HackerOne and Tenable Attack Surface Management are competing in the cybersecurity domain. Tenable has an advantage due to its comprehensive feature set, while HackerOne is favored for its pricing and customer support.
Features: HackerOne facilitates ethical hacking initiatives and vulnerability coordination, offering security teams efficient engagement with external experts. It features robust reporting tools, streamlined security workflow, and an intuitive platform. Tenable offers asset discovery and risk assessment tools, enabling organizations to understand their attack surface. It provides detailed risk analysis, continuous monitoring capabilities, and integration with other security systems.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HackerOne offers a straightforward deployment process and active customer support. Tenable's integration is more complex but includes comprehensive support for technical challenges. While Tenable's setup can be initially challenging, its customer service effectively addresses these issues.
Pricing and ROI: HackerOne is known for competitive pricing and offers strong ROI for organizations with budget restrictions. It remains attractive for cost efficiency. Tenable incurs higher setup costs, but the extensive features justify the investment for those seeking thorough security insights, providing deeper value through expansive capabilities.
Get comprehensive visibility into all of your internet-connected assets, services and applications to better understand your organization’s full digital footprint and better assess and manage risk.
Tenable Attack Surface Management (formerly Tenable.asm) continuously maps the entire internet and discovers connections to your internet-facing assets so you can discover and assess the security posture of your entire external attack surface.
We monitor all Attack Surface Management (ASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
