We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy and Safe-T Secure Application Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tailscale, Twingate, Perimeter 81 and others in ZTNA."The latest versions of the managed Kubernetes clusters are good."
"We do not need to maintain the hardware."
"It is totally awesome in terms of scalability. Its scalability was the main reason for moving to Google Cloud. It also comes with a lot of features. We are satisfied with the features it has."
"The solution's speed, processing power, and user functionality are some of its most valuable features."
"If you have a good understanding of infrastructure, this solution is perfect."
"It is a scalable solution."
"I like Google Cloud IAP because it is easy to use and stable."
"Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy provides more control of our assets because normally when you're using Google Cloud, you have to use your Google email. IAP can control the assets that only come from the dedicated company or IP address."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pros →
"Safe-T is very good for users because it has plug-in for Outlook."
"the security level is very high. After we tested it and checked all the security aspects of the product, we found that it's highly secure."
"If you want a very flexible system that you can easily integrate, and develop interfaces for it or plug-ins to other application environments, it's probably the most flexible"
"It's easy to use over the web. A user who is not in the office can use it and securely insert files."
"The solution is a bit complex and could be made easier to use."
"The platform’s stability and scalability need improvement."
"As an individual developer, I would like Google Cloud IAP to offer more flexibility, especially for smaller-scale usage."
"I think this product needs to shift the focus from our software, our solution, like social media analytics to our customers; not maintenance in the hardware."
"Sometimes we face uncertainty when our internet connection gets disconnected. It becomes challenging to determine whether it's an issue with our internet or if the GCP has crashed."
"The solution's AI integration could be improved."
"Stability-wise, the service could be improved."
"The stability regarding voice commands in the solution has certain shortcomings that need improvement."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Cons →
"One important thing that we haven't found in this product is the ability to provide a read-only view for documents. Also, the ability for the customer to add annotations to these documents."
"The Outlook agent is not working well for installing it in the entire office."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is ranked 7th in ZTNA with 43 reviews while Safe-T Secure Application Access is ranked 20th in ZTNA. Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is rated 8.4, while Safe-T Secure Application Access is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy writes "User-friendly, easy to navigate, and intuitive interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Safe-T Secure Application Access writes "The architecture is open to integration and development, making the product very flexible". Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is most compared with Cloudflare Access, Okta Workforce Identity, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cato SASE Cloud Platform and Cisco Duo, whereas Safe-T Secure Application Access is most compared with .
See our list of best ZTNA vendors.
We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.