We performed a comparison between Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series and PowerEdge C based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers."The most valuable feature of the solution is its stability."
"Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series has two processors."
"I like the feature that allows for a backup and that is suitable for me."
"The scalability of the product is good since it offers high performance and capacity."
"It's a good product. Virtualization on it is good."
"PowerEdge C is the best server I have worked with. I like that it's user-friendly. PowerEdge C performs very well."
"The management platform is great."
"The performance is good."
"The solution provides good support and service."
"PowerEdge servers have high CPU processing power, and the support is also good."
"The initial setup of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series was complex."
"It can have more automation. In addition, Fujitsu should have a broader portfolio, not specifically in terms of the service solutions, but more in terms of the big picture. A broader portfolio would be nice for providing different solutions for the customers."
"It would be better if it worked with SMTP servers on the cloud. Right now, it only allows notifications via the SMTP server. In the next release, I would like to have a better processor."
"The current memory could be improved."
"There could be some more ports added in the future."
"It should be improved in terms of future expansion. We should be able to have additional free slots for future extensions in terms of memory."
"Its customer service could be better."
"The solution’s pricing could be cheaper."
"A feature that needs to be added is the ability for full container storage."
"There is some trouble with the stability part of the product, making it an area where improvements are required."
More Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is ranked 13th in Blade Servers with 3 reviews while PowerEdge C is ranked 5th in Blade Servers with 23 reviews. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is rated 8.0, while PowerEdge C is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series writes "A highly stable solution with technical support that is not only good but also always available to help the product's users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PowerEdge C writes "Easy to deploy and has high performance and no downtime". Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is most compared with Super Micro SuperBlade and Fujitsu CX1000, whereas PowerEdge C is most compared with Huawei FusionServer X Series and HPE Apollo.
See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.