Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GNU Make vs LaunchDarkly comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

GNU Make
Ranking in Build Automation
26th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
LaunchDarkly
Ranking in Build Automation
17th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

it_user790464 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 18, 2017
Full-featured syntax allows building strategies as simple or as complex as needed
GNU Make is such an essential tool that it is almost impossible to imagine working without it. Not having it, developers would probably have to resort to doing everything manually or via shell scripts. Tools such as automake and various IDEs that depend on GNU Make would be rendered useless Lack…
James Bayhylle - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 10, 2024
Provides risk-free releases with control access and A/B testing
It allowed us to deploy faster. Despite having a rigorous code review process that slowed things down, once the code was reviewed, LaunchDarkly enabled safe deployments. If there was ever an issue, we could easily roll back a particular release by simply turning off the feature flag. When configuring and setting this up, begin with feature sets that are relatively small in scope. This helps build the necessary skills to leverage the product effectively while maintaining control over the blast radius, thus reducing risk to your customers and application in case of misconfiguration. As you gain more experience with the solution, it's crucial to have a process to manage feature flag sprawl, as mentioned earlier. Implementing a life cycle management system for your feature flags is essential. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten because of its intuitiveness and ease of use.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"GNU Make is such an essential tool that it is almost impossible to imagine working without it. Not having it, developers would probably have to resort to doing everything manually or via shell scripts."
"Setup is extremely straightforward."
"I have not encountered any scalability issues with GNU Make. It is as scalable as the project's structure is, and then some."
"Full-featured syntax allows building strategies as simple or as complex as one wishes, and declarative approach fits the task really well. Wide adoption also means that everybody knows what GNU Make is and how to use it."
"Makefiles are extremely easy to work with using any preferred editor. GNU Make can be run directly from the terminal, not requiring any time wasted on clicking."
"It has really helped during the series of product lines and faster deployment and faster development."
"From the development side, it allows us to manage multiple things."
"The initial setup is very easy."
 

Cons

"Vanilla GNU Make does not support any kind of colored output. A wrapper named colormake exists to work around this, but native (opt-in) support would be welcome."
"GNU Make requires using the Tab symbol as the first symbol of command line for execution. In some text editors this can be problematic, as they automatically insert spaces instead of tabs."
"I strongly believe they need to develop a strategy for handling situations where LaunchDarkly goes down."
"When the system has an excessive number of feature flags, managing them can become cumbersome."
"The feature where one feature flag is dependent on another could be explored more for our usage."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is no price for this product. No licensing. It’s open-source."
"GNU Make is free and open source software."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LaunchDarkly?
I am not sure about the pricing or setup costs. It is all handled by our organization.
What needs improvement with LaunchDarkly?
As of now, I do not see much room for improvement. The feature where one feature flag is dependent on another could be explored more for our usage.
What is your primary use case for LaunchDarkly?
Our developers are using LaunchDarkly. I am using it to turn on features.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about GNU Make vs. LaunchDarkly and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.