Graylog vs Quest InTrust comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Graylog Logo
10,226 views|8,623 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Quest Software Logo
351 views|282 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Graylog and Quest InTrust based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Log Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Andrey Mostovykh
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution's most valuable feature is its new interface.""One of the most valuable features is that you are able to do a very detailed search through the log messages in the overview.""The build is stable and requires little maintenance, even compared to some extremely expensive products.""We're using the Community edition, but I know that it has really good dashboarding and alerts.""It is used as a log manager/SIEM. It provides visibility into the infrastructure and security related events.""I am very proud of how very stable the solution is.""Graylog's search functionality, alerting functionality, user management, and dashboards are useful.""We have scaled from a single machine installation (a VM with a Graylog + ES + MongoDB) to (2 Graylog + 2 ES + 3 MongoDB). This was done smoothly with a minimal impact on logging."

More Graylog Pros →

"​I would rate the technical support very well as they are knowledgeable and quick to respond​."

More Quest InTrust Pros →

Cons
"Lacks sufficient documentation.""Its scalability gets complicated when we have to update or edit multiple nodes.""Graylog could improve the process of creating rules. We have to create them manually by doing parses and applying them. Other SIEM solutions have basic rules and you can create and get more events of interest.""The biggest problem is the collector application, as we wanted to avoid using Graylog Collector Sidecar due to its architecture.""Over six months, I had two similar issues where searches were performed on field "messages". It exhausted all the memory of the ES node causing an ES crash and a Graylog halt.""Dashboards, stream alerts and parsing could be improved.""More complex visualizations and the ability to execute custom Elasticsearch queries would be great.""Since container orchestration systems are popular and Graylog fits the niche well, perhaps they could officially support running in docker containers on Kubernetes as a StatefulSet as a use case. That way, the declarative nature of Kubernetes config files would document their best case deployment scenario-"

More Graylog Cons →

"​It needs to have better reporting. ​""​It was very complex. There was poor native correlation. ​"

More Quest InTrust Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Having paid official support is wise for projects."
  • "I am using a community edition. I have not looked at the enterprise offering from Graylog."
  • "If you want something that works and do not have the money for Splunk or QRadar, take Graylog.​​"
  • "​You get a lot out-of-the-box with the non-enterprise version, so give it a try first."
  • "Consider Enterprise support if you have atypical needs or setup requirements.​"
  • "I use the free version of Graylog."
  • "It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."
  • "We're using the Community edition."
  • More Graylog Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Do a PoC. Make it detailed so it can help later."
  • More Quest InTrust Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product is scalable. The solution is stable.
    Top Answer:We are using the free version of the product. However, the paid version is expensive.
    Top Answer:Since it's a free tool, I don't have much to say. Troubleshooting is important to me. The initial setup is complex. I hope to see improvements in Graylog for more interactivity, user-friendliness, and… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    11th
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    10,226
    Comparisons
    8,623
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    802
    Rating
    7.3
    57th
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    351
    Comparisons
    282
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Graylog2
    Learn More
    Overview

    Graylog is purpose-built to deliver the best log collection, storage, enrichment, and analysis. Graylog is:

    • Considerably faster analysis speeds.
    • More robust and easier-to-use analysis platform.
    • Simpler administration and infrastructure management.
    • Lower cost than alternatives.
    • Full-scale customer service.
    • No expensive training or tool experts required.

    InTrust is an event log management solution that addresses all of these concerns in heterogeneous environments composed of Windows, Unix and Linux servers, databases, business applications and network devices.

    InTrust enables you to securely collect, store, search and analyze massive amounts of IT data from numerous data sources, systems and devices in one place. Get real-time insights into user activity for security, compliance and operational visibility.

    Sample Customers
    Blue Cross Blue Shield, eBay, Cisco, LinkedIn, SAP, King.com, Twilio, Deutsche Presse-Agentur
    Platinum Bank
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Government8%
    Educational Organization7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government18%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Insurance Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise76%
    Buyer's Guide
    Log Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management. Updated: April 2024.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Graylog is ranked 11th in Log Management with 18 reviews while Quest InTrust is ranked 57th in Log Management. Graylog is rated 8.0, while Quest InTrust is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Graylog writes "Great detailed search features and easy Java integration, but needs improvement in integration with Python". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest InTrust writes "Technical support is knowledgeable and quick to respond". Graylog is most compared with Grafana Loki, Wazuh, syslog-ng, Splunk Enterprise Security and Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, whereas Quest InTrust is most compared with Change Auditor for Windows File Servers and syslog-ng.

    See our list of best Log Management vendors.

    We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.