin vs. Instabug

April 2025

Free Report: HeadSpin vs. Instabug

Find out what your peers are saying about HeadSpin vs. Instabug and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HeadSpin vs. Instabug report.

See our list of best Mobile APM vendors.

We monitor all Mobile APM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.