IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why
  • Home
  • Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics

Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection vs Splunk User Behavior Analytics comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
July 2022
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, Forter and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: July 2022.
DOWNLOAD NOW
622,645 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
622,645 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Splunk User Behavior Analytics?
Top Answer:This is a good security product.
Read all 12 answers   →
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk User Behav...
Top Answer:The solution isn't overly expensive. It's quite affordable. It's not the priciest option on the market. I'm not sure of the exact cost as its not an aspect of the solution I directly deal with.
Read all 9 answers   →
What needs improvement with Splunk User Behavior Analytics?
Top Answer:The price of Splunk UBA is too high.
Read all 12 answers   →
Ranking
21st
out of 50 in Fraud Detection and Prevention
Views
355
Comparisons
303
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
11th
out of 41 in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
Views
7,775
Comparisons
5,631
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
389
Rating
8.7
Comparisons
Also Known As
FraudMAP
Caspida, Splunk UBA
Learn More
Guardian Analytics
Video Not Available
Splunk
Overview

Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is the first fraud prevention solution to use behavior-based anomaly detection. To complement our expertise in behavioral analytics, we actively study fraudsters’ techniques to make sure we’re always one step ahead. We are also the only solution that automatically and immediately protects 100 percent of users and account holders against all types of threats and schemes, and dynamically adapts to new attacks and changes in legitimate user behavior. In addition to fraudulent payments, we detect account takeover, reconnaissance, and fraud set-up activity that indicate possible criminal activity in the early stages of an attack so our customers can proactively intervene before there’s any money movement. And we do it all without rules and without disrupting users’ normal activity or process.

Splunk User Behavior Analytics is a behavior-based threat detection is based on machine learning methodologies that require no signatures or human analysis, enabling multi-entity behavior profiling and peer group analytics – for users, devices, service accounts and applications. It detects insider threats and external attacks using out-of-the-box purpose-built that helps organizations find known, unknown and hidden threats, but extensible unsupervised machine learning (ML) algorithms, provides context around the threat via ML driven anomaly correlation and visual mapping of stitched anomalies over various phases of the attack lifecycle (Kill-Chain View). It uses a data science driven approach that produces actionable results with risk ratings and supporting evidence that increases SOC efficiency and supports bi-directional integration with Splunk Enterprise for data ingestion and correlation and with Splunk Enterprise Security for incident scoping, workflow management and automated response. The result is automated, accurate threat and anomaly detection.
Offer
Learn more about Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection
Learn More
Learn more about Splunk User Behavior Analytics
Learn More
Sample Customers
Illinois Community Bank, NEFCU
8 Securities, AAA Western, AdvancedMD, Amaya, Cerner Corporation, CJ O Shopping, CloudShare, Crossroads Foundation, 7-Eleven Indonesia
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm27%
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider13%
Government7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm50%
Insurance Company13%
Government13%
Security Firm13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company21%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm10%
Government9%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise65%
REVIEWERS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise38%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise69%
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
July 2022
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, Forter and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: July 2022.
DOWNLOAD NOW
622,645 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is ranked 21st in Fraud Detection and Prevention while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is ranked 11th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 3 reviews. Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is rated 0.0, while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk User Behavior Analytics writes "Stable, with good automation capabilities, however, we want to be able to automate even more". Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is most compared with ThreatMetrix, F5 Shape Security, Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management, Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub and IBM Trusteer, whereas Splunk User Behavior Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Elastic Enterprise Search, Cisco Stealthwatch, Microsoft Defender for Identity and IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics.

We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.