We performed a comparison between Google Kubernetes Engine and Mirantis Container Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."GKE's plugin management and configuration sync are excellent features. The amount of data it provides is good, and I've been able to integrate it with the things I need."
"The logs are important for detecting problems in our clusters."
"We hardly have a breakdown. It's been very stable."
"Google Kubernetes Engine's most valuable features are microservices and its acquisition rate, which is very useful for scaling perspective."
"The initial setup is very easy. We can create our cluster using the command line, or using our console."
"The product has valuable security features. It can connect with multiple DevOps tools."
"The deployment of the cluster is very easy."
"The features are typical Kubernetes, but Google One offers a better GUI-based deployment. It's more sophisticated and integrates well with other services, providing a better customer experience."
"This solution has improved our organization with the agility, microservices approach, and scalable solutions for distributed systems."
"I think the volume binding is a really interesting feature."
"The product is easy to use."
"The UI is very useful."
"One of the most valuable feature is its scalability because it is easy to work with. Even though I haven't fully removed it before, it's simple to get started and develop further. It's comparable to working with languages like C++ and Python. Python. It is easy to understand and more user-friendly."
"The most valuable aspect is the excellent support. In addition, the billing system is really easy to understand."
"When you have Kubernetes, you can use Mirantis Container Cloud to manage your Kubernetes for easy access and security. It also helps you to manage your CI/CD system. It helps you to build a container-oriented developer workflow. So, if you're building an application in Kubernetes, it provides you with a Kubernetes engine."
"If we compare legacy application support to Docker, it's a superior product."
"There is room for improvement in this solution. For example, auto-scaling can be complex. We expect it to be easier to set up and manage, even for our customers."
"The console for this solution could be improved because it is very limited."
"The tool's configuration features need improvement."
"The product could be cheaper."
"The notifications are not informative."
"Their documentation is a little here and there. Sometimes, the information is not clear or updated. Their documentation should be a little bit better."
"It needs to support load balancing."
"I use the Firebase tool with GKE and it would be helpful if the solution can give notifications when we reach the budget limit."
"An improvement would be automated testing."
"The solution would benefit in improvements made to the storage, cleaning up information from the disk, and reading logs."
"The initial setup was quite complex."
"The orchestration and tracing should be improved."
"There could be an automation feature included in the product. It will speed up application processes and will not require scripting codes."
"In my previous years, I have brainstormed about the development of Container software. I have recently shifted focus, but the knowledge gained from those were really helpful. In my experience, Containers have their own complexities and to implement them, open source information is crucial. A software with new features would be beneficial. I suggest to implement a flow-based approach for container sequences, similar to Google Cloud's machine learning. The current process of deploying containers involves too many steps, and a more streamlined method would be appreciated. I've even automated deployment using APIs. Overall, simplifying container management and deployment processes would be valuable."
"When it comes to the integration part, it's the basic functionality, but for any product, at the end of the day, security is extremely relevant. I personally feel like you have to constantly strive towards being more secure. You can never be 100% secure, and you have to work more toward security. It's as simple as that."
"It will be better if the product provides dynamic load-balancing capabilities."
Google Kubernetes Engine is ranked 10th in Container Management with 31 reviews while Mirantis Container Cloud is ranked 1st in Container Virtualization with 26 reviews. Google Kubernetes Engine is rated 8.0, while Mirantis Container Cloud is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Google Kubernetes Engine writes "The auto-scaling feature helps during peak hours, but the support is not great". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mirantis Container Cloud writes "An easy-to-manage solution that helps to manage web pages ". Google Kubernetes Engine is most compared with Kubernetes, Linode, OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control and Rancher Labs, whereas Mirantis Container Cloud is most compared with SUSE Rancher, Canonical LXD and Snyk. See our Google Kubernetes Engine vs. Mirantis Container Cloud report.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.