Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025
Splunk Observability Cloud and Google Kubernetes Engine compete in the observability and container management category. Splunk has the upper hand in data visualization and monitoring features, while GKE offers superior integration and scalability with cloud services.
Features: Splunk Observability Cloud offers advanced log searching, data integration, and customizable dashboards. It provides effective security insights and monitoring, allowing users to aggregate and visualize diverse data effectively. Google Kubernetes Engine is known for robust autoscaling, easy deployment, and integration with other Google services. It supports multi-cloud setups, enabling detailed insights into containerized deployments and enhancing scalability.
Room for Improvement: Splunk requires better integration with other platforms and a more cost-effective pricing model. There is also a need for improved user interface and automation features. Google Kubernetes Engine users suggest enhancements in configuration management and better documentation. More application integrations and reduced complexity in configurations are also desired.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk Observability Cloud is versatile, supporting on-premises, private, and public cloud deployments. Users commend its responsive customer service. Google Kubernetes Engine is primarily deployed in public and hybrid cloud environments, offering straightforward deployment and strong technical support, though some users find its customer service less responsive compared to Splunk.
Pricing and ROI: Splunk Observability Cloud is considered expensive, but it is valued for fast ROI and operational efficiency improvements. Google Kubernetes Engine offers competitive pricing for its features, though costs can rise with advanced configurations. Both tools are seen as valuable investments, enhancing efficiency and productivity.
